Fix HIR printing of parameters
HIR pretty printing does the wrong thing for anonymous parameters, and there is no test coverage for it. This PR remedies both of those things.
r? ``@lcnr``
rustc_target: Add target features for LoongArch v1.1
This patch adds new target features for LoongArch v1.1:
* div32
* lam-bh
* lamcas
* ld-seq-sa
* scq
Provide helpful diagnostics for shebang lookalikes
When `[` is not found after a `#!`, a note will be added to the exisiting error
```
error: expected `[`, found `/`
--> src/main.rs:2:3
|
2 | #!/usr/bin/env -S cargo +nightly -Zscript
| ^ expected `[`
|
= note: the token sequence `#!` here looks like the start of a shebang interpreter directive but it is not
= help: if you meant this to be a shebang interpreter directive, move it to the very start of the file
```
Fixes#137249
r? `@fmease`
Remove an outdated line from a test comment
They *used* to not work, however this was fixed in the PR that added the test. I forgot to remove this line or possibly lost its removal while rebasing.
r? `@ehuss`
EUV: fix place of deref pattern's interior's scrutinee
The place previously used here was that of the temporary holding the reference returned by `Deref::deref` or `DerefMut::deref_mut`. However, since the inner pattern of `deref!(inner)` expects the deref-target type itself, this would ICE when that type was inspected (e.g. by the EUV case for slice patterns). This adds a deref projection to fix that.
Since current in-tree consumers of EUV (upvar inference and clippy) don't care about Rvalues, the place could be simplified to `self.cat_rvalue(pat.hir_id, self.pat_ty_adjusted(subpat)?)` to save some cycles. I personally find EUV to be a bit fragile, so I've opted for pedantic correctness. Maybe a `HACK` comment would suffice though?
Fixes#125059
r? `@compiler-errors`
Visit `PatField` when collecting lint levels
Fixes#138428
Side-note, I vaguely skimmed over the other nodes we could be visiting here and it doesn't *seem* to me that we're missing anything, though I may be mistaken given recent(?) support for attrs in where clauses(??). Can be fixed in a follow-up PR.
Allow more top-down inlining for single-BB callees
This means that things like `<usize as Step>::forward_unchecked` and `<PartialOrd for f32>::le` will inline even if
we've already done a bunch of inlining to find the calls to them.
Fixes#138136
~~Draft as it's built atop #138135, which adds a mir-opt test that's a nice demonstration of this. To see just this change, look at <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138157/commits/48f63e3be552605c2933056b77bf23a326757f92>~~ Rebased to be just the inlining change, as the other existing tests show it great.
Don't `alloca` just to look at a discriminant
Today we're making LLVM do a bunch of extra work when you match on trivial stuff like `Option<bool>` or `ControlFlow<u8>`.
This PR changes that so that simple types like `Option<u32>` or `Result<(), Box<Error>>` can stay as `OperandValue::ScalarPair` and we can still read the discriminant from them, rather than needing to write them into memory to have a `PlaceValue` just to get the discriminant out.
Fixes#137503
Currently (PatKind::Wild` (i.e. `_`) gets turned by
`lower_fn_params_to_names` into an empty identifier, which means it is
printed incorrectly by HIR pretty printing.
And likewise for `lower_fn_params_to_names`, which affects some error
messages.
This commit fixes them. This requires a slight tweak in a couple of
places to continue using parameter numbers in some error messages. And
it improves the output of `tests/ui/typeck/cyclic_type_ice.rs`:
`/* _ */` is a better suggestion than `/* */`.
They *used* to not work, however this was fixed in the PR that added the
test. I forgot to remove this line or possibly lost its removal while
rebasing.
Add an opt-out in pretty printing for RTN rendering
Today, we render RPITIT types like `impl Sized { T::method(..) }` when RTN is enabled. This is very useful for diagnostics, since it's often not clear what the `impl Sized` type means by itself, and it makes it clear that that's an RPITIT that can be bounded using RTN syntax. See #115624.
However, since we don't distinguish types that are rendered for the purposes of printing messages vs suggestions, this representation leaks into suggestions and turns into code that can't be parsed. This PR adds a new `with_types_for_suggestion! {}` and `with_types_for_signature! {}` options to the pretty printing architecture to make it clear that we're rendering a type for code suggestions.
This can be applied later as we find that we need it.
make precise capturing args in rustdoc Json typed
close#137616
This PR includes below changes.
- Add `rustc_hir::PreciseCapturingArgKind` which allows the query system to return a arg's data.
- Add `rustdoc::clean::types::PreciseCapturingArg` and change to use it.
- Add `rustdoc-json-types::PreciseCapturingArg` and change to use it.
- Update `tests/rustdoc-json/impl-trait-precise-capturing.rs`.
- Bump `rustdoc_json_types::FORMAT_VERSION`.
attempt to support `BinaryFormat::Xcoff` in `naked_asm!`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137219
So, the inline assembly support for xcoff is extremely limited. The LLVM [XCOFFAsmParser](1b25c0c4da/llvm/lib/MC/MCParser/XCOFFAsmParser.cpp) does not support many of the attributes that LLVM itself emits, and that should exist based on [the assembler docs](https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ssw_aix_71/assembler/assembler_pdf.pdf). It also does accept some that should not exist based on those docs.
So, I've tried to do the best I can given those limitations. At least it's better than emitting the directives for elf and having that fail somewhere deep in LLVM. Given that inline assembly for this target is incomplete (under `asm_experimental_arch`), I think that's OK (and again I don't see how we can do better given the limitations in LLVM).
r? ```@Noratrieb``` (given that you reviewed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136637)
It seems reasonable to ping the [`powerpc64-ibm-aix` target maintainers](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/platform-support/aix.html), hopefully they have thoughts too: ```@daltenty``` ```@gilamn5tr```
naked functions: on windows emit `.endef` without the symbol name
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138320
The `.endef` directive does not take the name as an argument. Apparently the LLVM x86_64 parser does accept this, but on i686 it's rejected. In general `i686` does some special name mangling stuff, so it's good to include it in the naked function tests.
r? ````@ChrisDenton```` (because windows)
The place previously used here was that of the temporary holding the
reference returned by `Deref::deref` or `DerefMut::deref_mut`. However,
since the inner pattern of `deref!(inner)` expects the deref-target type
itself, this would ICE when that type was inspected (e.g. by the EUV
case for slice patterns). This adds a deref projection to fix that.
Since current in-tree consumers of EUV (upvar inference and clippy)
don't care about Rvalues, the place could be simplified to
`self.cat_rvalue(pat.hir_id, self.pat_ty_adjusted(subpat)?)` to save
some cycles. I personally find EUV to be a bit fragile, so I've opted
for pedantic correctness. Maybe a `HACK` comment would suffice though?
This means that things like `<usize as Step>::forward_unchecked` and `<PartialOrd for f32>::le` will inline even if we've already done a bunch of inlining to find the calls to them.
Do not register `Self: AutoTrait` when confirming auto trait (in old solver)
Every built-in auto impl for a trait goal like `Ty: Auto` immediately registers another obligation of `Ty: Auto` as one of its nested obligations, leading to us stressing the cycle detection machinery a lot more than we need to. This is because all traits have a `Self: Trait` predicate.
To fix this, remove the call to `impl_or_trait_obligations` in `vtable_auto_impl`, since auto traits do not have where clauses.
r? lcnr
Use sa_sigaction instead of sa_union.__su_sigaction for AIX
Revert test cases to use `sa_sigaction` instead of `sa_union.__su_sigaction`, now that the `libc` crate implementation for AIX defines `sa_sigaction` as a direct member of `struct sigaction`, aligning it with implementations on other similar platforms. ([[AIX] Use sa_sigaction instead of the union](https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/pull/4250)).
Disentangle `ForwardGenericParamBan` and `ConstParamTy` ribs
In #137617, the `ConstParamTy` rib was adjusted to act kinda like the `ForwardGenericParamBan`. However, this means that it no longer served its purpose banning generics from *parent items*. Although we still are checking for param type validity using the `ConstParamTy_` trait, which means that we weren't accepting code we shouldn't, I think it's a bit strange for us not to be rejecting code like this during *resolution* and instead letting these malformed const generics leak into the type system:
```rust
trait Foo<T> {
fn bar<const N: T>() {}
}
```
This PR does a few things:
1. Introduce a `ForwardGenericParamBanReason` enum, and start using the `ForwardGenericParamBan` rib to ban forward-declared params in const tys when `generic_const_parameter_types` is enabled.
2. Start using the `ConstParamTy` rib to ban *all* generics when `generic_const_parameter_types` is disabled.
3. Improve the diagnostics for both of the cases above, and for forward-declared params in parameter defaults too :3
r? `@BoxyUwU` or reassign
Support rmeta inputs for --crate-type=bin --emit=obj
This already works for --emit=metadata, but is possible anytime we're not linking.
Tests:
- `rmeta_bin` checks we're not changing --emit=link (already passes)
- `rmeta_bin-pass` tests the new behavior for --emit=obj (would fail today) and also --emit=metadata which isn't changing
change definitely unproductive cycles to error
builds on top of #136824 by adding a third variant to `PathKind` for paths which may change to be coinductive in the future but must not be so right now. Most notably, impl where-clauses of not yet coinductive traits.
With this, we can change cycles which are definitely unproductive to a proper error. This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/114. This does not affect stable as we keep these cycles as ambiguous during coherence.
r? ````````@compiler-errors```````` ````````@nikomatsakis````````
