Enum should prefer discriminant zero for niche
Given an enum with unassigned zero-discriminant, rust should prefer it for niche selection.
Zero as discriminant for `Option<Enum>` makes it possible for LLVM to optimize resulting asm.
- Eliminate branch when expected value coincides.
- Use smaller instruction `test eax, eax` instead of `cmp eax, ?`
- Possible interaction with zeroed memory?
Example:
```rust
pub enum Size {
One = 1,
Two = 2,
Three = 3,
}
pub fn handle(x: Option<Size>) -> u8 {
match x {
None => {0}
Some(size) => {size as u8}
}
}
```
In this case discriminant zero is available as a niche.
Above example on nightly:
```asm
mov eax, edi
cmp al, 4
jne .LBB0_2
xor eax, eax
.LBB0_2:
ret
```
PR:
```asm
mov eax, edi
ret
```
I created this PR because I had a performance regression when I tried to use an enum to represent legal grapheme byte-length for utf8.
Using an enum instead of `NonZeroU8` [here](d683304f5d/src/internal/decoder_incomplete.rs (L90))
resulted in a performance regression of about 5%.
I consider this to be a somewhat realistic benchmark.
Thanks to `@ogoffart` for pointing me in the right direction!
Edit: Updated description
Improve error message for missing trait in trait impl
Fixes#88818. For the following example:
```rust
struct S { }
impl for S { }
```
the current output is:
```
error: missing trait in a trait impl
--> t1.rs:2:5
|
2 | impl for S { }
| ^
```
With my changes, I get:
```
error: missing trait in a trait impl
--> t1.rs:2:5
|
2 | impl for S { }
| ^
|
help: add a trait here
|
2 | impl Trait for S { }
| +++++
help: for an inherent impl, drop this `for`
|
2 - impl for S { }
2 + impl S { }
|
```
Fix duplicate bounds for const_trait_impl
Fixes#88383.
Compare the constness of the candidates before winnowing and removing a `~const` `BoundCandidate`.
Use smaller spans for some structured suggestions
Use more accurate suggestion spans for
* argument parse error
* fully qualified path
* missing code block type
* numeric casts
generic_const_exprs: use thir for abstract consts instead of mir
Changes `AbstractConst` building to use `thir` instead of `mir` so that there's less chance of consts unifying when they shouldn't because lowering to mir dropped information (see `abstract-consts-as-cast-5.rs` test)
r? `@lcnr`
Detect stricter constraints on gats where clauses in impls vs trait
I might try to see if I can do a bit more to improve these diagnostics, but any initial feedback is appreciated. I can also do any additional work in a followup PR.
r? `@estebank`
Fix ICE for functions with more than 65535 arguments
This pull request fixes#88577 by changing the `param_idx` field in the `Param` variant of `WellFormedLoc` from `u16` to `u32`, thus allowing for more than 65,535 arguments in a function. Note that I also added a regression test, but needed to add `// ignore-tidy-filelength` because the test is more than 8000 lines long.
Fix non-capturing closure return type coercion
Fixes#88097. For the example given there:
```rust
fn peculiar() -> impl Fn(u8) -> u8 {
return |x| x + 1
}
```
which incorrectly reports an error, I noticed something weird in the debug log:
```
DEBUG rustc_typeck::check::coercion coercion::try_find_coercion_lub([closure@test.rs:2:12: 2:21], [closure@test.rs:2:12: 2:21], exprs=1 exprs)
```
Apparently, `try_find_coercion_lub()` thinks that the LUB for two closure types always has to be a function pointer (which explains the `expected closure, found fn pointer` error in #88097). There is one corner case where that isn't true, though — namely, when the two closure types are equal, in which case the trivial LUB is the type itself. This PR fixes this by inserting an explicit check for type equality in `try_find_coercion_lub()`.
rustc: use more correct span data in for loop desugaring
Fixes#82462
Before:
help: consider adding semicolon after the expression so its temporaries are dropped sooner, before the local variables declared by the block are dropped
|
LL | for x in DroppingSlice(&*v).iter(); {
| +
After:
help: consider adding semicolon after the expression so its temporaries are dropped sooner, before the local variables declared by the block are dropped
|
LL | };
| +
This seems like a reasonable fix: since the desugared "expr_drop_temps_mut" contains the entire desugared loop construct, its span should contain the entire loop construct as well.
Emit proper errors when on missing closure braces
This commit focuses on emitting clean errors for the following syntax
error:
```
Some(42).map(|a|
dbg!(a);
a
);
```
Previous implementation tried to recover after parsing the closure body
(the `dbg` expression) by replacing the next `;` with a `,`, which made
the next expression belong to the next function argument. As such, the
following errors were emitted (among others):
- the semicolon token was not expected,
- a is not in scope,
- Option::map is supposed to take one argument, not two.
This commit allows us to gracefully handle this situation by adding
giving the parser the ability to remember when it has just parsed a
closure body inside a function call. When this happens, we can treat the
unexpected `;` specifically and try to parse as much statements as
possible in order to eat the whole block. When we can't parse statements
anymore, we generate a clean error indicating that the braces are
missing, and return an ExprKind::Err.
Closes#88065.
r? `@estebank`
This commit focuses on emitting clean errors for the following syntax
error:
```
Some(42).map(|a|
dbg!(a);
a
);
```
Previous implementation tried to recover after parsing the closure body
(the `dbg` expression) by replacing the next `;` with a `,`, which made
the next expression belong to the next function argument. As such, the
following errors were emitted (among others):
- the semicolon token was not expected,
- a is not in scope,
- Option::map is supposed to take one argument, not two.
This commit allows us to gracefully handle this situation by adding
giving the parser the ability to remember when it has just parsed a
closure body inside a function call. When this happens, we can treat the
unexpected `;` specifically and try to parse as much statements as
possible in order to eat the whole block. When we can't parse statements
anymore, we generate a clean error indicating that the braces are
missing, and return an ExprKind::Err.
Add a regression test for #88649
I noticed that #88649 does not have a regression test, so I add one in this PR.
The test fails with this without #88678:
```
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> /checkout/src/test/ui/consts/issue-88649.rs:13:52
|
LL | Foo::Variant1(x) | Foo::Variant2(x) if x => {}
| ^ StorageLive on a local that was already live
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.
```
Improve diagnostics for unary plus operators (#88276)
This pull request improves the diagnostics emitted on parsing a unary plus operator. See #88276.
Before:
```
error: expected expression, found `+`
--> src/main.rs:2:13
|
2 | let x = +1;
| ^ expected expression
```
After:
```
error: leading `+` is not supported
--> main.rs:2:13
|
2 | let x = +1;
| ^
| |
| unexpected `+`
| help: try removing the `+`
```
Suggest deriving traits if possible
This only applies to builtin derives as I don't think there is a
clean way to get the available derives in typeck.
Closes#85851
Remove `hir::GenericBound::Unsized`
Rather than "moving" the `?Sized` bounds to the param bounds, just also check where clauses in `astconv`. I also did some related cleanup here, but that's not strictly neccesary. Also going to do a perf run here.
r? `@estebank`
Fix handling of +whole-archive native link modifier.
This PR fixes a bug in `add_upstream_native_libraries` that led to the `+whole-archive` modifier being ignored when linking in native libs.
~~Note that the PR does not address the situation when `+whole-archive` is combined with `+bundle`.~~
`@wesleywiser's` commit adds validation code that turns combining `+whole-archive` with `+bundle` into an error.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88085.
r? `@petrochenkov`
cc `@wesleywiser` `@gcoakes`
Add tests for some const generics issues
closes#82956closes#84659closes#86530closes#86535
there is also a random test in here about array repeat expressions that I already had on this branch but it seems to fit the theme of this PR so kept it...
r? `@lcnr`
Improve structured tuple struct suggestion
Previously, the span was just for the constructor name, which meant it
would result in syntactically-invalid code when applied. Now, the span
is for the entire expression.
I also changed it to use `span_suggestion_verbose`, for two reasons:
1. Now that the suggestion span has been corrected, the output is a bit
cluttered and hard to read. Putting the suggestion its own window
creates more space.
2. It's easier to see what's being suggested, since now the version
after the suggestion is applied is shown.
r? `@davidtwco`
