Suggest replacing braces for brackets on array-esque invalid block expr
Newcomers may write `{1, 2, 3}` for making arrays, and the current error message is not informative enough to quickly convince them what is needed to fix the error.
This PR implements a diagnostic for this case, and its output looks like this:
```text
error: this code is interpreted as a block expression, not an array
--> src/lib.rs:1:22
|
1 | const FOO: [u8; 3] = {
| ______________________^
2 | | 1, 2, 3
3 | | };
| |_^
|
= note: to define an array, one would use square brackets instead of curly braces
help: try using [] instead of {}
|
1 | const FOO: [u8; 3] = [
2 | 1, 2, 3
3 | ];
|
```
Fix#87672
Add initial support for m68k
This patch series adds initial support for m68k making use of the new M68k
backend introduced with LLVM-13. Additional changes will be needed to be
able to actually use the backend for this target.
Fix debuginfo tests for the latest version of the Windows SDK.
Re-enable the tests that were disabled to fix CI.
Changes:
- Cdb now correctly visualizes enums.
- Cdb doesn't render emoji characters in `OSStr` anymore.
- Cdb doesn't always render `str` correctly (#88840)
Add `ConstraintCategory::Usage` for handling aggregate construction
In some cases, we emit borrowcheck diagnostics pointing
at a particular field expression in a struct expression
(e.g. `MyStruct { field: my_expr }`). However, this
behavior currently relies on us choosing the
`ConstraintCategory::Boring` with the 'correct' span.
When adding additional variants to `ConstraintCategory`,
(or changing existing usages away from `ConstraintCategory::Boring`),
the current behavior can easily get broken, since a non-boring
constraint will get chosen over a boring one.
To make the diagnostic output less fragile, this commit
adds a `ConstraintCategory::Usage` variant. We use this variant
for the temporary assignments created for each field of
an aggregate we are constructing.
Using this new variant, we can emit a message mentioning
"this usage", emphasizing the fact that the error message
is related to the specific use site (in the struct expression).
This is preparation for additional work on improving NLL error messages
(see #57374)
Gather module items after lowering.
This avoids having a non-local analysis inside lowering.
By implementing `hir_module_items` using a visitor, we make sure that iterations and visitors are consistent.
Newcomers may write `{1, 2, 3}` for making arrays, and the current error
message is not informative enough to quickly convince them what is
needed to fix the error.
This PR implements a diagnostic for this case, and its output looks like
this:
```text
error: this code is interpreted as a block expression, not an array
--> src/lib.rs:1:22
|
1 | const FOO: [u8; 3] = {
| ______________________^
2 | | 1, 2, 3
3 | | };
| |_^
|
= note: to define an array, one would use square brackets instead of curly braces
help: try using [] instead of {}
|
1 | const FOO: [u8; 3] = [
2 | 1, 2, 3
3 | ];
|
```
Fix#87672
Suggest better place to add call parentheses for method expressions wrapped in parentheses
I wanted to improve the suggestion a bit to both remove the wrapping parentheses **and** add call parentheses by both calling `suggest_method_call` and using `multipart_suggestion`. But I very quickly ran into a problem where multiple overlapping machine applicable suggestions cannot be properly applied together. So I applied the suggestion from the issue and only added the call parentheses directly after the expression.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89044
Add a separate error for `dyn Trait` in `const fn`
Previously "trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable" error was used for both trait bounds (`<T: Trait>`) and trait objects (`dyn Trait`). This was pretty confusing.
This PR adds a separate error for trait objects: "trait objects in const fn are unstable". The error for trait bounds is otherwise intact.
This is follow up to #88907
r? ``@estebank``
``@rustbot`` label: +A-diagnostics
Fix linting when trailing macro expands to a trailing semi
When a macro is used in the trailing expression position of a block
(e.g. `fn foo() { my_macro!() }`), we currently parse it as an
expression, rather than a statement. As a result, we ended up
using the `NodeId` of the containing statement as our `lint_node_id`,
even though we don't normally do this for macro calls.
If such a macro expands to an expression with a `#[cfg]` attribute,
then the trailing statement can get removed entirely. This lead to
an ICE, since we were usng the `NodeId` of the expression to emit
a lint.
Ths commit makes us skip updating `lint_node_id` when handling
a macro in trailing expression position. This will cause us to
lint at the closest parent of the macro call.
Suggest replacing an inexisting field for an unmentioned field
Fix#87938
This PR adds a suggestion to replace an inexisting field for an
unmentioned field. Given the following code:
```rust
enum Foo {
Bar { alpha: u8, bravo: u8, charlie: u8 },
}
fn foo(foo: Foo) {
match foo {
Foo::Bar {
alpha,
beta, // `bravo` miswritten as `beta` here.
charlie,
} => todo!(),
}
}
```
the compiler now emits the error messages below.
```text
error[E0026]: variant `Foo::Bar` does not have a field named `beta`
--> src/lib.rs:9:13
|
9 | beta, // `bravo` miswritten as `beta` here.
| ^^^^
| |
| variant `Foo::Bar` does not have this field
| help: `Foo::Bar` has a field named `bravo`: `bravo`
```
Note that this suggestion is available iff the number of inexisting
fields and unmentioned fields are both 1.
Propagate coercion cause into `try_coerce`
Currently, `coerce_inner` discards its `ObligationCause`
when calling `try_coerce`. This interfers with other
diagnostc improvements I'm working on, since we will lose
the original span by the time the actual coercion occurs.
Additionally, we now use the span of the trailing expression
(rather than the span of the entire function) when performing
a coercion in `check_return_expr`. This currently has no visible
effect on any of the unit tests, but will unblock future
diagnostic improvements.
Start block is not allowed to have basic block predecessors
* The MIR validator is extended to detect potential violations.
* The start block has no predecessors after building MIR, so no changes are required there.
* The SimplifyCfg could previously violate this requirement when collapsing goto chains, so transformation is disabled for the start block, which also substantially simplifies the implementation.
* The LLVM function entry block also must not have basic block predecessors. Previously, to ensure that code generation had to perform necessary adjustments. This now became unnecessary.
The motivation behind the change is to align with analogous requirement in LLVM, and to avoid potential latent bugs like the one reported in #88043.
Simplify lazy DefPathHash decoding by using an on-disk hash table.
This PR simplifies the logic around mapping `DefPathHash` values encountered during incremental compilation to valid `DefId`s in the current session. It is able to do so by using an on-disk hash table encoding that allows for looking up values directly, i.e. without deserializing the entire table.
The main simplification comes from not having to keep track of `DefPathHashes` being used during the compilation session.
Skip single use lifetime lint for generated opaque types
Fix: #77175
The opaque type generated by the desugaring process of an async function uses the lifetimes defined by the originating function. The DefId for the lifetimes in the opaque type are different from the ones in the originating async function - as they should be, as far as I understand, and could therefore be considered a single use lifetimes, this causes the single_use_lifetimes lint to fail compilation if explicitly denied. This fix skips the lint for lifetimes used only once in generated opaque types for an async function that are declared in the parent async function definition.
More info in the comments on the original issue: 1 and 2
Add rustdoc version into the help popup
After a discussion with a rustdoc user about a specific behaviour, we realized we were not talking about the same version. To add on top of it, it was actually not that simple to find out the version since it was hosted documentation.
So to simplify things, I added the version into the help popup:
Does the version format looks or would you prefer that I add more information? We can also add the commit hash, commit date, host and release.
cc `@rust-lang/rustdoc`
r? `@jyn514`
Allow `panic!("{}", computed_str)` in const fn.
Special-case `panic!("{}", arg)` and translate it to `panic_display(&arg)`. `panic_display` will behave like `panic_any` in cosnt eval and behave like `panic!(format_args!("{}", arg))` in runtime.
This should bring Rust 2015 and 2021 to feature parity in terms of `const_panic`; and hopefully would unblock the stabilisation of #51999.
`@rustbot` modify labels: +T-compiler +T-libs +A-const-eval +A-const-fn
r? `@oli-obk`
Do not issue E0071 if a type error has already been reported
Fixes#88844. A suggested fix is already included in the error message for E0412, so with my changes, E0071 is simply not emitted anymore if the type in question is a "type error". This makes sense, I think, because we cannot confidently state that something is "not a struct" if we couldn't resolve it properly; and it's unnecessary to pollute the output with this additional error message, as it is a direct consequence of the former error.
I have also addressed the issue mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88844#issuecomment-917324856 by changing the fixed example in the documentation to more closely match the erroneous code example.
Improve build command for compiler docs
It was rather complicated to document rustc crates. With this, you can directly run:
```console
x.py doc compiler
x.py doc compiler/rustc_hir_pretty
```
The second commit adds the handling of the `--open` flag.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Point to closure when emitting 'cannot move out' for captured variable
Attempts to fix#87456. The error message now points to the capturing closure, but I was not able to explain _why_ the closure implements `Fn` or `FnMut` (`TypeckResults::closure_kind_origins` did not contain anything for the closure in question).
cc `@Aaron1011`
Set the library path in sysroot-crates-are-unstable
Most of the `run-make-fulldeps` tests use a make-driven rustc command
that includes `HOST_RPATH_DIR` in the library path, but this particular
test runs from python instead. When the toolchain is built without
`rpath` enabled, we need that library path in the environment so it can
find its own libraries.
Improve error message for type mismatch in generator arguments
Fixes#88653. The code example given there is invalid because the `Generator` trait (unlike the `Fn` traits) does not take the generator arguments in tupled-up form (because there can only be one argument, from my understanding). Hence, the type error in the example in #88653 is correct, because the given generator takes a `bool` argument, whereas the function's return type talks about a generator with a `(bool,)` argument.
The error message is both confusing and wrong, though: It is wrong because it displays the wrong "expected signature", and it is confusing because both the "expected" and "found" notes point at the same span. With my changes, I get the following, more helpful output:
```
error[E0631]: type mismatch in generator arguments
--> test.rs:5:22
|
5 | fn foo(bar: bool) -> impl Generator<(bool,)> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected signature of `fn((bool,)) -> _`
6 | |bar| {
| ----- found signature of `fn(bool) -> _`
```
Don't lint about missing code examples in derived traits
When the `missing_doc_code_examples` lint is performed it also requires that derived Trait implementations have a code example for each member etc., which causes undesirable behavior.
# Examples
With `missing_doc_code_examples` enable we are not able to use the `Clone` derive macro due to the generated code not being documented:
```rust
#[deny(rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples)]
/// docs
/// ```
/// let s = SomeStruct;
/// ```
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct SomeStruct;
```
yields:
```
Documenting testt v0.1.0 (<redacted>)
error: missing code example in this documentation
--> src/lib.rs:7:10
|
7 | #[derive(Clone)]
| ^^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> src/lib.rs:1:8
|
1 | #[deny(rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: missing code example in this documentation
--> src/lib.rs:7:10
|
7 | #[derive(Clone)]
| ^^^^^
error: could not document `testt`
Caused by:
process didn't exit successfully: `rustdoc ...
```
closes#81775
Fix ICE in `improper_ctypes_definitions` lint with all-ZST transparent types
Fixes#87496. There is also another function in the same file that looks fishy, but I haven't been able to produce an ICE there, and in any case, it's not related to #87496:
fd853c00e2/compiler/rustc_lint/src/types.rs (L720-L734)
r? ```@JohnTitor```
Most of the `run-make-fulldeps` tests use a make-driven rustc command
that includes `HOST_RPATH_DIR` in the library path, but this particular
test runs from python instead. When the toolchain is built without
`rpath` enabled, we need that library path in the environment so it can
find its own libraries.
