In preparation for incremental compilation this commit refactors the lint
handling infrastructure in the compiler to be more "eager" and overall more
incremental-friendly. Many passes of the compiler can emit lints at various
points but before this commit all lints were buffered in a table to be emitted
at the very end of compilation. This commit changes these lints to be emitted
immediately during compilation using pre-calculated lint level-related data
structures.
Linting today is split into two phases, one set of "early" lints run on the
`syntax::ast` and a "late" set of lints run on the HIR. This commit moves the
"early" lints to running as late as possible in compilation, just before HIR
lowering. This notably means that we're catching resolve-related lints just
before HIR lowering. The early linting remains a pass very similar to how it was
before, maintaining context of the current lint level as it walks the tree.
Post-HIR, however, linting is structured as a method on the `TyCtxt` which
transitively executes a query to calculate lint levels. Each request to lint on
a `TyCtxt` will query the entire crate's 'lint level data structure' and then go
from there about whether the lint should be emitted or not.
The query depends on the entire HIR crate but should be very quick to calculate
(just a quick walk of the HIR) and the red-green system should notice that the
lint level data structure rarely changes, and should hopefully preserve
incrementality.
Overall this resulted in a pretty big change to the test suite now that lints
are emitted much earlier in compilation (on-demand vs only at the end). This in
turn necessitated the addition of many `#![allow(warnings)]` directives
throughout the compile-fail test suite and a number of updates to the UI test
suite.
Point at path segment on module not found
Point at the correct path segment on a import statement where a module
doesn't exist.
New output:
```rust
error[E0432]: unresolved import `std::bar`
--> <anon>:1:10
|
1 | use std::bar::{foo1, foo2};
| ^^^ Could not find `bar` in `std`
```
instead of:
```rust
error[E0432]: unresolved import `std::bar::foo1`
--> <anon>:1:16
|
1 | use std::bar::{foo1, foo2};
| ^^^^ Could not find `bar` in `std`
error[E0432]: unresolved import `std::bar::foo2`
--> <anon>:1:22
|
1 | use std::bar::{foo1, foo2};
| ^^^^ Could not find `bar` in `std`
```
Fix#43040.
Point at the correct path segment on a import statement where a module
doesn't exist.
New output:
```rust
error[E0432]: unresolved import `std::bar`
--> <anon>:1:10
|
1 | use std::bar::{foo1, foo2};
| ^^^ Could not find `bar` in `std`
```
instead of:
```rust
error[E0432]: unresolved import `std::bar::foo1`
--> <anon>:1:16
|
1 | use std::bar::{foo1, foo2};
| ^^^^ Could not find `bar` in `std`
error[E0432]: unresolved import `std::bar::foo2`
--> <anon>:1:22
|
1 | use std::bar::{foo1, foo2};
| ^^^^ Could not find `bar` in `std`
```
When there're more than one suggestions in the same diagnostic, they are
displayed in their own block, instead of inline. In order to reduce
confusion, those blocks now display the line number.
Prior to this PR, when we aborted because a "critical pass" failed, we
displayed the number of errors from that critical pass. While that's the
number of errors that caused compilation to abort in *that place*,
that's not what people really want to know. Instead, always report the
total number of errors, and don't bother to track the number of errors
from the last pass that failed.
This changes the compiler driver API to handle errors more smoothly,
and therefore is a compiler-api-[breaking-change].
Fixes#42793.
Decompose Adjustment into smaller steps and remove the method map.
The method map held method callee information for:
* actual method calls (`x.f(...)`)
* overloaded unary, binary, indexing and call operators
* *every overloaded deref adjustment* (many can exist for each expression)
That last one was a historical ~~accident~~ hack, and part of the motivation for this PR, along with:
* a desire to compose adjustments more freely
* containing the autoderef logic better to avoid mutation within an inference snapshot
* not creating `TyFnDef` types which are incompatible with the original one
* i.e. we used to take a`TyFnDef`'s `for<'a> &'a T -> &'a U` signature and instantiate `'a` using a region inference variable, *then* package the resulting `&'b T -> &'b U` signature in another `TyFnDef`, while keeping *the same* `DefId` and `Substs`
* to fix#3548 by explicitly writing autorefs for the RHS of comparison operators
Individual commits tell their own story, of "atomic" changes avoiding breaking semantics.
Future work based on this PR could include:
* removing the signature from `TyFnDef`, now that it's always "canonical"
* some questions of variance remain, as subtyping *still* treats the signature differently
* moving part of the typeck logic for methods, autoderef and coercion into `rustc::traits`
* allowing LUB coercions (joining multiple expressions) to "stack up" many adjustments
* transitive coercions (e.g. reify or unsize after multiple steps of autoderef)
r? @nikomatsakis
On recursive types of infinite size, point at all the fields that make
the type recursive.
```rust
struct Foo {
bar: Bar,
}
struct Bar {
foo: Foo,
}
```
outputs
```
error[E0072]: recursive type `Foo` has infinite size
--> file.rs:1:1
1 | struct Foo {
| _^ starting here...
2 | | bar: Bar,
| | -------- recursive here
3 | | }
| |_^ ...ending here: recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `Foo` representable
error[E0072]: recursive type `Bar` has infinite size
--> file.rs:5:1
|
5 | struct Bar {
| _^ starting here...
6 | | foo: Foo,
| | -------- recursive here
7 | | }
| |_^ ...ending here: recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `Bar` representable
```
Minimize single span suggestions into a label
changes
```
14 | println!("☃{}", tup[0]);
| ^^^^^^
|
help: to access tuple elements, use tuple indexing syntax as shown
| println!("☃{}", tup.0);
```
into
```
14 | println!("☃{}", tup[0]);
| ^^^^^^ to access tuple elements, use `tup.0`
```
Also makes suggestions explicit in the backend in preparation of adding multiple suggestions to a single diagnostic. Currently that's already possible, but results in a full help message + modified code snippet per suggestion, and has no rate limit (might show 100+ suggestions).
When a span starts on a line with nothing but whitespace to the left,
and there are no other annotations in that line, simplify the visual
representation of the span.
Go from:
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `A` has infinite size
--> file2.rs:1:1
|
1 | struct A {
| _^ starting here...
2 | | a: A,
3 | | }
| |_^ ...ending here: recursive type has infinite size
|
```
To:
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `A` has infinite size
--> file2.rs:1:1
|
1 | / struct A {
2 | | a: A,
3 | | }
| |_^ recursive type has infinite size
```
Remove `starting here...`/`...ending here` labels from all multiline
diagnostics.
Add a way to get shorter spans until `char` for pointing at defs
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `X` has infinite size
--> file.rs:10:1
|
10 | struct X {
| ^^^^^^^^ recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `X` representable
```
vs
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `X` has infinite size
--> file.rs:10:1
|
10 | struct X {
| _^ starting here...
11 | | x: X,
12 | | }
| |_^ ...ending here: recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `X` representable
```
Re: #35965, #38246. Follow up to #38328.
r? @jonathandturner
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `X` has infinite size
--> file.rs:10:1
|
10 | struct X {
| ^^^^^^^^ recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `X` representable
```
vs
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `X` has infinite size
--> file.rs:10:1
|
10 | struct X {
| _^ starting here...
11 | | x: X,
12 | | }
| |_^ ...ending here: recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `X` representable
```
Explicit help message for binop type mismatch
When trying to do `1 + Some(2)`, or some other binary operation on two
types different types without an appropriate trait implementation, provide
an explicit help message:
```rust
help: `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>` has no implementation
```
Re: #39579, #38564, #37626, #39942, #34698.
When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for
example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message:
```
note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>`
```
Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
