Currently, we emit a "try adding a comma" suggestion if a comma is
missing in a struct definition. However, we emit no such suggestion if a
comma is missing in a struct initializer.
This commit adds a "try adding a comma" suggestion when we don't find a
comma during the parsing of a struct initializer field.
The change to `src/test/ui/parser/removed-syntax-with-1.stderr` isn't
great, but I don't see a good way of avoiding it.
Account for type params on method without parentheses
Account for those type parameters in the structured suggestion when forgetting to call method:
```
error[E0615]: attempted to take value of method `collect` on type `std::vec::IntoIter<_>`
--> $DIR/method-missing-parentheses.rs:2:32
|
LL | let _ = vec![].into_iter().collect::<usize>;
| ^^^^^^^---------
| |
| help: use parentheses to call the method: `collect::<usize>()`
```
change an instance of span_bug() to struct_span_err() to avoid ICE
After #67148, the `span_bug()` in `parse_ty_tuple_or_parens()` is reachable because `parse_paren_comma_seq()` can return an `Ok()` even in cases where it encounters an error.
This pull request prevents an ICE in such cases by replacing the `span_bug()` with `struct_span_error()`.
Fixes#68890.
parser: Keep current and previous tokens precisely
...including their unnormalized forms.
Add more documentation for them.
Hopefully, this will help to eliminate footguns like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68728#discussion_r373787486.
I'll try to address the FIXMEs in separate PRs during the next week.
r? @Centril
stop using BytePos for computing spans in librustc_parse/parser/mod.rs
Computing spans using logic such as `self.token.span.lo() + BytePos(1)` can cause internal compiler errors like #68730 when non-ascii characters are given as input.
#68735 partially addressed this problem, but only for one case. Moreover, its usage of `next_point()` does not actually align with what `bump_with()` expects. For example, given the token `>>=`, we should pass the span consisting of the final two characters `>=`, but `next_point()` advances the span beyond the end of the `=`.
This pull request instead computes the start of the new span by doing `start_point(self.token.span).hi()`. This matches `self.token.span.lo() + BytePos(1)` in the common case where the characters are ascii, and it gracefully handles multibyte characters.
Fixes#68783.
The previous commit wrapped `Parser` within a `Cow` for the hot macro
parsing path. As a result, there's no need for the `Cow` within
`Directory`, because it lies within `Parser`.
Tweak obligation error output
- Point at arguments or output when fn obligations come from them, or ident when they don't
- Point at `Sized` bound (fix#47990)
- When object unsafe trait uses itself in associated item suggest using `Self` (fix#66424, fix#33375, partially address #38376, cc #61525)
- Point at reason in object unsafe trait with `Self` in supertraits or `where`-clause (cc #40533, cc #68377)
- On implicit type parameter `Sized` obligations, suggest `?Sized` (fix#57744, fix#46683)
parser: syntactically allow `self` in all `fn` contexts
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68728.
`self` parameters are now *syntactically* allowed as the first parameter irrespective of item context (and in function pointers). Instead, semantic validation (`ast_validation`) is used.
r? @petrochenkov
Suggest path separator for single-colon typos
This commit adds guidance for when a user means to type a path, but ends
up typing a single colon, such as `<<Impl as T>:Ty>`.
This change seemed pertinent as the current error message is
particularly misleading, emitting `error: unmatched angle bracket`,
despite the angle bracket being matched later on, leaving the user to
track down the typo'd colon.
