The lint for function calls was previously restricted to functions taking
exactly one argument. This was not documented.
Generalizing the lint to an arbitrary number of arguments in the function
call requires special casing some macro expansions from the standard
library. Macros such as `panic!()` or `assert_eq!()` exist since Rust
1.0.0, but modern stdlib expand those macros into calls to functions
introduced in later Rust versions. While it is desirable to lint code
inside macros, using MSRV-incompatible functions coming from `core`
in macro expansions has been special-cased to not trigger this lint.
Also, code coming from compiler desugaring may contain function calls
(for example, `a..=b` is now desugared into `RangeInclusive::new(a,
b)`. Those should not be linted either as the compiler is allowed to
use unstable function calls.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13169
Late lints now use a parent iter to check for `#[clippy::msrv]`
attributes instead of keeping track with `extract_msrv_attr`. This is
required for incremental lints since they run per module instead of per
crate so don't visit all the necessary attributes
As a basic optimisation if no `#[clippy::msrv]` attributes are
discovered in early passes the HIR access is skipped completely and just
the configured MSRV is used, for most code bases this will be the case
changelog: none
node_args doesn't work with struct literals and expr_ty must be used
instead
r? @y21
changelog: none
(No changelog, as this ICE didn't make it to the Rust repo, as it was
caught during the sync)
Fixes#14325
Clean up TypeckResults::extract_binding_mode
- Remove the `Option` from the result type, as `None` is never returned.
- Document the difference from the `BindingMode` in `PatKind::Binding`.
By default, lintcheck will use the `clippy.toml` file found at the
toplevel of the repository (`CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR`). This file is meant
for configuration of Clippy applied to Clippy sources.
This creates a new `lintcheck/ci-config/clippy.toml` file which is used
by the CI when running lintcheck. By default this uses the default
Clippy configuration.
Out of cycle sync, as it is complicated and confusing to resolve merge
conflicts on the Rust side. This needs review for
eda3e649a41e0e73cb2e3ee6b98cbf8d7c12acae and
4d8766caaf11a14194406b8997243bb626000aae as well as the comment I'll
leave below.
changelog: none
This feature was stabilized, so the FormatArgs lints should check if the MSRV of
the stabilization is met, rather than checking if the feature is enabled.
It is not possible to write a declarative macro, that produces an
attribute w/o
an item attached to it. This means that the `check_item` will already
insert the
span in the map, if it came from an expansion. So additionally checking
if the
macro came from an expansion doesn't add anything here. So the
`check_attribute` function, and with that the problematic `attr.span()`
call can
be completely removed.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/14303
r? @y21
cc @jdonszelmann
changelog: Fix ICE in [`macro_use_import`] lint
It is not possible to write a declarative macro, that produces an attribute w/o
an item attached to it. This means that the `check_item` will already insert the
span in the map, if it came from an expansion. So additionally checking if the
macro came from an expansion doesn't add anything here. So the
`check_attribute` function, and with that the problematic `attr.span()` call can
be completely removed.
Fixes#14303
The `looks_like_refdef` function was assuming the range was valid, this
just adds a check to ensure that is the case. It also works around a
subtraction underflow due to the same invalid range.
changelog: [`doc_nested_refdefs`]: Fix#14287 by avoiding invalid ranges
The `has_eligible_receiver()` function had been adapted *a minima* when
the `sym::ControlFlow` diagnostic item has been added to rustc. This
refactors the function content to make its meaning clearer.
It mirrors `ExprKind::Binary`, and contains a `BinOpKind`. This makes
`AssocOp` more like `ExprKind`. Note that the variants removed from
`AssocOp` are all named differently to `BinOpToken`, e.g. `Multiply`
instead of `Mul`, so that's an inconsistency removed.
The commit adds `precedence` and `fixity` methods to `BinOpKind`, and
calls them from the corresponding methods in `AssocOp`. This avoids the
need to create an `AssocOp` from a `BinOpKind` in a bunch of places, and
`AssocOp::from_ast_binop` is removed.
`AssocOp::to_ast_binop` is also no longer needed.
Overall things are shorter and nicer.
`AssocOp::AssignOp` contains a `BinOpToken`. `ExprKind::AssignOp`
contains a `BinOpKind`. Given that `AssocOp` is basically a cut-down
version of `ExprKind`, it makes sense to make `AssocOp` more like
`ExprKind`. Especially given that `AssocOp` and `BinOpKind` use semantic
operation names (e.g. `Mul`, `Div`), but `BinOpToken` uses syntactic
names (e.g. `Star`, `Slash`).
This results in more concise code, and removes the need for various
conversions. (Note that the removed functions `hirbinop2assignop` and
`astbinop2assignop` are semantically identical, because `hir::BinOp` is
just a synonum for `ast::BinOp`!)
The only downside to this is that it allows the possibility of some
nonsensical combinations, such as `AssocOp::AssignOp(BinOpKind::Lt)`.
But `ExprKind::AssignOp` already has that problem. The problem can be
fixed for both types in the future with some effort, by introducing an
`AssignOpKind` type.
When the manually stripped entity receives a name as the first use
through a simple `let` statement, this name can be used in the generated
`if let Some(…)` expression instead of a placeholder.
Fix#14183
changelog: [`manual_strip`]: reuse existing identifier in suggestion
when possible
For some reason, the `todo!` and `unimplemented!` macros were not
included in the list of format-supporting macros list. Since they seem
to behave exactly the same as all others like `write!` and `assert!`,
adding them now.
I wonder if we should delete the `FORMAT_MACRO_DIAG_ITEMS`, and instead
tag all macros with the `#[clippy::format_args]`?
changelog: all format-handling lints will now validate `todo!` and
`unimplemented!` macros.
These method chains can be expressed concisely with `if`/`else`.
changelog: [`obfuscated_if_else`]: support `then().unwrap_or_else()` and
`then_some().unwrap_or_else()`
