This PR disallows non-inline modules without path annotations that are either in a block or in an inline module whose containing file is not a directory owner (fixes#29765).
This is a [breaking-change].
r? @nikomatsakis
This PR fixes two unrelated diagnostics bugs in resolve.
First, it reports privacy errors for an import only after the import resolution is determined, fixing #31402.
Second, it expands the per-module map from block ids to anonymous modules so that it also maps module declarations ids to modules, and it uses this map to in `with_scope` to fix#31644.
r? @nrc
This PR adds to `NameBinding` so it can more fully represent bindings from imports as well from items, refactors away `Target`, generalizes `ImportResolution` to a simpler type `NameResolution`, and uses a single `NameResolution`-valued map in place the existing maps `children` and `import_resolutions` (of `NameBinding`s and `ImportResolution`s, respectively), simplifying duplicate checking and name resolution.
It also unifies the `resolve_name_in_module` in `lib.rs` with its namesake in `resolve_imports.rs`, clarifying and improving the core logic (fixes#31403 and fixes#31404) while maintaining clear future-comparability with shadowable globs (i.e., never reporting that a resolution is a `Success` or is `Failing` unless this would also be knowable with shadowable globs).
Since it fixes#31403, this is technically a [breaking-change], but it is exceedingly unlikely to cause breakage in practice. The following is an example of code that would break:
```rust
mod foo {
pub mod bar {} // This defines bar in the type namespace
pub use alpha::bar; // This defines bar in the value namespace
// This should define baz in both namespaces, but it only defines baz in the type namespace.
pub use self::bar as baz;
pub fn baz() {} // This should collide with baz, but now it does not.
}
pub fn f() {}
mod alpha {
pub use self::f as bar; // Changing this to `pub fn bar() {}` causes the collision right now.
pub use super::*;
}
```
r? @nrc
A spec like `#[cfg(foo(bar))]` is not allowed as an attribute. This
makes the same spec be rejected by the compiler if passed in as a
`--cfg` argument.
Fixes#31495
A spec like `#[cfg(foo(bar))]` is not allowed as an attribute. This
makes the same spec be rejected by the compiler if passed in as a
`--cfg` argument.
Fixes#31495
Refactor away resolve_name_in_module in resolve_imports.rs
Rewrite and improve the core name resolution procedure in NameResolution::result and Module::resolve_name
Refactor the duplicate checking code into NameResolution::try_define
Issue #31109 uncovered two semi-related problems:
* A panic in `str::parse::<f64>`
* A panic in `rustc::middle::const_eval::lit_to_const` where the result of float parsing was unwrapped.
This series of commits fixes both issues and also drive-by-fixes some things I noticed while tracking down the parsing panic.
This PR refactors away `Module`'s `external_module_children` and instead puts `extern crate` declarations in `children` like other items, simplifying duplicate checking and name resolution.
This PR also allows values to share a name with extern crates, which are only defined in the type namespace. Other than that, it is a pure refactoring.
r? @nrc
This fixes an ICE introduced by #31065 that occurs when a path cannot be resolved because of a certain class of unresolved import (`Indeterminate` imports).
For example, this currently causes an ICE:
```rust
mod foo { pub use self::*; }
fn main() { foo::f() }
```
r? @nrc
We no longer require `use` and `extern crate` items to precede other items in modules thanks to [RFC #385](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/385), but we still require `use` and `extern crate` items to precede statements in blocks (other items can appear anywhere in a block).
I think that this is a needless distinction between imports and other items that contradicts the intent of the RFC.
This is a work in progress PR that potentially should fix#29084, #28308, #25385, #28288, #31011. I think this may also adresse parts of #2887.
The problem in this issues seems to be that when transcribing macro arguments, we just clone the argument Nonterminal, which still has to original spans. This leads to the unprintable spans. One solution would be to update the spans of the inserted argument to match the argument in the macro definition. So for [this testcase](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...fhahn:macro-ice?expand=1#diff-f7def7420c51621640707b6337726876R2) the error message would be displayed in the macro definition:
src/test/compile-fail/issue-31011.rs:4:12: 4:22 error: attempted access of field `trace` on type `&T`, but no field with that name was found
src/test/compile-fail/issue-31011.rs:4 if $ctx.trace {
Currently I've added a very simple `update_span` function, which updates the span of the outer-most expression of a `NtExpr`, but this `update_span` function should be updated to handle all Nonterminals. But I'm pretty new to the macro system and would like to check if this approach makes sense, before doing that.
This PR adds some minor error correction to the parser - if there is a missing ident, we recover and carry on. It also makes compilation more robust so that non-fatal errors (which is still most of them, unfortunately) in parsing do not cause us to abort compilation. The effect is that a program with a missing or incorrect ident can get all the way to type checking.
