Move binder for dyn to each list item
This essentially changes `ty::Binder<&'tcx List<ExistentialTraitRef>>` to `&'tcx List<ty::Binder<ExistentialTraitRef>>`.
This is a first step in moving the `dyn Trait` representation closer to Chalk, which we've talked about in `@rust-lang/wg-traits.`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Implement if-let match guards
Implements rust-lang/rfcs#2294 (tracking issue: #51114).
I probably should do a few more things before this can be merged:
- [x] Add tests (added basic tests, more advanced tests could be done in the future?)
- [x] Add lint for exhaustive if-let guard (comparable to normal if-let statements)
- [x] Fix clippy
However since this is a nightly feature maybe it's fine to land this and do those steps in follow-up PRs.
Thanks a lot `@matthewjasper` ❤️ for helping me with lowering to MIR! Would you be interested in reviewing this?
r? `@ghost` for now
This commit adds a Split DWARF compare mode to compiletest so that
debuginfo tests are also tested using Split DWARF in split mode (and
manually in single mode).
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
make MIR graphviz generation use gsgdt
gsgdt [https://crates.io/crates/gsgdt] is a crate which provides an
interface for stringly typed graphs. It also provides generation of
graphviz dot format from said graph.
This is the first in a series of PRs on moving graphviz code out of rustc into normal crates and then implementating graph diffing on top of these crates.
r? `@oli-obk`
Fixes reported bugs in Rust Coverage
Fixes: #79569Fixes: #79566Fixes: #79565
For the first issue (#79569), I got hit a `debug_assert!()` before
encountering the reported error message (because I have `debug = true`
enabled in my config.toml).
The assertion showed me that some `SwitchInt`s can have more than one
target pointing to the same `BasicBlock`.
I had thought that was invalid, but since it seems to be possible, I'm
allowing this now.
I added a new test for this.
----
In the last two cases above, both tests (intentionally) fail to compile,
but the `InstrumentCoverage` pass is invoked anyway.
The MIR starts with an `Unreachable` `BasicBlock`, which I hadn't
encountered before. (I had assumed the `InstrumentCoverage` pass
would only be invoked with MIRs from successful compilations.)
I don't have test infrastructure set up to test coverage on files that
fail to compile, so I didn't add a new test.
r? `@tmandry`
FYI: `@wesleywiser`
Adds checks for:
* `no_core` attribute
* explicitly-enabled `legacy` symbol mangling
* mir_opt_level > 1 (which enables inlining)
I removed code from the `Inline` MIR pass that forcibly disabled
inlining if `-Zinstrument-coverage` was set. The default `mir_opt_level`
does not enable inlining anyway. But if the level is explicitly set and
is greater than 1, I issue a warning.
The new warnings show up in tests, which is much better for diagnosing
potential option conflicts in these cases.
Apply `doc(cfg)` from parent items while collecting trait impls
Because trait impls bypass the standard `clean` hierarchy they do not participate in the `propagate_doc_cfg` pass, so instead we need to pre-collect all possible `doc(cfg)` attributes that will apply to them when cleaning.
fixes#79201
Dogfood `str_split_once()`
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74773.
Beyond increased clarity, this fixes some instances of a common confusion with how `splitn(2)` behaves: the first element will always be `Some()`, regardless of the delimiter, and even if the value is empty.
Given this code:
```rust
fn main() {
let val = "...";
let mut iter = val.splitn(2, '=');
println!("Input: {:?}, first: {:?}, second: {:?}", val, iter.next(), iter.next());
}
```
We get:
```
Input: "no_delimiter", first: Some("no_delimiter"), second: None
Input: "k=v", first: Some("k"), second: Some("v")
Input: "=", first: Some(""), second: Some("")
```
Using `str_split_once()` makes more clear what happens when the delimiter is not found.
Update RLS and Rustfmt
Fixes#79406Fixes#79407
This does pull 1.4.28 version of Rustfmt. Do you want me to pull the 1.4.29 while we're at it?
r? `@calebcartwright`
Update cargo
12 commits in bfca1cd22bf514d5f2b6c1089b0ded0ba7dfaa6e..63d0fe43449adcb316d34d98a982b597faca4178
2020-11-24 16:33:21 +0000 to 2020-12-02 01:44:30 +0000
- Add "--workspace" to update command (rust-lang/cargo#8725)
- Add an FAQ for "Why is my crate rebuilt?" (rust-lang/cargo#8927)
- Set docs.rs as the default extern-map for crates.io (rust-lang/cargo#8877)
- remove extra whitespace when running cargo -Z help (rust-lang/cargo#8924)
- Remove version from dev-dependencies to make it easier to publish. (rust-lang/cargo#8920)
- update dependency queue to consider cost for each node (rust-lang/cargo#8908)
- Fix some rustdoc warnings. (rust-lang/cargo#8911)
- Bump miow dependency to not invalidly assume memory layout (rust-lang/cargo#8909)
- Remove unnecessary trailing semicolons (rust-lang/cargo#8906)
- Fix custom_target_dependency test. (rust-lang/cargo#8907)
- fix: we don't ignore `version` for `git`/`path` deps now (rust-lang/cargo#8900)
- doc (book): add "Getting Started" subsection: "Essential Terminology" (rust-lang/cargo#8855)
Tested and validate results for panic unwind, panic abort, assert!()
macro, TerminatorKind::Assert (for example, numeric overflow), and
async/await.
Implemented a previous documented idea to change Assert handling to be
the same as FalseUnwind and Goto, so it doesn't get its own
BasicCoverageBlock anymore. This changed a couple of coverage regions,
but I validated those changes are not any worse than the prior results,
and probably help assure some consistency (even if some people might
disagree with how the code region is consistently computed).
Fixed issue with async/await. AggregateKind::Generator needs to be
handled like AggregateKind::Closure; coverage span for the outer async
function should not "cover" the async body, which is actually executed
in a separate "closure" MIR.
Validate lint docs separately.
This addresses some concerns raised in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76549#issuecomment-727638552 about errors with the lint docs being confusing and cumbersome. Errors from validating the lint documentation were being generated during `x.py doc` (and `x.py dist`), since extraction and validation are being done in a single step. This changes it so that extraction and validation are separated, so that `x.py doc` will not error if there is a validation problem, and tests are moved to `x.py test src/tools/lint-docs`.
This includes the following changes:
* Separate validation to `x.py test`.
* Added some more documentation on how to more easily modify and test the docs.
* Added more help to the error messages to hopefully provide more information on how to fix things.
The first commit just moves the code around, so you may consider looking at the other commits for a smaller diff.
