resolve: Block expansion of a derive container until all its derives are resolved
So, it turns out there's one more reason to block expansion of a `#[derive]` container until all the derives inside it are resolved, beside `Copy` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63248).
The set of derive helper attributes registered by derives in the container also has to be known before the derives themselves are expanded, otherwise it may be too late (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63468#issuecomment-524550872 and the `#[stable_hasher]`-related test failures in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63468).
So, we stop our attempts to unblock the container earlier, as soon as the `Copy` status is known, and just block until all its derives are resolved.
After all the derives are resolved we immediately go and process their helper attributes in the item, without delaying it until expansion of the individual derives.
Unblocks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63468
r? @matthewjasper (as a reviewer of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63248)
cc @c410-f3r
Also mark derive helpers as known as a part of the derive container's expansion instead of expansion of the derives themselves which may happen too late.
Traces already contain module info without that.
It's easy to forget to call `finalize_*` on a module.
In particular, macros enum and trait modules weren't finalized.
By happy accident macros weren't placed into those modules until now.
Test HRTB issue accepted by compiler
Hi! First Rust PR, so if anything needs changing just let me know and I'll take care of it right away.
Closes#50301 which was marked E-needstest
Tweak mismatched types error
- Change expected/found for type mismatches in `break`
- Be more accurate when talking about diverging match arms
- Tweak wording of function without a return value
- Suggest calling bare functions when their return value can be coerced to the expected type
- Give more parsing errors when encountering `foo(_, _, _)`
Fix#51767, fix#62677, fix#63136, cc #37384, cc #35241, cc #51669.
Don't recommend `extern crate` syntax
`extern crate` syntax is not a good recommendation any more, so I've changed it to just print a suggested crate name.
