Commit graph

42932 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yuki Okushi
ed8cfc86a2
Rollup merge of #100188 - chenyukang:fix-issue-100165, r=estebank
Parser will not suggest invalid expression when use public

Fixes #100165
2022-08-25 08:50:56 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
b3f178350a
Rollup merge of #99954 - dingxiangfei2009:break-out-let-else-higher-up, r=oli-obk
let-else: break out to one scope higher for let-else

```@est31``` This PR follows up with #99518 which is to break out to the last remainder scope. It breaks to the out-most `region_scope` of the block if the first statement is a `let-else`.
2022-08-25 08:50:55 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
f4550a6edf
Rollup merge of #99332 - jyn514:stabilize-label-break-value, r=petrochenkov
Stabilize `#![feature(label_break_value)]`

See the stabilization report in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1186213313.
2022-08-25 08:50:54 +09:00
Matthias Krüger
fb88e25c46
Rollup merge of #100945 - TaKO8Ki:add-missing-test-case-for-impl-generic-mismatch, r=Dylan-DPC
Add a missing test case for impl generic mismatch

This suggestion use different span depending on whether the method has generics or not, so I added a test case about the method with some generics.
2022-08-24 18:20:21 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
75b1b69171
Rollup merge of #100940 - TaKO8Ki:do-not-suggest-adding-bound-to-opaque-type, r=fee1-dead
Do not suggest adding a bound to a opaque type

fixes #100442
2022-08-24 18:20:20 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
8cdf4080c1
Rollup merge of #100919 - sanxiyn:parallel-liveness, r=oli-obk
Use par_body_owners for liveness

I did this refactoring while working on something else. Liveness is about bodies, there is no reason to use par_for_each_module here.

Tests are updated because things are visited in a different order. I checked diagnostics are same, just in a different (and IMO, better) order.
2022-08-24 18:20:15 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
ecf14d459c
Rollup merge of #100912 - tmiasko:make-include, r=TaKO8Ki
Diagnose missing includes in run-make tests
2022-08-24 18:20:14 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
95135bed61
Rollup merge of #100906 - ChayimFriedman2:map-index-mut, r=davidtwco
Suggest alternatives when trying to mutate a `HashMap`/`BTreeMap` via indexing

The error can be quite confusing to newcomers.

Fixes #100873.

I'm not so sure about the message, open to wording suggestions.
2022-08-24 18:20:13 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
0fcabec620
Rollup merge of #100888 - spastorino:coherence-negative-impls-implied-bounds, r=lcnr
Coherence negative impls implied bounds

Fixes #93875

This PR is rebased on top of #100789 and it would need to include that one which is already r+ed.

r? ``@nikomatsakis``

cc ``@lcnr`` (which I've talked about 3222f420d9, I guess after you finish your reordering of modules and work with OutlivesEnvironmentEnv this commit can just be reverted).
2022-08-24 18:20:11 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
f8e128f8ad
Rollup merge of #100826 - vincenzopalazzo:macros/wrong_sugg_with_positional_arg, r=TaKO8Ki
sugg: take into count the debug formatting

Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100648

This PR will fix a suggestion error by taking into consideration also the `:?` symbol and act in a different way

``@rustbot`` r? ``@compiler-errors``

N.B: I did not find a full way to test the change, any idea?
2022-08-24 18:20:09 +02:00
Takayuki Maeda
c57ecfae0e use a minimized example 2022-08-25 00:42:34 +09:00
Takayuki Maeda
56f9e29d2a add a missing test case for impl generic mismatch 2022-08-24 14:09:55 +09:00
Takayuki Maeda
3855e039a2 do not suggest adding a bound to a opaque type 2022-08-24 11:34:14 +09:00
Joshua Nelson
31e39446ec Stabilize #![feature(label_break_value)]
# Stabilization proposal

The feature was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50045 by est31 and has been in nightly since 2018-05-16 (over 4 years now).
There are [no open issues][issue-label] other than the tracking issue. There is a strong consensus that `break` is the right keyword and we should not use `return`.

There have been several concerns raised about this feature on the tracking issue (other than the one about tests, which has been fixed, and an interaction with try blocks, which has been fixed).
1. nrc's original comment about cost-benefit analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422235234
2. joshtriplett's comments about seeing use cases: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422281176
3. withoutboats's comments that Rust does not need more control flow constructs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450050630

Many different examples of code that's simpler using this feature have been provided:
- A lexer by rpjohnst which must repeat code without label-break-value: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422502014
- A snippet by SergioBenitez which avoids using a new function and adding several new return points to a function: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-427628251. This particular case would also work if `try` blocks were stabilized (at the cost of making the code harder to optimize).
- Several examples by JohnBSmith: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-434651395
- Several examples by Centril: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-440154733
- An example by petrochenkov where this is used in the compiler itself to avoid duplicating error checking code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-443557569
- Amanieu recently provided another example related to complex conditions, where try blocks would not have helped: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1184213006

Additionally, petrochenkov notes that this is strictly more powerful than labelled loops due to macros which accidentally exit a loop instead of being consumed by the macro matchers: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450246249

nrc later resolved their concern, mostly because of the aforementioned macro problems.
joshtriplett suggested that macros could be able to generate IR directly
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-451685983) but there are no open RFCs,
and the design space seems rather speculative.

joshtriplett later resolved his concerns, due to a symmetry between this feature and existing labelled break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-632960804

withoutboats has regrettably left the language team.

joshtriplett later posted that the lang team would consider starting an FCP given a stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1111269353

[issue-label]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AF-label_break_value+

 ## Report

+ Feature gate:
    - d695a497bb/src/test/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-label_break_value.rs
+ Diagnostics:
    - 6b2d3d5f3c/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs (L2629)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L749)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L1001)
    - 111df9e6ed/compiler/rustc_passes/src/loops.rs (L254)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L2079)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L1569)
+ Tests:
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_continue.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_unlabeled_break.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_illegal_uses.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/unused_labels.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/run-pass/for-loop-while/label_break_value.rs

 ## Interactions with other features

Labels follow the hygiene of local variables.

label-break-value is permitted within `try` blocks:
```rust
let _: Result<(), ()> = try {
    'foo: {
        Err(())?;
        break 'foo;
    }
};
```

label-break-value is disallowed within closures, generators, and async blocks:
```rust
'a: {
    || break 'a
    //~^ ERROR use of unreachable label `'a`
    //~| ERROR `break` inside of a closure
}
```

label-break-value is disallowed on [_BlockExpression_]; it can only occur as a [_LoopExpression_]:
```rust
fn labeled_match() {
    match false 'b: { //~ ERROR block label not supported here
        _ => {}
    }
}

macro_rules! m {
    ($b:block) => {
        'lab: $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        unsafe $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        |x: u8| -> () $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
    }
}

fn foo() {
    m!({});
}
```

[_BlockExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
[_LoopExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html
2022-08-23 21:14:12 -05:00
bors
87991d5f5d Auto merge of #100675 - Xiretza:fluent-mandate-crate-prefix, r=davidtwco
fluent: mandate slug names to be prefixed by crate name

This is currently only convention, but not actively checked for.

Additionally, improve error messages to highlight the path of the offending fluent file rather than the identifier preceding it.

This will conflict with #100671, so I'll leave it as draft until that's merged.
2022-08-23 22:30:07 +00:00
Vincenzo Palazzo
3d8c7d2c0a sugg: take into count the debug formatting
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
2022-08-23 21:57:30 +00:00
Chayim Refael Friedman
b0255a1849 Suggest alternatives when trying to mutate a HashMap/BTreeMap via indexing
The error can be quite confusing to newcomers.
2022-08-23 15:15:34 +00:00
Dylan DPC
8733550870
Rollup merge of #100309 - compiler-errors:issue-100300, r=sanxiyn
Extend comma suggestion to cases where fields arent missing

Fixes #100300
2022-08-23 20:40:02 +05:30
Dylan DPC
4d1c273b32
Rollup merge of #99249 - cjgillot:no-reparse-fn, r=fee1-dead
Do not re-parse function signatures to suggest generics

This PR uses the existing resolution rib infrastructure to channel the correct span information to suggest generic parameters.  This allows to avoid re-parsing a function's source code.

Drive-by cleanup: this removes useless `FnItemRibKind` from late resolution ribs.  All the use cases are already covered by `ItemRibKind` and `AssocItemRibKind` which have more precise semantics.
2022-08-23 20:40:01 +05:30
Santiago Pastorino
ac0b6af37b
Permit negative impls coherence to take advantage of implied bounds 2022-08-23 08:55:43 -03:00
Seo Sanghyeon
f280138c7c Use par_body_owners for liveness 2022-08-23 20:53:02 +09:00
yukang
351acc87f5 parser will not give wrong help message for 'public' 2022-08-23 17:02:40 +08:00
Tomasz Miąsko
ba74a628ad Diagnose missing includes in run-make tests 2022-08-23 10:06:06 +02:00
bors
38528d4dc0 Auto merge of #100904 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-z3yzivj, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #100382 (Make the GATS self outlives error take into GATs in the inputs)
 - #100565 (Suggest adding a missing semicolon before an item)
 - #100641 (Add the armv4t-none-eabi target to the supported_targets)
 - #100789 (Use separate infcx to solve obligations during negative coherence)
 - #100832 (Some small bootstrap cleanup)
 - #100861 (fix ICE with extra-const-ub-checks)
 - #100862 (tidy: remove crossbeam-utils)
 - #100887 (Refactor part of codegen_call_terminator)
 - #100893 (Remove out-of-context comment in `mem::MaybeUninit` documentation)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-23 05:22:05 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
f5fcac9978
Rollup merge of #100861 - RalfJung:const-ice, r=oli-obk
fix ICE with extra-const-ub-checks

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100771
2022-08-23 06:55:28 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
579dfa42be
Rollup merge of #100789 - compiler-errors:issue-99662, r=spastorino
Use separate infcx to solve obligations during negative coherence

I feel like I fixed this already but I may have fixed it then forgot to push the branch...

Also fixes up some redundant param-envs being passed around (since they're already passed around in the `Obligation`)

Fixes #99662

r? ``@spastorino``
2022-08-23 06:55:26 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
54d0f50677
Rollup merge of #100565 - TaKO8Ki:suggest-adding-missing-semicolon-before-item, r=compiler-errors
Suggest adding a missing semicolon before an item

fixes #100533
2022-08-23 06:55:24 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
e568cb45fe
Rollup merge of #100382 - jackh726:gat-self-outlives-input, r=compiler-errors
Make the GATS self outlives error take into GATs in the inputs

Before, the reasoning was that outlives should factor in to the outlives error, because that value is produced and inputs aren't. However, this is potentially confusing, and we can just require this for now and relax it later if we need. GATs in where clauses still don't count for the self outlives error, and I've added a test for that.

This now errors:
```rust
trait Input {
    type Item<'a>;
    //~^ missing required
    fn takes_item<'a>(&'a self, item: Self::Item<'a>);
}
```

I've also added a test that this does not:
```rust
trait WhereClause {
    type Item<'a>;
    fn takes_item<'a>(&'a self) where Self::Item<'a>: ;
}
```

r? ``@compiler-errors``
2022-08-23 06:55:23 +02:00
bors
7e3e8a816f Auto merge of #100678 - GuillaumeGomez:improve-rustdoc-json-tests, r=aDotInTheVoid
Improve rustdoc json tests

Fixes #100588.

r? `@aDotInTheVoid`
2022-08-23 02:40:52 +00:00
Camille GILLOT
613dc2204d Improve local generic parameter suggestions. 2022-08-23 00:08:42 +02:00
bors
015a824f2d Auto merge of #99762 - Nilstrieb:unreachable-prop, r=oli-obk
UnreachableProp: Preserve unreachable branches for multiple targets

Before, UnreachablePropagation removed all unreachable branches. This was a pessimization, as it removed information about reachability that was used later in the optimization pipeline.

For example, this code
```rust
pub enum Two { A, B }
pub fn identity(x: Two) -> Two {
    match x {
        Two::A => Two::A,
        Two::B => Two::B,
    }
}
```

basically has `switchInt() -> [0: 0, 1: 1, otherwise: unreachable]` for the match. This allows it to be transformed into a simple `x`. If we remove the unreachable branch, the transformation becomes illegal.

This was the problem keeping `UnreachablePropagation` from being enabled, so we can enable it now.

Something similar already happened in #77800, but it did not show a perf improvement there. Let's try it again anyways!

Fixes #68105, although that issue has been fixed for a long time (see #77680).
2022-08-22 20:28:16 +00:00
bors
a785176741 Auto merge of #100881 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-q9rr658, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #98200 (Expand potential inner `Or` pattern for THIR)
 - #99770 (Make some const prop mir-opt tests `unit-test`s)
 - #99957 (Rework Ipv6Addr::is_global to check for global reachability rather than global scope - rebase)
 - #100331 (Guarantee `try_reserve` preserves the contents on error)
 - #100336 (Fix two const_trait_impl issues)
 - #100713 (Convert diagnostics in parser/expr to SessionDiagnostic)
 - #100820 (Use pointer `is_aligned*` methods)
 - #100872 (Add guarantee that Vec::default() does not alloc)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-22 17:46:57 +00:00
Dylan DPC
14c8a68e49
Rollup merge of #100336 - fee1-dead-contrib:fix-wf-const-trait, r=oli-obk
Fix two const_trait_impl issues

r? ``@oli-obk``

Fixes #100222.
Fixes #100543.
2022-08-22 20:34:13 +05:30
Dylan DPC
e77c2084c6
Rollup merge of #99770 - Nilstrieb:mir-pass-unit-test, r=oli-obk
Make some const prop mir-opt tests `unit-test`s

Most of these have no or only tiny diffs beyond line numbers being changed (would it make sense to not have line numbers in mir-opt tests?). Some things changed a bit, but I think it should all be fine, not sure though.
2022-08-22 20:34:09 +05:30
Dylan DPC
56ba13ac7f
Rollup merge of #98200 - ouz-a:issue-98177, r=oli-obk
Expand potential inner `Or` pattern for THIR

Code assumed there wouldn't be a deeper `Or` pattern inside expanded `PatStack` this fixes it by looking for the `Or` pattern inside expanded `PatStack`.

A more ideal solution would be recursively doing this but I haven't found a good way to do that.
_fixes #97898_
2022-08-22 20:34:08 +05:30
Nilstrieb
5d7ce21b6b bless mir-opt tests 2022-08-22 15:19:40 +02:00
Nilstrieb
d3ee0eaa3f bless ui tests 2022-08-22 14:06:55 +02:00
Deadbeef
f1db3be9cf fix tidy 2022-08-22 11:44:04 +00:00
Deadbeef
f019b6c5e8 Overhaul 100222 test; wf always remap to nonconst 2022-08-22 11:28:01 +00:00
Deadbeef
d744f36ea2 Fix wf check on #[const_trait] return types 2022-08-22 10:53:26 +00:00
bors
ee8c31e64d Auto merge of #100868 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-a1hfi1r, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #93162 (Std module docs improvements)
 - #99386 (Add tests that check `Vec::retain` predicate execution order.)
 - #99915 (Recover keywords in trait bounds)
 - #100694 (Migrate rustc_ast_passes diagnostics to `SessionDiagnostic` and translatable messages (first part))
 - #100757 (Catch overflow early)

Failed merges:

 - #99917 (Move Error trait into core)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-22 08:32:41 +00:00
Xiretza
0c7da94be0 fluent: update tests 2022-08-22 08:42:46 +02:00
Dylan DPC
88e39b2c2e
Rollup merge of #100757 - ouz-a:issue-95134, r=jackh726
Catch overflow early

Although this code should raise an overflow error, it didn't because [check_recursion_limit](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_trait_selection/traits/select/struct.SelectionContext.html#method.check_recursion_limit) it checks for `depth = 128` but not for `129` which should have triggered the overflow error. Anyways this catches that error early.

Fixes #95134
2022-08-22 11:45:45 +05:30
Dylan DPC
3842117ef2
Rollup merge of #99915 - WaffleLapkin:recover_keyword_bounds, r=compiler-errors
Recover keywords in trait bounds

(_this pr was inspired by [this tweet](https://twitter.com/Azumanga/status/1552982326409367561)_)

Recover keywords in trait bound, motivational example:
```rust
fn f(_: impl fn()) {} // mistyped, meant `Fn`
```

<details><summary>Current nightly (3 needless and confusing errors!)</summary>
<p>

```text
error: expected identifier, found keyword `fn`
 --> ./t.rs:1:15
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |               ^^ expected identifier, found keyword
  |
help: escape `fn` to use it as an identifier
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl r#fn()) {}
  |               ++

error: expected one of `:` or `|`, found `)`
 --> ./t.rs:1:19
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |                   ^ expected one of `:` or `|`

error: expected one of `!`, `(`, `)`, `,`, `?`, `for`, `~`, lifetime, or path, found keyword `fn`
 --> ./t.rs:1:15
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |              -^^ expected one of 9 possible tokens
  |              |
  |              help: missing `,`

error: at least one trait must be specified
 --> ./t.rs:1:10
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |          ^^^^
```

</p>
</details>

This PR:
```text
error: expected identifier, found keyword `fn`
 --> ./t.rs:1:15
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
  |               ^^ expected identifier, found keyword
  |
help: escape `fn` to use it as an identifier
  |
1 | fn _f(_: impl r#fn()) {}
  |               ++

error[E0405]: cannot find trait `r#fn` in this scope
  --> ./t.rs:1:15
   |
1  | fn _f(_: impl fn()) {}
   |               ^^ help: a trait with a similar name exists (notice the capitalization): `Fn`
   |
  ::: /home/waffle/projects/repos/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:74:1
   |
74 | pub trait Fn<Args>: FnMut<Args> {
   | ------------------------------- similarly named trait `Fn` defined here
```

It would be nice to have suggestion in the first error like "have you meant `Fn` trait", instead of a separate error, but the recovery is deep inside ident parsing, which makes it a lot harder to do.

r? `@compiler-errors`
2022-08-22 11:45:42 +05:30
bors
a9bb589cd6 Auto merge of #100676 - lcnr:implied-bounds-yay, r=nikomatsakis
implied bounds: explicitly state which types are assumed to be wf

Adds a new query which maps each definition to the types which that definition assumes to be well formed. The intent is to make it easier to reason about implied bounds.

This change should not influence the user-facing behavior of rustc. Notably, `borrowck` still only assumes that the function signature of associated functions is well formed while `wfcheck` assumes that the both the function signature and the impl trait ref is well formed. Not sure if that by itself can trigger UB or whether it's just annoying.

As a next step, we can add `WellFormed` predicates to `predicates_of` of these items and can stop adding the wf bounds at each place which uses them. I also intend to move the computation from `assumed_wf_types` to `implied_bounds` into the `param_env` computation. This requires me to take a deeper look at `compare_predicate_entailment` which is currently somewhat weird wrt implied bounds so I am not touching this here.

r? `@nikomatsakis`
2022-08-22 06:10:26 +00:00
bors
3ce46b74aa Auto merge of #100668 - nnethercote:use-AttrVec-more, r=spastorino
Use `AttrVec` more

In some places we use `Vec<Attribute>` and some places we use
`ThinVec<Attribute>` (a.k.a. `AttrVec`). This results in various points
where we have to convert between `Vec` and `ThinVec`.

This commit changes the places that use `Vec<Attribute>` to use
`AttrVec`. A lot of this is mechanical and boring, but there are
some interesting parts:
- It adds a few new methods to `ThinVec`.
- It implements `MapInPlace` for `ThinVec`, and introduces a macro to
  avoid the repetition of this trait for `Vec`, `SmallVec`, and
  `ThinVec`.

Overall, it makes the code a little nicer, and has little effect on
performance. But it is a precursor to removing
`rustc_data_structures::ThinVec` and replacing it with
`thin_vec::ThinVec`, which is implemented more efficiently.

r? `@spastorino`
2022-08-22 00:34:02 +00:00
Ralf Jung
d7ee421870 fix ICE with extra-const-ub-checks 2022-08-21 20:00:38 -04:00
bors
0b71ffca18 Auto merge of #100654 - compiler-errors:rework-point-at-arg, r=estebank
Rework "point at arg" suggestions to be more accurate

Fixes #100560

Introduce a new set of `ObligationCauseCode`s which have additional bookeeping for what expression caused the obligation, and which predicate caused the obligation. This allows us to look at the _unsubstituted_ signature to find out which parameter or generic type argument caused an obligaton to fail.

This means that (in most cases) we significantly improve the likelihood of pointing out the right argument that causes a fulfillment error. Also, since this logic isn't happening in just the `select_where_possible_and_mutate_fulfillment()` calls in the argument checking code, but instead during all trait selection in `FnCtxt`, we are also able to point out the correct argument even if inference means that we don't know whether an obligation has failed until well after a call expression has been checked.

r? `@ghost`
2022-08-21 21:52:56 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
619b8abaa6 Use AttrVec in more places.
In some places we use `Vec<Attribute>` and some places we use
`ThinVec<Attribute>` (a.k.a. `AttrVec`). This results in various points
where we have to convert between `Vec` and `ThinVec`.

This commit changes the places that use `Vec<Attribute>` to use
`AttrVec`. A lot of this is mechanical and boring, but there are
some interesting parts:
- It adds a few new methods to `ThinVec`.
- It implements `MapInPlace` for `ThinVec`, and introduces a macro to
  avoid the repetition of this trait for `Vec`, `SmallVec`, and
  `ThinVec`.

Overall, it makes the code a little nicer, and has little effect on
performance. But it is a precursor to removing
`rustc_data_structures::thin_vec::ThinVec` and replacing it with
`thin_vec::ThinVec`, which is implemented more efficiently.
2022-08-22 07:35:33 +10:00
Nilstrieb
18bfcd374f bless mir-opt tests 2022-08-21 21:21:46 +02:00