Add a proc-macro to derive HashStable in librustc dependencies
A second proc-macro is added to derive HashStable for crates librustc depends on.
This proc-macro HashStable_Generic (to bikeshed) allows to decouple code and some librustc's boilerplate.
Not everything is migrated, because `Span` and `TokenKind` require to be placed inside librustc.
Types using them stay there too.
Split out of #66279
r? @Zoxc
Move process_configure_mod to rustc_parse
This removes the hack in favor of perhaps a less principled, but less painful, approach.
This also supports my work to decouple `Session` from librustc, as `ParseSess` currently has `Attribute` as "part" of it but after this PR will no longer do so.
Making ICEs and test them in incremental
This adds:
- A way to make the compiler ICE
- A way to check for ICE in `cfail` tests with `should-ice`
- A regression test for issue #65401
I am not sure the attribute added `should-ice` is the best for this job
Suggest `#[repr(C)]` instead of `#[repr(C, packed, ...)]`
The code was previously suggesting `#[repr(C, packed, ...)]` for incorrect uses of `repr` (e.g. `#[repr = "C"]`). This change suggests the usage of `#[repr(C)]` instead.
r? @estebank
Ref: #61286.
Move the JSON error emitter to librustc_errors
This is done both as a cleanup (it makes little sense for this emitter to be in libsyntax), but also as part of broader work to decouple Session from librustc itself.
Along the way, this also moves SourceMap to syntax_pos, which is also nice for the above reasons, as well as allowing dropping the SourceMapper trait from code. This had the unfortunate side-effect of moving `FatalError` to rustc_data_structures (it's needed in syntax_pos, due to SourceMap, but putting it there feels somehow worse).
SourceMap is now in the root of all rustc-specific crates, syntax_pos,
so there's no need for the trait object to decouple the dependencies
between librustc_errors and libsyntax as was needed previously.
Push `ast::{ItemKind, ImplItemKind}::OpaqueTy` hack down into lowering
We currently have a hack in the form of `ast::{ItemKind, ImplItemKind}::OpaqueTy` which is constructed literally when you write `type Alias = impl Trait;` but not e.g. `type Alias = Vec<impl Trait>;`. Per https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2515, this needs to change to allow `impl Trait` in nested positions. This PR achieves this change for the syntactic aspect but not the semantic one, which will require changes in lowering and def collection. In the interim, `TyKind::opaque_top_hack` is introduced to avoid knock-on changes in lowering, collection, and resolve. These hacks can then be removed and fixed one by one until the desired semantics are supported.
r? @varkor
This does not update the use sites or delete the now unnecessary
SourceMapper trait, to allow git to interpret the file move as a rename
rather than a new file.
support issue = "none" in unstable attributes
This works towards fixing #41260.
This PR allows the use of `issue = "none"` in unstable attributes and makes changes to internally store the issue number as an `Option<NonZeroU32>`. For example:
```rust
#[unstable(feature = "unstable_test_feature", issue = "none")]
fn unstable_issue_none() {}
```
It was not made optional because feedback seen here #60860 suggested that people might forget the issue field if it was optional.
I could not remove the current uses of `issue = "0"` (of which there are a lot) because the stage 0 compiler expects the old syntax. Once this is available in the stage 0 compiler we can replace all uses of `"0"` with `"none"` and no longer allow `"0"`. This is my first time contributing, so I'm not sure what the protocol is with two-part things like this, so some guidance would be appreciated.
r? @varkor
Merge repeated definitions
Step forward on #66149
I may need further context to understand the need for a separate crate.
Also, please tell me if you think of other definitions to merge.
Support registering inert attributes and attribute tools using crate-level attributes
And remove `#[feature(custom_attribute)]`.
(`rustc_plugin::Registry::register_attribute` is not removed yet, I'll do it in a follow up PR.)
```rust
#![register_attr(my_attr)]
#![register_tool(my_tool)]
#[my_attr] // OK
#[my_tool::anything] // OK
fn main() {}
```
---
Some tools (`rustfmt` and `clippy`) used in tool attributes are hardcoded in the compiler.
We need some way to introduce them without hardcoding as well.
This PR introduces a way to do it with a crate level attribute.
The previous attempt to introduce them through command line (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57921) met some resistance.
This probably needs to go through an RFC before stabilization.
However, I'd prefer to land *this* PR without an RFC to able to remove `#[feature(custom_attribute)]` and `Registry::register_attribute` while also providing a replacement.
---
`register_attr` is a direct replacement for `#![feature(custom_attribute)]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29642), except it doesn't rely on implicit fallback from unresolved attributes to custom attributes (which was always hacky and is the primary reason for the removal of `custom_attribute`) and requires registering the attribute explicitly.
It's not clear whether it should go through stabilization or not.
It's quite possible that all the uses should migrate to `#![register_tool]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66079) instead.
---
Details:
- The naming is `register_attr`/`register_tool` rather than some `register_attributes` (plural, no abbreviation) for consistency with already existing attributes like `cfg_attr`, or `feature`, etc.
---
Previous attempt: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57921
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44690
Tracking issues: #66079 (`register_tool`), #66080 (`register_attr`)
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29642
Split libsyntax apart
In this PR the general idea is to separate the AST, parser, and friends by a more data / logic structure (tho not fully realized!) by separating out the parser and macro expansion code from libsyntax. Specifically have now three crates instead of one (libsyntax):
- libsyntax:
- concrete syntax tree (`syntax::ast`)
- definition of tokens and token-streams (`syntax::{token, tokenstream}`) -- used by `syntax::ast`
- visitors (`syntax::visit`, `syntax::mut_visit`)
- shared definitions between `libsyntax_expand`
- feature gating (`syntax::feature_gate`) -- we could possibly move this out to its own crater later.
- attribute and meta item utilities, including used-marking (`syntax::attr`)
- pretty printer (`syntax::print`) -- this should possibly be moved out later. For now I've reduced down the dependencies to a single essential one which could be broken via `ParseSess`. This entails that e.g. `Debug` impls for `Path` cannot reference the pretty printer.
- definition of `ParseSess` (`syntax::sess`) -- this is used by `syntax::{attr, print, feature_gate}` and is a common definition used by the parser and other things like librustc.
- the `syntax::source_map` -- this includes definitions used by `syntax::ast` and other things but could ostensibly be moved `syntax_pos` since that is more related to this module.
- a smattering of misc utilities not sufficiently important to itemize -- some of these could be moved to where they are used (often a single place) but I wanted to limit the scope of this PR.
- librustc_parse:
- parser (`rustc_parse::parser`) -- reading a file and such are defined in the crate root tho.
- lexer (`rustc_parse::lexer`)
- validation of meta grammar (post-expansion) in (`rustc_parse::validate_attr`)
- libsyntax_expand -- this defines the infra for macro expansion and conditional compilation but this is not libsyntax_ext; we might want to merge them later but currently libsyntax_expand is depended on by librustc_metadata which libsyntax_ext is not.
- conditional compilation (`syntax_expand::config`) -- moved from `syntax::config` to here
- the bulk of this crate is made up of the old `syntax::ext`
r? @estebank
`MethodSig` -> `FnSig` & Use it in `ItemKind::Fn`
In both AST & HIR, rename `MethodSig` to `FnSig` and then proceed to use it in `ItemKind::Fn` so that the overall structure is more regular.
r? @davidtwco
