These methods are all covered by [RFC 1158] and are currently all available on
stable Rust via the [`net2` crate][net2] on crates.io. This commit does not
touch the timeout related functions as they're still waiting on `Duration` which
is unstable anyway, so punting in favor of the `net2` crate wouldn't buy much.
[RFC 1158]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1158
[net2]: http://crates.io/crates/net2
Specifically, this commit deprecates:
* TcpStream::set_nodelay
* TcpStream::set_keepalive
* UdpSocket::set_broadcast
* UdpSocket::set_multicast_loop
* UdpSocket::join_multicast
* UdpSocket::set_multicast_time_to_live
* UdpSocket::set_time_to_live
I had to modify some tests : since `wtf8buf_show` and `wtf8_show` were doing the exact same thing, I repurposed `wtf8_show` to `wtf8buf_show_str` which ensures `Wtf8Buf` `Debug`-formats the same as `str`.
`write_str_escaped` might also be shared amongst other `fmt` but I just left it there within `Wtf8::fmt` for review.
The first paragraph of the docs of the Cursor struct contains a Markdown
link. In listings, this won't get rendered. (Rustdoc seems to split off the
first paragraph and after that convert Markdown to HTML.)
Many of these have long since reached their stage of being obsolete, so this
commit starts the removal process for all of them. The unstable features that
were deprecated are:
* box_heap
* cmp_partial
* fs_time
* hash_default
* int_slice
* iter_min_max
* iter_reset_fuse
* iter_to_vec
* map_in_place
* move_from
* owned_ascii_ext
* page_size
* read_and_zero
* scan_state
* slice_chars
* slice_position_elem
* subslice_offset
Many of these have long since reached their stage of being obsolete, so this
commit starts the removal process for all of them. The unstable features that
were deprecated are:
* cmp_partial
* fs_time
* hash_default
* int_slice
* iter_min_max
* iter_reset_fuse
* iter_to_vec
* map_in_place
* move_from
* owned_ascii_ext
* page_size
* read_and_zero
* scan_state
* slice_chars
* slice_position_elem
* subslice_offset
These aren't really used for anything any more, so there doesn't seem to be much
reason to leave them around in the `rt` directory. There was some limiting of
threads spawned or tests when run under valgrind, but very little is run under
valgrind nowadays so there's also no real use keeping these around.
It's deprecated and unsafe, so we shouldn't be encouraging people to use
it. Move it to `std:🧵:scoped` instead, since it's still useful
information to anyone who is using the API.
It's deprecated and unsafe, so we shouldn't be encouraging people to use
it. Move it to `std:🧵:scoped` instead, since it's still useful
information to anyone who is using the API.
Macro desugaring of `in PLACE { BLOCK }` into "simpler" expressions following the in-development "Placer" protocol.
Includes Placer API that one can override to integrate support for `in` into one's own type. (See [RFC 809].)
[RFC 809]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0809-box-and-in-for-stdlib.md
Part of #22181
Replaced PR #26180.
Turns on the `in PLACE { BLOCK }` syntax, while leaving in support for the old `box (PLACE) EXPR` syntax (since we need to support that at least until we have a snapshot with support for `in PLACE { BLOCK }`.
(Note that we are not 100% committed to the `in PLACE { BLOCK }` syntax. In particular I still want to play around with some other alternatives. Still, I want to get the fundamental framework for the protocol landed so we can play with implementing it for non `Box` types.)
----
Also, this PR leaves out support for desugaring-based `box EXPR`. We will hopefully land that in the future, but for the short term there are type-inference issues injected by that change that we want to resolve separately.
Makes the lint a bit more accurate, and improves the quality of the diagnostic
messages by explicitly returning an error message.
The new lint is also a little more aggressive: specifically, it now
rejects tuples, and it recurses into function pointers.
These provide various special readers, so point their docs to their
constructor functions in a manner consistent with everything else.
r? @alexcrichton
Mostly through adding examples.
r? @alexcrichton
I'm going to be doing a bunch of these today, but I figured I'd keep it one PR per struct, since the last 'all the things in one PR' ended up taking a week to actually land.
This commit moves the IR files in the distribution, rust_try.ll,
rust_try_msvc_64.ll, and rust_try_msvc_32.ll into the compiler from the main
distribution. There's a few reasons for this change:
* LLVM changes its IR syntax from time to time, so it's very difficult to
have these files build across many LLVM versions simultaneously. We'll likely
want to retain this ability for quite some time into the future.
* The implementation of these files is closely tied to the compiler and runtime
itself, so it makes sense to fold it into a location which can do more
platform-specific checks for various implementation details (such as MSVC 32
vs 64-bit).
* This removes LLVM as a build-time dependency of the standard library. This may
end up becoming very useful if we move towards building the standard library
with Cargo.
In the immediate future, however, this commit should restore compatibility with
LLVM 3.5 and 3.6.
This commit moves the IR files in the distribution, rust_try.ll,
rust_try_msvc_64.ll, and rust_try_msvc_32.ll into the compiler from the main
distribution. There's a few reasons for this change:
* LLVM changes its IR syntax from time to time, so it's very difficult to
have these files build across many LLVM versions simultaneously. We'll likely
want to retain this ability for quite some time into the future.
* The implementation of these files is closely tied to the compiler and runtime
itself, so it makes sense to fold it into a location which can do more
platform-specific checks for various implementation details (such as MSVC 32
vs 64-bit).
* This removes LLVM as a build-time dependency of the standard library. This may
end up becoming very useful if we move towards building the standard library
with Cargo.
In the immediate future, however, this commit should restore compatibility with
LLVM 3.5 and 3.6.
This can fail on linux for various reasons, such as the /proc filesystem not
being mounted. There are already many cases where we can't set up stack guards,
so just don't worry about this case and communicate that no guard was enabled.
I've confirmed that this allows the compiler to run in a chroot without /proc
mounted.
Closes#22642
Fixes#26475
I'm not sure this is enough, really, but I'm not totally clear on what specific information would be valuable here. In the original issue, the Java page was pretty decent, but now I can't think of a different way to word it, and copying their prose is of course not acceptable.
thoughts @alexcrichton @aturon @aidanhs ?
