Allow `#![doc(test(attr(..)))]` everywhere
This PR adds the ability to specify [`#![doc(test(attr(..)))]`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustdoc/write-documentation/the-doc-attribute.html#testattr) ~~at module level~~ everywhere in addition to allowing it at crate-root.
This is motivated by a recent PR #140323 (by ````@tgross35)```` where we have to duplicate 2 attributes to every single `f16` and `f128` doctests, by allowing `#![doc(test(attr(..)))]` at module level (and everywhere else) we can omit them entirely and just have (in both module):
```rust
#![doc(test(attr(feature(cfg_target_has_reliable_f16_f128))))]
#![doc(test(attr(expect(internal_features))))]
```
Those new attributes are appended to the one found at crate-root or at a previous module. Those "global" attributes are compatible with merged doctests (they already were before).
Given the small addition that this is, I'm proposing to insta-stabilize it, but I can feature-gate it if preferred.
Best reviewed commit by commit.
r? ````@GuillaumeGomez````
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#137992 (Stabilise `os_string_pathbuf_leak`)
- rust-lang/rust#141558 (Limit the size of cgu names when using the `-Zhuman-readable-cgu-name…)
- rust-lang/rust#141797 (compiler: set Apple frame pointers by architecture)
- rust-lang/rust#141857 (coretests: move float tests from num to floats module and use a more flexible macro to generate them)
- rust-lang/rust#142045 (Make obligation cause code suggestions verbose)
- rust-lang/rust#142076 (Check documentation of bootstrap in PR CI)
- rust-lang/rust#142110 (Add solaris targets to build-manifest)
- rust-lang/rust#142131 (Make cast suggestions verbose)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Check documentation of bootstrap in PR CI
It's annoying when wrong doc comments in bootstrap [break](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141272#issuecomment-2943614152) `auto` CI. This has happened a few times recently, and documenting bootstrap with the stage0 compiler should be pretty quick, so let's add it to PR CI.
r? ``@marcoieni``
bootstrap: build std sans leaf frame pointers
Sometimes leaf frame-pointers can impact LLVM inlining choices, and that can be a real problem for things like `mul_add`.
modularize the config module bootstrap
Currently, our `config` module is quite large over 3,000 lines, and handles a wide range of responsibilities. This PR aims to break it down into smaller, more focused submodules to improve readability and maintainability:
* **`toml`**: Introduces a dedicated `toml` submodule within the `config` module. Its sole purpose is to define configuration-related structs along with their corresponding deserialization logic. It also contains the `parse_inner` method, which serves as the central function for extracting relevant information from the TOML structs and constructing the final configuration.
* **`rust`, `dist`, `install`, `llvm`, `build`, `gcc`, and others**: Each of these modules contains TOML subsections specific to their domain, along with the logic necessary to convert them into parts of the final configuration struct.
* **`config/mod.rs`**: Contains shared types and enums used across multiple TOML subsections.
* **`config/config.rs`**: Houses the logic that integrates all the TOML subsections into the complete configuration struct.
r? `@kobzol`
Replace some `Option<Span>` with `Span` and use DUMMY_SP instead of None
Turns out many locations actually have a span available that we could use, so I used it
Add a new `mismatched-lifetime-syntaxes` lint
The lang-team [discussed this](https://hackmd.io/nf4ZUYd7Rp6rq-1svJZSaQ) and I attempted to [summarize](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120808#issuecomment-2701863833) their decision. The summary-of-the-summary is:
- Using two different kinds of syntax for elided lifetimes is confusing. In rare cases, it may even [lead to unsound code](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48686)! Some examples:
```rust
// Lint will warn about these
fn(v: ContainsLifetime) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
fn(&'static u8) -> &u8;
```
- Matching up references with no lifetime syntax, references with anonymous lifetime syntax, and paths with anonymous lifetime syntax is an exception to the simplest possible rule:
```rust
// Lint will not warn about these
fn(&u8) -> &'_ u8;
fn(&'_ u8) -> &u8;
fn(&u8) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
```
- Having a lint for consistent syntax of elided lifetimes will make the [future goal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91639) of warning-by-default for paths participating in elision much simpler.
---
This new lint attempts to accomplish the goal of enforcing consistent syntax. In the process, it supersedes and replaces the existing `elided-named-lifetimes` lint, which means it starts out life as warn-by-default.
bootstrap: Fix file permissions when dereferencing symlinks
## Problem
When copying files in the bootstrap process with `dereference_symlinks = true`, we're incorrectly using the symlink's metadata to set permissions on the copied regular file, which results in the following error:
```
Warning: Failed to set file times for "/build/nix-build-rustc-1.86.0.drv-0/rustc-1.86.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/llvm-strip" (permissions: Permissions(FilePermissions { mode: 0o100000 (----------) })) error: Permission denied (os error 13)
```
Verbose Logs confirming the error:
```
TRACE: Found llvm-strip copy operation
Source: /n/nix/tech/store/n34yzv2n50p6lbjmx089vjym121wbl4j-llvm-19.1.7/bin/llvm-strip
Destination: /build/nix-build-rustc-1.86.0.drv-0/rustc-1.86.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/llvm-strip
Source is_symlink (via symlink_metadata): true
Source symlink_metadata permissions: 120000
Source symlink_metadata file_type: FileType { is_file: false, is_dir: false, is_symlink: true, .. }
Source is symlink pointing to: llvm-objcopy
Source raw mode: 120000
Source filetype: 120000
Setting permissions: Permissions(FilePermissions { mode: 0o120000 (l---------) })
Permission mode to set: 120000
Raw permission bits: 120000
File type bits being set: 120000
Permission bits being set: 0
WARNING: Attempting to set symlink file type (120000) on regular file!
WARNING: Setting zero permission bits will make file inaccessible!
Destination permissions after set_permissions: 100000
```
## Solution
After canonicalizing a symlink path, fetch the metadata of the target file instead of continuing to use the symlink's metadata. This ensures:
- Correct file type detection
- Proper permission bits for the target file
- Maintains existing behavior for non-symlink cases
## Testing
Verified fix resolves permission errors:
```
rustc> llvm-strip: Original metadata mode: 120000, is_symlink: true
rustc> llvm-strip: Target metadata mode after fix: 100555
rustc> llvm-strip: Final permissions mode: 100555
```
rustdoc-json-type: Depend on `serde` and `serde_derive` seperately
Before this commit, serde_derive is built before serde. But serde does not depend on serde_derive, so that is not needed. Instead, build serde and serde_derive in parallel.
This speeds up compilation for users depending on rustdoc-json-types out of tree.
Imports: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustdoc-types/pull/49
CC ``@Enselic``
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
jsondocck: Refactor directive handling
Best reviewed commit by commit.
1. Moves directive handling into its own file. This makes it easier to link to in the dev-guide (https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/2422#discussion_r2112724234), but also makes the code nicer in it's own right
2. Renames command to directive. This is what compiletest uses, and it's nice to not have 2 words for this.
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
UnsafePinned: also include the effects of UnsafeCell
This tackles https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137750 by including an `UnsafeCell` in `UnsafePinned`, thus imbuing it with all the usual properties of interior mutability (no `noalias` nor `dereferenceable` on shared refs, special treatment by Miri's aliasing model). The soundness issue is not fixed yet because coroutine lowering does not use `UnsafePinned`.
The RFC said that `UnsafePinned` would not permit mutability on shared references, but since then, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137750 has demonstrated that this is not tenable. In the face of those examples, I propose that we do the "obvious" thing and permit shared mutable state inside `UnsafePinned`. This seems loosely consistent with the fact that we allow going from `Pin<&mut T>` to `&T` (where the former can be aliased with other pointers that perform mutation, and hence the same goes for the latter) -- but the `as_ref` example shows that we in fact would need to add this `UnsafeCell` even if we didn't have a safe conversion to `&T`, since for the compiler and Miri, `&T` and `Pin<&T>` are basically the same type.
To make this possible, I had to remove the `Copy` and `Clone` impls for `UnsafePinned`.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125735
Cc ``@rust-lang/lang`` ``@rust-lang/opsem`` ``@Sky9x``
I don't think this needs FCP since the type is still unstable -- we'll finally decide whether we like this approach when `UnsafePinned` is moved towards stabilization (IOW, this PR is reversible). However, I'd still like to make sure that the lang team is okay with the direction I am proposing here.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#141890 (Add link to correct documentation in htmldocck.py)
- rust-lang/rust#141932 (Fix for async drop inside async gen fn)
- rust-lang/rust#141960 (Use non-2015 edition paths in tests that do not test for their resolution)
- rust-lang/rust#141968 (Run wfcheck in one big loop instead of per module)
- rust-lang/rust#141969 (Triagebot: Remove `assign.users_on_vacation`)
- rust-lang/rust#141985 (Ensure query keys are printed with reduced queries)
- rust-lang/rust#141999 (Visit the ident in `PreciseCapturingNonLifetimeArg`.)
- rust-lang/rust#142005 (Change `tag_field` to `FieldIdx` in `Variants::Multiple`)
- rust-lang/rust#142017 (Fix incorrect use of "recommend" over "recommended")
- rust-lang/rust#142024 (Don't refer to 'this tail expression' in expansion.)
- rust-lang/rust#142025 (Don't refer to 'local binding' in extern macro.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Run wfcheck in one big loop instead of per module
Maybe we can merge this big loop in the future with the `par_hir_body_owners` call below and run typeck only on items that didn't fail wfcheck. For now let's just see if perf likes it, as it by itself should be beneficial to parallel rustc
Fix incorrect eq_unspanned in TokenStream
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141522
r? ``@workingjubilee``
should we remove this function?
since it's used in several places, i'd prefer to keep it.
redesign stage 0 std follow-ups part2
Fixes three bugs:
1. `x check` fails when run on rustdoc without `download-rustc` enabled. (1st commit)
2. `x check` fails when run on the compiler with `download-rustc` enabled. (2nd commit)
3. `x test library` fails with `download-rustc` enabled. (3rd commit)
Fixesrust-lang/rust#142018 (case 1)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141983 (case 3)
