Change `{Box,Arc,Rc,Weak}::into_raw` to only work with `A = Global`
Also applies to `Vec::into_raw_parts`.
The expectation is that you can round-trip these methods with `from_raw`, but this is only true when using the global allocator. With custom allocators you should instead be using `into_raw_with_allocator` and `from_raw_in`.
The implementation of `Box::leak` is changed to use `Box::into_raw_with_allocator` and explicitly leak the allocator (which was already the existing behavior). This is because, for `leak` to be safe, the allocator must not free its underlying backing store. The `Allocator` trait only guarantees that allocated memory remains valid until the allocator is dropped.
Remove some unsized tuple impls now that we don't support unsizing tuples anymore
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137728 there is no sound way to create unsized tuples anymore. While we can't remove them from the language (tried here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138093) due to people using `PhantomData<(T, U)>` where `U: ?Sized` (they'd have to use `(PhantomData<T>, PhantomData<U>)` now), we can remove the impls from libcore I believe.
r? libs I guess?
Derive `Copy` and `Hash` for `IntErrorKind`
This PR derives `Copy` and `Hash` for `IntErrorKind` to make it easier to work with. (see #131826)
I think an argument could be made to also derive `PartialOrd` + `Ord` as well given that other error kinds in the std like [`io::ErrorKind`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/std/io/error.rs.html#212-428) do this. Granted these seem much less useful for errors.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131826
Don't recompute `DisambiguatorState` for every RPITIT in trait definition
The `associated_type_for_impl_trait_in_trait` currently needs to rerun the `RPITVisitor` for every RPITIT to compute its disambiguator.
Instead of synthesizing all of the RPITITs def ids one at a time in different queries, just synthesize them inside of the `associated_types_for_impl_traits_in_associated_fn` query. There we can just share the same `DisambiguatorState` for all the RPITITs in one function signature.
r? ``````@Zoxc`````` or ``````@oli-obk`````` cc rust-lang/rust#140453
[COMPILETEST-UNTANGLE 3/N] Use "directives" consistently within compiletest
Instead of using *both* "headers" and "directives" within compiletest to refer to the same thing. This of course induces some churn, but it's been bugging me for a while, and I rather do the self-consistency changes now than later.
The first commit tries to be mostly move-only to help per-file git history.
I intend to revisit rustc-dev-guide's testing docs, but I don't want to do it on rust-lang/rust side because it would need syncing and might conflict.
fix bitcast of single-element SIMD vectors
in effect this reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142768 and adds additional tests. That PR relaxed the conditions on an early return in an incorrect way that would create broken LLVM IR.
https://godbolt.org/z/PaaGWTv5a
```rust
#![feature(repr_simd)]
#[repr(simd)]
#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
struct S([i64; 1]);
#[no_mangle]
pub extern "C" fn single_element_simd(b: S) -> i64 {
unsafe { std::mem::transmute(b) }
}
```
at the time of writing generates this LLVM IR, where the type of the return is different from the function's return type.
```llvm
define noundef i64 ``````@single_element_simd(<1`````` x i64> %b) unnamed_addr {
start:
ret <1 x i64> %b
}
```
The test output is actually the same for the existing tests, showing that the change didn't actually matter for any tested behavior. It is probably a bit faster to do the early return, but, well, it's incorrect in general.
zullip thread: [#t-compiler > Is transmuting a `T` to `Tx1` (one-element SIMD vector) UB?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Is.20transmuting.20a.20.60T.60.20to.20.60Tx1.60.20.28one-element.20SIMD.20vector.29.20UB.3F/with/526262799)
cc ``````@sayantn``````
r? ``````@scottmcm``````
Remove let_chains unstable feature
Per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53667#issuecomment-3016742982 (but then I also noticed rust-lang/rust#140722)
This replaces the feature gate with a parser error that says let chains require 2024.
A lot of tests were using the unstable feature. I either added edition:2024 to the test or split out the parts that require 2024.
This is a newly added triagebot capability, which allows registering and
then resolving concerns with an issue or a pull request. The concerns
are gathered by Triagebot in the issue/PR summary.
Concerns are different from notes: when a concern is resolved, it is
striked through in the issue/PR summary, and a link to the comment
resolving it is also added, whereas a note can only be removed and then
disappears from the summary.
The `has-concerns` label, which must be created at the time of merging
this change, will be automatically set on issues/PRs that have
unresolved concerns, and cleared when all concerns are resolved.
changelog: none
This is a newly added triagebot capability, which allows registering and
then resolving concerns with an issue or a pull request. The concerns
are gathered by Triagebot in the issue/PR summary.
Concerns are different from notes: when a concern is resolved, it is
striked through in the issue/PR summary, and a link to the comment
resolving it is also added, whereas a note can only be removed and then
disappears from the summary.
The `has-concerns` label, which must be created at the time of merging
this change, will be automatically set on issues/PRs that have
unresolved concerns, and cleared when all concerns are resolved.
changelog: none
This tries to make progress on
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78717 by using the ui_test
dependency handling instead of linking in the dependencies of clippy
itself with the tests. This partially reverts
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11045. However, we still
use the old style of dealing with dependencies for clippy's own crates
and the "internal" tests, as otherwise those would get rebuilt which
takes too long.
Add new self-profiling event to cheaply aggregate query cache hit counts
Self-profile can record various types of things, some of them are not enabled, like query cache hits. Rustc currently records cache hits as "instant" measureme events, which records the thread ID, current timestamp, and constructs an individual event for each such cache hit. This is incredibly expensive, in a small hello world benchmark that just depends on serde, it makes compilation with nightly go from ~3s (with `-Zself-profile`) to ~15s (with `-Zself-profile -Zself-profile-events=default,query-cache-hit`).
We'd like to add query cache hits to rustc-perf (https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/pull/2168), but there we only need the actualy cache hit counts, not the timestamp/thread ID metadata associated with it.
This PR adds a new `query-cache-hit-count` event. Instead of generating individual instant events, it simply aggregates cache hit counts per *query invocation* (so a combination of a query and its arguments, if I understand it correctly) using an atomic counter. At the end of the compilation session, these counts are then dumped to the self-profile log using integer events (in a similar fashion as how we record artifact sizes). I suppose that we could dedup the query invocations in rustc directly, but I don't think it's really required. In local experiments with the hello world + serde case, the query invocation records generated ~30 KiB more data in the self-profile, which was ~10% increase in this case.
With this PR, the overhead of `-Zself-profile` seems to be the same as before, at least on my machine, so I also enabled query cache hit counts by default when self profiling is enabled.
We should also modify `analyzeme`, specifically [this](https://github.com/rust-lang/measureme/blob/master/analyzeme/src/analysis.rs#L139), and make it load the integer events with query cache hit counts. I can do that as a follow-up, it's not required to be done in sync with this PR, and it doesn't require changes in rustc.
CC `@cjgillot`
r? `@oli-obk`
