Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #138364 (ports the compiler test cases to new rust_intrinsic format)
- #138570 (add `naked_functions_target_feature` unstable feature)
- #138623 ([bootstrap] Use llvm_runtimes for compiler-rt)
- #138627 (Autodiff cleanups)
- #138669 (tests: accept some noise from LLVM 21 in symbols-all-mangled)
- #138706 (Improve bootstrap git modified path handling)
- #138709 (Update GCC submodule)
- #138717 (Add an attribute that makes the spans from a macro edition 2021, and fix pin on edition 2024 with it)
- #138721 (Use explicit cpu in some asm and codegen tests.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
[bootstrap] Use llvm_runtimes for compiler-rt
Trying to enable `compiler-rt` via `LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS` is no longer a supported option in LLVM, and gives you nasty warnings:
```
Using LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=compiler-rt is deprecated now, and will become a
fatal error in the LLVM 21 release. Please use
-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=compiler-rt or see the instructions at
https://compiler-rt.llvm.org/ for building the runtimes.
```
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
try-job: x86_64-gnu-debug
bootstrap: add `--ci` flag
To make bootstrap act like it's running on CI, we had to override the `GITHUB_ACTIONS` environment variable which is a hidden detail of `CiEnv::is_ci`. Now, we can use the `--ci` flag directly on bootstrap which will be documented automatically from `x --help`. This also helps us to avoid race conditions on bootstrap (overriding `GITHUB_ACTIONS` env in each test can cause that if we run the tests in parallel) tests.
It's very useful. There are some false positives involving integration
tests in `rustc_pattern_analysis` and `rustc_serialize`. There is also a
false positive involving `rustc_driver_impl`'s
`rustc_randomized_layouts` feature. And I removed a `rustc_span` mention
in a doc comment in `rustc_log` because it wasn't integral to the
comment but caused a dev-dependency.
Leave a breadcrumb towards bootstrap config documentation in `bootstrap.toml`
I was curious as to the possible bootstrap options I can put in config.toml, but had some trouble figuring it out. There is no obvious documentation in `config.toml` (obviously), the documentation in src/bootstrap/defaults is *nice*, but also rather sparse, by design.
I had to dive into the parsing code, and stuble upon [a very helpful doc comment](30f168ef81/src/bootstrap/src/core/config/config.rs (L181)) there to realize that `config.example.toml` *exists*, and that it does, indeed, answer all of my questions.
So I figured it might be worth making this journey a bit easier for future contributors and add mention the `config.example.toml` directly in `config.toml`.
Now, since #137081 is in-flight which would rename `config(.example)?.toml` to `bootstrap(.example)?.toml`, I figure it's better to wait until that one lands, and submit the "new", "correct" filename upfront, instead of landing `config.toml` now and updating it to `boostrap.toml` later.
`@rustbot` blocked #137081
change config.toml to bootstrap.toml
Currently, both Bootstrap and Cargo uses same name as their configuration file, which can be confusing. This PR is based on a discussion to rename `config.toml` to `bootstrap.toml` for Bootstrap. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126875.
I have split the PR into atomic commits to make it easier to review. Once the changes are finalized, I will squash them. I am particularly concerned about the changes made to modules that are not part of Bootstrap. How should we handle those changes? Should we ping the respective maintainers?
Install licenses into `share/doc/rust/licenses`
This changes the path from "licences" to "licenses" for consistency
across the repo, including the usage directly around this line. This is
a US/UK spelling difference, but I believe the US spelling is also more
common in open source in general.
Update sccache to 0.10.0
This time, does it also for Windows and macOS. This unifies the sccache version across all OSes that we use.
r? `@ghost`
try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-x86_64-apple
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc-alt
try-job: dist-i686-msvc
try-job: dist-aarch64-msvc
try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
try-job: dist-x86_64-netbsd
use `expect` instead of `allow`
This is more useful than `allow` as compiler will force us to remove rules that are no longer valid (we already got a few of them in this change).
This is more useful than `allow` as compiler will force us to remove rules
that are no longer valid (we already got 2 of them in this change).
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
This changes the path from "licences" to "licenses" for consistency
across the repo, including the usage directly around this line. This is
a US/UK spelling difference, but I believe the US spelling is also more
common in open source in general.
