Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101967 (Move `unix_socket_abstract` feature API to `SocketAddrExt`.)
- #102470 (Stabilize const char convert)
- #104223 (Recover from function pointer types with generic parameter list)
- #104229 (Don't print full paths in overlap errors)
- #104294 (Don't ICE with inline const errors during MIR build)
- #104332 (Fixed some `_i32` notation in `maybe_uninit`’s doc)
- #104349 (fix some typos in comments)
- #104350 (Fix x finding Python on Windows)
- #104356 (interpret: make check_mplace public)
- #104364 (rustdoc: Resolve doc links in external traits having local impls)
- #104378 (Bump chalk to v0.87)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove unused symbols and diagnostic items
As the title suggests, this removes unused symbols from `sym::` and `#[rustc_diagnostic_item]` annotations that weren't mentioned anywhere.
Originally I tried to use grep, to find symbols and item names that are never mentioned via `sym::name`, however this produced a lot of false positives (?), for example clippy matching on `Symbol::as_str` or macros "implicitly" adding `sym::`. I ended up fixing all these false positives (?) by hand, but tbh I'm not sure if it was worth it...
Wrap bundled static libraries into object files
Fixes#103044 (not sure, couldn't test locally)
Bundled static libraries should be wrapped into object files as it's done for metadata file.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Don't print full paths in overlap errors
We don't print the full path in other diagnostics -- I don't think it particularly helps with the error message. I also delayed the printing until actually needing to render the error message.
r? diagnostics
Recover from function pointer types with generic parameter list
Give a more helpful error when encountering function pointer types with a generic parameter list like `fn<'a>(&'a str) -> bool` or `fn<T>(T) -> T` and suggest moving lifetime parameters to a `for<>` parameter list.
I've added a bunch of extra code to properly handle (unlikely?) corner cases like `for<'a> fn<'b>()` (where there already exists a `for<>` parameter list) correctly suggesting `for<'a, 'b> fn()` (merging the lists). If you deem this useless, I can simplify the code by suggesting nothing at all in this case.
I am quite open to suggestions regarding the wording of the diagnostic messages.
Fixes#103487.
``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics
r? diagnostics
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #103709 (ci: Upgrade dist-x86_64-netbsd to NetBSD 9.0)
- #103744 (Upgrade cc for working is_flag_supported on cross-compiles)
- #104105 (llvm: dwo only emitted when object code emitted)
- #104158 (Return .efi extension for EFI executable)
- #104181 (Add a few known-bug tests)
- #104266 (Regression test for coercion of mut-ref to dyn-star)
- #104300 (Document `Path::parent` behavior around relative paths)
- #104304 (Enable profiler in dist-s390x-linux)
- #104362 (Add `delay_span_bug` to `AttrWrapper::take_for_recovery`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `delay_span_bug` to `AttrWrapper::take_for_recovery`
`take_for_recovery` should only be used for recovery (when we should already have an error), so using `delay_span_bug` seems appropriate.
cc `@Aaron1011` (you've added the `FIXME` that this pr fixes)
llvm: dwo only emitted when object code emitted
Fixes#103932.
`CompiledModule` should not think a DWARF object was emitted when a bitcode-only compilation has happened, this can confuse archive file creation (which expects to create an archive containing non-existent dwo files).
r? ``````@michaelwoerister``````
ci: Upgrade dist-x86_64-netbsd to NetBSD 9.0
This is another step in toolchain upgrades for LLVM 16, which will need at least GCC 7.1.
Our previous NetBSD 8.0 cross-toolchain used its system GCC 5.5. While there are newer versions available in pkgsrc, I could not get those working for cross-compilation. Upgrading to NetBSD 9.0 gets us GCC 7.4, which is sufficient for now.
This will affect the compatibility of the build we ship for `x86_64-unknown-netbsd`, but others may still build their own from source if that is needed. It is expected that NetBSD 8 will reach EOL soon anyway, approximately one month after 10 is released, but there is no firm date for that.
Use `derive_const` and rm manual StructuralEq impl
This does not change any semantics of the impl except for the const stability. It should be fine because trait methods and const bounds can never be used in stable without enabling `const_trait_impl`.
cc `@oli-obk`
