Add #[track_caller] for some function in core::mem.
These functions can panic for some types. This makes the panic point to the code that calls e.g. mem::uninitialized(), instead of inside the definition of mem::uninitialized.
These functions can panic for some types. This makes the panic point to
the code that calls e.g. mem::uninitialized(), instead of inside the
definition of mem::uninitialized.
CTFE/Miri engine Pointer type overhaul
This fixes the long-standing problem that we are using `Scalar` as a type to represent pointers that might be integer values (since they point to a ZST). The main problem is that with int-to-ptr casts, there are multiple ways to represent the same pointer as a `Scalar` and it is unclear if "normalization" (i.e., the cast) already happened or not. This leads to ugly methods like `force_mplace_ptr` and `force_op_ptr`.
Another problem this solves is that in Miri, it would make a lot more sense to have the `Pointer::offset` field represent the full absolute address (instead of being relative to the `AllocId`). This means we can do ptr-to-int casts without access to any machine state, and it means that the overflow checks on pointer arithmetic are (finally!) accurate.
To solve this, the `Pointer` type is made entirely parametric over the provenance, so that we can use `Pointer<AllocId>` inside `Scalar` but use `Pointer<Option<AllocId>>` when accessing memory (where `None` represents the case that we could not figure out an `AllocId`; in that case the `offset` is an absolute address). Moreover, the `Provenance` trait determines if a pointer with a given provenance can be cast to an integer by simply dropping the provenance.
I hope this can be read commit-by-commit, but the first commit does the bulk of the work. It introduces some FIXMEs that are resolved later.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/841
Miri PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1851
r? `@oli-obk`
Checking that function is const if marked with rustc_const_unstable
Fixes#69630
This one is still missing tests to check the behavior but I checked by hand and it seemed to work.
I would not mind some direction for writing those unit tests!
remove trailing newline
fix: test with attribute but missing const
Update compiler/rustc_passes/src/stability.rs
Co-authored-by: Léo Lanteri Thauvin <leseulartichaut@gmail.com>
Add test for extern functions
fix: using span_help instead of span_suggestion
add test for some ABIs + fmt fix
Update compiler/rustc_passes/src/stability.rs
Co-authored-by: Léo Lanteri Thauvin <leseulartichaut@gmail.com>
Refractor and add test for `impl const`
Add test to make sure no output + cleanup condition
-----------------------------
remove stdcall test, failing CI test
C abi is already tested in this, so it is not that useful to test another one.
The tested code is blind to which specific ABI for now, as long as it's not an intrinsic one
Support allocation failures when interpreting MIR
This closes#79601 by handling the case where memory allocation fails during MIR interpretation, and translates that failure into an `InterpError`. The error message is "tried to allocate more memory than available to compiler" to make it clear that the memory shortage is happening at compile-time by the compiler itself, and that it is not a runtime issue.
Now that memory allocation can fail, it would be neat if Miri could simulate low-memory devices to make it easy to see how much memory a Rust program needs.
Note that this breaks Miri because it assumes that allocation can never fail.
deny using default function in impl const Trait
Fixes#79450.
I don't know if my implementation is correct:
- The check is in `rustc_passes::check_const`, should I put it somewhere else instead?
- Is my approach (to checking the impl) optimal? It works for the current tests, but it might have some issues or there might be a better way of doing this.
Change vtable memory representation to use tcx allocated allocations.
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86324. However i suspect there's more to change before it can land.
r? `@bjorn3`
cc `@rust-lang/miri`
Use better error message for hard errors in CTFE
I noticed this while working on #86255: currently the same message is used for hard errors and soft errors in CTFE. This changes the error messages to make hard errors use a message that indicates the reality of the situation correctly, since usage of the constant is never allowed when there was a hard error evaluating it. This doesn't affect the behaviour of these error messages, only the content.
This changes the error logic to check if the error should be hard or soft where it is generated, instead of where it is emitted, to allow this distinction in error messages.
Currently the same message is used for hard errors and soft errors. This
makes hard errors use a message that indicates the reality of the
situation correctly, since usage of the constant is never allowed when
there was a hard error evaluating it.
Detect incorrect vtable alignment during const eval
This PR fixes#86132 by detecting invalid alignment values for trait objects in the interpreter, and emitting an error about this conversion failure, to avoid the ICE.
I've noticed that the error emitted at a50d72158e/compiler/rustc_mir/src/interpret/traits.rs (L163-L166) doesn't seem to be present in the const-ub tests, so I've tried adding a test that triggers both of these cases: one for the invalid size, and another for the invalid alignment that #86132 tracks (I have found different magic values triggering different `Align::from_bytes` errors than the "power of 2" one, if need be).
However, when doing that, I *cannot* for the life of me figure out the correct incantation to make these 2 errors trigger with the "it is undefined behavior to use this value" message rather than the "any use of this value will cause an error" lint.
I've tried Oli's suggestions of different values, tuples and arrays, using the transparent wrapper trick from the other tests and I was only able to trigger the regular const-ub errors about the size of the vtable, or that the drop pointer was invalid. Maybe these "type validation failed" errors happen before this part of the interpreter is reached and there just needs some magic incorrect values to bypass them, I don't know.
Since this fixes an ICE, and if the constants are indeed used, these 2 tests will turn into a hard error, I thought I'd open the PR anyways. And if ```@RalfJung``` you know of a way I could manage that (if you think that these tests are worth checking that the `throw_ub_format!` does indeed create const-ub errors as we expect) I'd be grateful.
For that reason, r? ```@RalfJung``` and cc ```@oli-obk.```
Make copy/copy_nonoverlapping fn's again
Make copy/copy_nonoverlapping fn's again, rather than intrinsics.
This a short-term change to address issue #84297.
It effectively reverts PRs #81167#81238 (and part of #82967), #83091, and parts of #79684.
