Port #[no_link] to use attribute parser
Adds `#[no_link]` to the attribute parser, as well as adds tests making sure to FCW warn on `field`, `arm`, and `macrodef `
Use annotate-snippet as default emitter on stable
This is implementation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/149932
Now, after MCP was accepted, we can use annotate-snippet as default emitter for errors, that means that we not longer need of previous emitter, so this PR removed previous emitter and makes annotate-snippet new default one both on stable and nightly
(this PR does not remove a code of previous emitter it just removes a `Default` option of `HumanReadableErrorType` enum, and keeping only `HumanReadableErrorType::AnnotateSnippet` as it now uses by default)
Warn on codegen attributes on required trait methods
This PR turns applying the following attributes on required trait methods (that is, trait methods **without** a default implementation) into a FCW:
- `#[cold]`
- `#[link_section]`
- `#[linkage]` (unstable)
- `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` (internal attribute)
These attributes already had no effect when applied to a required trait method, this PR only adds a warning.
Furthermore, it adds a comment in the code that the following codegen attributes are *inherited* when applied to a required trait method:
- `#[track_caller]`
- `#[align]` (unstable)
````@rustbot```` labels +I-lang-nominated
````@rust-lang/lang````
Two questions for the lang team:
- Is adding this warning ok?
- Does the current behaviour of these attributes align with that you would expect them to be?
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147432
If there are too many suggestions for malformed attribute, do not suggest them
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/149865.
This not only covers for doc attributes but for all attributes, so don't hesitate to tell me if you want it to be limited to only doc attributes (although I think it's actually a nice improvement overall).
Also, I picked 3 as the maximum number of suggestions before it becomes noise, but it's very much open to debate.
r? `@JonathanBrouwer`
Port `doc` attributes to new attribute API
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229.
This PR ports the `doc` attributes to the new attribute API. However, there are things that will need to be fixed in a follow-up:
* Some part of `cfg_old.rs` are likely unused now, so they should be removed.
* Not all error/lints are emitted at the same time anymore, making them kinda less useful considering that you need to run and fix rustc/rustdoc multiple times to get through all of them.
* For coherency with the other attribute errors, I didn't modify the default output too much, meaning that we have some new messages now. I'll likely come back to that to check if the previous ones were better in a case-by-case approach.
* `doc(test(attr(...)))` is handled in a horrifying manner currently. Until we can handle it correctly with the `Attribute` system, it'll remain that thing we're all very ashamed of. 😈
* A type in rustdoc got its size increased, I'll check the impact on performance. But in any case, I plan to improve it in a follow-up so should be "ok".
* Because of error reporting, some fields of `Doc` are suboptimal, like `inline` which instead of being an `Option` is a `ThinVec` because we report the error later on. Part of the things I'm not super happy about but can be postponed to future me.
* In `src/librustdoc/clean/cfg.rs`, the `pub(crate) fn parse(cfg: &MetaItemInner) -> Result<Cfg, InvalidCfgError> {` function should be removed once `cfg_trace` has been ported to new `cfg` API.
* Size of type `DocFragment` went from 32 to 48. Would be nice to get it back to 32.
* ``malformed `doc` attribute input`` wasn't meant for so many candidates, should be improved.
* See how many of the checks in `check_attr` we can move to attribute parsing
* Port target checking to be in the attribute parser completely
* Fix target checking for `doc(alias)` on fields & patterns
And finally, once this PR is merged, I plan to finally stabilize `doc_cfg` feature. :)
cc `@jdonszelmann`
r? `@JonathanBrouwer`
Move attribute safety checking to attribute parsing
This PR moves attribute safety checking to be done during attribute parsing. The `cfg` and `cfg_attr` attribute no longer need special-cased safety checking, yay!
This PR is a part 1 of 2, in the second part I'd like to define attribute safety in the attribute parsers rather than getting the information from BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTE_MAP, but to keep PRs reviewable lets do that separately.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/148453 by reordering the diagnostics. The "cannot find attribute" diagnostic now appears first, but both diagnostics still appear.
r? `@jdonszelmann`
Gate tests with the right edition
This PR guarantees that `./x test --test-args="--edition XXXX" ui` runs correctly with the 2015, 2018 and 2021 editions.
I don't expect this PR to hold up over time but it helps to submit further updates to the `//@ edition` directives of tests where we can use the new range syntax to have a more robust testing across different editions
r? `@fmease`
---
try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: i686-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: test-various
try-job: armhf-gnu
Check unsafety for non-macro attributes in `validate_attr`
r? `````@jdonszelmann`````
Also adds a test for a previously untested case, unnecessary unsafe on a proc macro attribute
In preparation for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/148453
Warn on unused_attributes in uitests
r? ```@jdonszelmann```
Because:
- unused_attributes warnings are usually actual mistakes, rather than just unused code, and we want to notify test writers they may be accidentally making a mistake
- Because the lint was allowed by default previously, we missed real bugs, because the test coverage is worse
1. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147417
2. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147411
Rehome 26 `tests/ui/issues/` tests to other subdirectories under `tests/ui/` [#5 of Batch #2]
Part of rust-lang/rust#133895
Methodology:
1. Refer to the previously written `tests/ui/SUMMARY.md`
2. Find an appropriate category for the test, using the original issue thread and the test contents.
3. Add the issue URL at the bottom (not at the top, as that would mess up stderr line numbers)
4. Rename the tests to make their purpose clearer
Inspired by the methodology that Kivooeo was using.
r? ```@jieyouxu```
mbe: Implement `unsafe` attribute rules
This implements `unsafe attr` rules for declarative `macro_rules!` attributes, as specified in [RFC 3697](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3697).
An invocation of an attribute that uses an `unsafe attr` rule requires the `unsafe(attr(...))` syntax.
An invocation of an attribute that uses an ordinary `attr` rule must *not* use the `unsafe(attr(...))` syntax.
`unsafe` is only supported on an `attr` rule, not any other kind of `macro_rules!` rule.
Tracking issue for `macro_rules!` attributes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143547
