Emit StorageDead along unwind paths for generators
Completion of the work done in #60840. That PR made a change to implicitly consider a local `StorageDead` after Drop, but that was incorrect for DropAndReplace (see also #61060 which tried to fix this in a different way).
This finally enables the optimization implemented in #60187.
r? @eddyb
cc @Zoxc @cramertj @RalfJung
Implementation of RFC 2289 (associated_type_bounds)
This PR implements the [`asociated_type_bounds` feature](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2289-associated-type-bounds.md).
Associated type bounds are implemented in:
- function/method arguments and return types
- structs, enums, unions
- associated items in traits
- type aliases
- type parameter defaults
- trait objects
- let bindings
CC @nikomatsakis @centril
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #61503 (Fix cfg(test) build for x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx)
- #61534 (Edit docs of ExitStatus)
- #61536 (Don't allow using const fn arguments as "args_required_const")
- #61538 (Don't use GNU noexec stack note)
- #61546 (azure: Fix some minor issues which have broken our configuration )
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Add "type_name" support in emulate_intrinsic()
I did some dumb Git things and deleted my original fork repo semi-accidentally (but probably for the best as I'd messed up the history.)
This is the same issue as #61399, which was obviously auto-closed, to be clear.
std: Update dependency on `backtrace`
Discovered in #61416 an accidental regression in libstd's backtrace
behavior is that it previously attempted to consult libbacktrace and
would then fall back to `dladdr` if libbacktrace didn't report anything.
The `backtrace` crate, however, did not do this, so that's now been
fixed!
Changes: https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/compare/0.3.25...0.3.29Closes#61416
Discovered in #61416 an accidental regression in libstd's backtrace
behavior is that it previously attempted to consult libbacktrace and
would then fall back to `dladdr` if libbacktrace didn't report anything.
The `backtrace` crate, however, did not do this, so that's now been
fixed!
Changes: https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/compare/0.3.25...0.3.27Closes#61416
