Change unused_labels from allow to warn
Fixes#66324, making the unused_labels lint warn instead of allow by default. I'm told @rust-lang/lang will need to review this, and perhaps will want to do a crater run.
Miri core engine: use throw_ub instead of throw_panic
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66902 for context: panicking is not really an "interpreter error", but just part of a normal Rust execution. This is a first step towards removing the `InterpError::Panic` variant: the core Miri engine does not use it any more.
ConstProp and ConstEval still use it, though. This will be addressed in future PRs.
From what I can tell, all the error messages this removes are actually duplicates.
r? @oli-obk @wesleywiser
Emit coercion suggestions in more places
Fixes#66910
We have several different kinds of suggestions we can try to make when
type coercion fails. However, we were previously only emitting these
suggestions from `demand_coerce_diag`. This resulted in the compiler
failing to emit applicable suggestions in several different cases, such
as when the implicit return value of a function had the wrong type.
This commit adds a new `emit_coerce_suggestions` method, which tries to
emit a number of related suggestions. This method is called from both
`demand_coerce_diag` and `CoerceMany::coerce_inner`, which covers a much
wider range of cases than before.
We now suggest using `.await` in more cases where it is applicable,
among other improvements.
I'm not happy about disabling the `issue-59756`, but from what I can tell, the suggestion infrastructure in rustc lacks any way of indicating mutually exclusive suggestions (and compiletest lacks a way to only apply a subset of available suggestions).
Remove potential cfgs duplicates
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66921.
Before going any further (the issue seems to be linked to metadata as far as I can tell). Do you think this is the good place to do it or should it be done before?
r? @eddyb
Add long error for E0631 and update ui tests.
This PR adds a long error for `E0631`, which covers errors where closure argument types are mismatched. It also updates UI tests where this error is applicable.
Part of #61137
Make const-qualification look at more `const fn`s
As explained in a lot more detail in #67053 this makes const-qualification not ignore the unstable const fns in libcore.
r? @oli-obk cc @ecstatic-morse
(Still a bit unsure about the `cfg`s here, for bootstrapping, does that seem correct ?)
Fixes#67053.
Include a span in more `expected...found` notes
In most places, we use a span when emitting `expected...found` errors.
However, there were a couple of places where we didn't use any span,
resulting in hard-to-interpret error messages.
This commit attaches the relevant span to these notes, and additionally
switches over to using `note_expected_found` instead of manually
formatting the message
Make `process_obligations()` greedier.
`process_obligations()` adds new nodes, but it does not process these
new nodes until the next time it is called.
This commit changes it so that it does process these new nodes within
the same call. This change reduces the number of calls to
`process_obligations()` required to complete processing, sometimes
giving significant speed-ups.
The change required some changes to tests.
- The output of `cycle-cache-err-60010.rs` is slightly different.
- The unit tests required extra cases to handle the earlier processing
of the added nodes. I mostly did these in the simplest possible way,
by making the added nodes be ignored, thus giving outcomes the same as
with the old behaviour. But I changed `success_in_grandchildren()`
more extensively so that some obligations are completed earlier than
they used to be.
r? @nikomatsakis
In most places, we use a span when emitting `expected...found` errors.
However, there were a couple of places where we didn't use any span,
resulting in hard-to-interpret error messages.
This commit attaches the relevant span to these notes, and additionally
switches over to using `note_expected_found` instead of manually
formatting the message
Currently, rustfix has no notion of mutually exclusive suggestions. When
it processes issue-59756, it will attempt to apply two mutually
exclusive suggestions for the same span, causing an error.
Fixes#66910
We have several different kinds of suggestions we can try to make when
type coercion fails. However, we were previously only emitting these
suggestions from `demand_coerce_diag`. This resulted in the compiler
failing to emit applicable suggestions in several different cases, such
as when the implicit return value of a function had the wrong type.
This commit adds a new `emit_coerce_suggestions` method, which tries to
emit a number of related suggestions. This method is called from both
`demand_coerce_diag` and `CoerceMany::coerce_inner`, which covers a much
wider range of cases than before.
We now suggest using `.await` in more cases where it is applicable,
among other improvements.
