feat: Add incorrect case diagnostics for enum variant fields and all variables/params
Updates the incorrect case diagnostic to check:
1. Fields of enum variants. Example:
```rust
enum Foo {
Variant { nonSnake: u8 }
}
```
2. All variable bindings, instead of just let bindings and certain match arm patters. Examples:
```rust
match 1 { nonSnake => () }
match 1 { nonSnake @ 1 => () }
match 1 { nonSnake1 @ nonSnake2 => () } // slightly cursed, but these both introduce new
// bindings that are bound to the same value.
const ONE: i32 = 1;
match 1 { nonSnake @ ONE } // ONE is ignored since it is not a binding
match Some(1) { Some(nonSnake) => () }
struct Foo { field: u8 }
match (Foo { field: 1 } ) {
Foo { field: nonSnake } => ();
}
struct Foo { nonSnake: u8 } // diagnostic here, at definition
match (Foo { nonSnake: 1 } ) { // no diagnostic here...
Foo { nonSnake } => (); // ...or here, since these are not where the name is introduced
}
for nonSnake in [] {}
struct Foo(u8);
for Foo(nonSnake) in [] {}
```
3. All parameter bindings, instead of just top-level binding identifiers. Examples:
```rust
fn func(nonSnake: u8) {} // worked before
struct Foo { field: u8 }
fn func(Foo { field: nonSnake }: Foo) {} // now get diagnostic for nonSnake
```
This is accomplished by changing the way binding identifier patterns are filtered:
- Previously, all binding idents were skipped, except a few classes of "good" binding locations that were checked.
- Now, all binding idents are checked, except field shorthands which are skipped.
Moving from a whitelist to a blacklist potentially makes the analysis more brittle:
If new pattern types are added in the future where ident pats don't introduce new names, then they may incorrectly create diagnostics.
But the benefit of the blacklist approach is simplicity: I think a whitelist approach would need to recursively visit patterns to collect renaming candidates?
Trigger VSCode to rename after extract variable assist is applied
When the user applies the "Extract Variable" assist, the cursor is
positioned at the newly inserted variable. This commit adds a command
to the assist that triggers the rename action in VSCode. This way, the
user can quickly rename the variable after applying the assist.
Fixes part of: #17579https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cf38740-ab22-4b94-b0f1-eddd51c26c29
I haven't yet looked at the module or function extraction assists yet.
Implement symbol interning infra
Will fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/15590
My unsafe-fu is not the best but it does satisfy miri.
There is still some follow up work to do, notably a lot of places using strings instead of symbols/names, most notably the token tree.
When the user applies the "Extract Variable" assist, the cursor is
positioned at the newly inserted variable. This commit adds a command
to the assist that triggers the rename action in VSCode. This way, the
user can quickly rename the variable after applying the assist.
Fixes part of: #17579
Require a colon in `//@ normalize-*:` test headers
The previous parser for `//@ normalize-*` headers (before #126370) was so lax that it did not require `:` after the header name. As a result, the test suite contained a mix of with-colon and without-colon normalize headers, both numbering in the hundreds.
This PR updates the without-colon headers to add a colon (matching the style used by other headers), and then updates the parser to make the colon mandatory.
(Because the normalization parser only runs *after* the header system identifies a normalize header, this will detect and issue an error for relevant headers that lack the colon.)
Addresses one of the points of #126372.
feat: do not add new enum if it already exists
## Summary
This PR introduces a check for the existence of another enum within the current scope, and if it exist, we skip `add_enum_def`.
## Why?
Currently, when using the `bool_to_enum` assist more than once, it is possible to add multiple enum definitions. For example, the following snippet,
```rs
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
enum Bool {
True,
False,
}
fn main() {
let a = Bool::True;
let b = true;
println!("Hello, world!");
}
```
will be transformed into,
```rs
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
enum Bool {
True,
False,
}
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
enum Bool {
True,
False,
}
fn main() {
let a = Bool::True;
let b = Bool::True;
println!("Hello, world!");
}
```
This can be annoying for users to clean up.
Migrate `issue-83112-incr-test-moved-file`, `type-mismatch-same-crate-name` and `issue-109934-lto-debuginfo` `run-make` tests to rmake or ui
Part of #121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
I have noticed that the new UI test `debuginfo-lto-alloc` is outputting artifacts that aren't getting cleaned up because of its `-C incremental`. That might be the justification needed to keep it as a run-make test?
Try it on:
// try-job: test-various // previously passed
try-job: armhf-gnu
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc
