compiler: mostly-finish `rustc_abi` updates
This almost-finishes all the updates in the compiler to use `rustc_abi` and removes some of the reexports of `rustc_abi` items in `rustc_target` that were previously available.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
An `if … { … } else { … }` used as the left operand of a binary
expression requires parentheses to be parsed as an expression.
Fix#11141
changelog: [`obfuscated_if_else`]: fix bug in suggestion by issuing
required parentheses around the left side of a binary expression
While extending the `option_map_or_err_ok` lint (warn by default,
"style") to recognize η-expanded forms of `Ok`, as in
```rust
// Should suggest `opt.ok_or("foobar")`
let _ = opt.map_or(Err("foobar"), |x| Ok(x));
```
I discovered that the `manual_ok_or` lint (allow by default, "pedantic")
already covered exactly the cases handled by `option_map_or_err_ok`,
including the one I was adding. Apparently, `option_map_or_err_ok` was
added without realizing that the lint already existed under the
`manual_ok_or` name. As a matter of fact, artifacts of this second lint
were even present in the first lint `stderr` file and went unnoticed for
more than a year.
This PR:
- deprecates `option_map_or_err_ok` with a message saying to use
`manual_ok_or`
- moves `manual_ok_or` from "pedantic" to "style" (the category in which
`option_map_or_err_ok` was)
In addition, I think that this lint, which is short, machine applicable,
and leads to shorter and clearer code with less arguments (`Ok`
disappears) and the removal of one level of call (`Err(x)` is replaced
by `x`), is a reason by itself to be in "style".
changelog: [`option_map_or_err_ok` and `manual_ok_or`]: move
`manual_ok_or` from "pedantic" to "style", and deprecate the redundant
style lint `option_map_or_err_ok`.
Removing the `.as_ref()` or `.as_mut()` as the top-level expression in a
closure may change the type of the result. In this case, it may be
better not to lint rather than proposing a fix that would not work.
changelog: [`useless_asref`]: do not remove the `.as_ref()` or
`.as_mut()` call if this would change the type of the enclosing closure
Fix#14088
By assuming that a recursive type is normalizable within the deeper
calls to `is_normalizable_helper()`, more cases can be handled by this
function.
In order to fix stack overflows, a recursion limit has also been added
for recursive generic type instantiations.
Fix#9798Fix#10508Fix#11915
changelog: [`large_enum_variant`]: more precise detection of variants
with large size differences
Proposing to replace
```rust
let mut x = PathBuf::from("/foo");
x.push("/bar");
```
by
```rust
let mut x = PathBuf::from("/foo");
x.push("bar");
```
changes the content of `x` (`/bar` ⇒ `/foo/bar`). This is not equivalent
and should not be `MachineApplicable`, even if the original code is
suspicious.
changelog: none
Fix the version of `doc_overindented_list_items`. It actually will be in
1.86.0, not 1.80.0.
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136209 has a milestone of
1.86.0)
changelog: none
- `reindent_multiline()` always returns the result of
`reindent_multiline_inner()` which returns a `String`. Make
`reindent_multiline()` return a `String` as well, instead of a
systematically owned `Cow<'_, str>`.
- There is no reason for `reindent_multiline()` to force a caller to
build a `Cow<'_, str>` instead of passing a `&str` directly, especially
considering that a `String` will always be returned.
Also, both the input parameter and return value (of type `Cow<'_, str>`)
shared the same (elided) lifetime for no reason: this worked only
because the result was always the `Cow::Owned` variant which is
compatible with any lifetime.
As a consequence, the signature changes from:
```rust
fn reindent_multiline(s: Cow<'_, str>, …) -> Cow<'_, str> { … }
```
to
```rust
fn reindent_multiline(s: &str, …) -> String { … }
```
changelog: none
`MachineApplicable` is appropriate for the applicability of this lint.
changelog: [`if_then_some_else_none`]: change the applicability to
`MachineApplicable`
Labeled blocks cannot be used as-is in the "then" or "else" part of an
`if` expression. They must be enclosed in an anonymous block.
Fix#14099
changelog: [`match_bool`]: fix suggestion when the rewritten block has a
label
fixes#12407
I think it is meaningful to emit a warning even if the span is in a
macro.
changelog: [`manual_async_fn`]: don't emit suggestion inside macro
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136073 (Always compute coroutine layout for eagerly emitting recursive layout errors)
- #136235 (Pretty print pattern type values with transmute if they don't satisfy their pattern)
- #136311 (Ensure that we never try to monomorphize the upcasting or vtable calls of impossible dyn types)
- #136315 (Use short ty string for binop and unop errors)
- #136393 (Fix accidentally not emitting overflowing literals lints anymore in patterns)
- #136435 (Simplify some code for lowering THIR patterns)
- #136630 (Change two std process tests to not output to std{out,err}, and fix test suite stat reset in bootstrap CI test rendering)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
Fix accidentally not emitting overflowing literals lints anymore in patterns
This was regressed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134228 (not in beta yet).
The issue was that previously we nested `hir::Expr` inside `hir::PatKind::Lit`, so it was linted by the expression code.
So now I've set it up for visitors to be able to directly visit literals and get all literals
tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all `Lrc`, replaced with `Arc`
tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all `Lrc`, replaced with `Arc`
This is continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132282 .
I'm pretty sure I did everything right. In particular, I searched all occurrences of `Lrc` in submodules and made sure that they don't need replacement.
There are other possibilities, through.
We can define `enum Lrc<T> { Rc(Rc<T>), Arc(Arc<T>) }`. Or we can make `Lrc` a union and on every clone we can read from special thread-local variable. Or we can add a generic parameter to `Lrc` and, yes, this parameter will be everywhere across all codebase.
So, if you think we should take some alternative approach, then don't merge this PR. But if it is decided to stick with `Arc`, then, please, merge.
cc "Parallel Rustc Front-end" ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113349 )
r? SparrowLii
`@rustbot` label WG-compiler-parallel
