List possible keys of the -L rustc option.
Since `rustc --help -v` does not describe it, only *rustc.1* man page, but there is no man for Windows.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @steveklabnik
This commit applies all stabilizations, renamings, and deprecations that the
library team has decided on for the upcoming 1.9 release. All tracking issues
have gone through a cycle-long "final comment period" and the specific APIs
stabilized/deprecated are:
Stable
* `std::panic`
* `std::panic::catch_unwind` (renamed from `recover`)
* `std::panic::resume_unwind` (renamed from `propagate`)
* `std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe` (renamed from `AssertRecoverSafe`)
* `std::panic::UnwindSafe` (renamed from `RecoverSafe`)
* `str::is_char_boundary`
* `<*const T>::as_ref`
* `<*mut T>::as_ref`
* `<*mut T>::as_mut`
* `AsciiExt::make_ascii_uppercase`
* `AsciiExt::make_ascii_lowercase`
* `char::decode_utf16`
* `char::DecodeUtf16`
* `char::DecodeUtf16Error`
* `char::DecodeUtf16Error::unpaired_surrogate`
* `BTreeSet::take`
* `BTreeSet::replace`
* `BTreeSet::get`
* `HashSet::take`
* `HashSet::replace`
* `HashSet::get`
* `OsString::with_capacity`
* `OsString::clear`
* `OsString::capacity`
* `OsString::reserve`
* `OsString::reserve_exact`
* `OsStr::is_empty`
* `OsStr::len`
* `std::os::unix::thread`
* `RawPthread`
* `JoinHandleExt`
* `JoinHandleExt::as_pthread_t`
* `JoinHandleExt::into_pthread_t`
* `HashSet::hasher`
* `HashMap::hasher`
* `CommandExt::exec`
* `File::try_clone`
* `SocketAddr::set_ip`
* `SocketAddr::set_port`
* `SocketAddrV4::set_ip`
* `SocketAddrV4::set_port`
* `SocketAddrV6::set_ip`
* `SocketAddrV6::set_port`
* `SocketAddrV6::set_flowinfo`
* `SocketAddrV6::set_scope_id`
* `<[T]>::copy_from_slice`
* `ptr::read_volatile`
* `ptr::write_volatile`
* The `#[deprecated]` attribute
* `OpenOptions::create_new`
Deprecated
* `std::raw::Slice` - use raw parts of `slice` module instead
* `std::raw::Repr` - use raw parts of `slice` module instead
* `str::char_range_at` - use slicing plus `chars()` plus `len_utf8`
* `str::char_range_at_reverse` - use slicing plus `chars().rev()` plus `len_utf8`
* `str::char_at` - use slicing plus `chars()`
* `str::char_at_reverse` - use slicing plus `chars().rev()`
* `str::slice_shift_char` - use `chars()` plus `Chars::as_str`
* `CommandExt::session_leader` - use `before_exec` instead.
Closes#27719
cc #27751 (deprecating the `Slice` bits)
Closes#27754Closes#27780Closes#27809Closes#27811Closes#27830Closes#28050Closes#29453Closes#29791Closes#29935Closes#30014Closes#30752Closes#31262
cc #31398 (still need to deal with `before_exec`)
Closes#31405Closes#31572Closes#31755Closes#31756
Save/load incremental compilation dep graph
Contains the code to serialize/deserialize the dep graph to disk between executions. We also hash the item contents and compare to the new hashes. Also includes a unit test harness. There are definitely some known limitations, such as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32014 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32015, but I am leaving those for follow-up work.
Note that this PR builds on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/32007, so the overlapping commits can be excluded from review.
r? @michaelwoerister
You can now pass `-Z incremental=dir` as well as saying `-Z
query-dep-graph` if you want to enable queries for some other
purpose. Accessor functions take the place of computed boolean flags.
... as single "internal compiler error" entry point.
The macros pass `file!()`, `line!()` and `format_args!(...)` on to a
cold, never-inlined function, ultimately calling `bug()` or `span_bug()`
on the `Handler` from `session::diagnostic()` via the tcx in tls or,
failing that, panicking directly.
Gate parser recovery via debugflag
Gate parser recovery via debugflag
Put in `-Z continue_parse_after_error`
This works by adding a method, `fn abort_if_no_parse_recovery`, to the
diagnostic handler in `syntax::errors`, and calling it after each
error is emitted in the parser.
(We might consider adding a debugflag to do such aborts in other
places where we are currently attempting recovery, such as resolve,
but I think the parser is the really important case to handle in the
face of #31994 and the parser bugs of varying degrees that were
injected by parse error recovery.)
r? @nikomatsakis
This works by adding a boolean flag, `continue_after_error`, to
`syntax::errors::Handler` that can be imperatively set to `true` or
`false` via a new `fn set_continue_after_error`.
The flag starts off true (since we generally try to recover from
compiler errors, and `Handler` is shared across all phases).
Then, during the `phase_1_parse_input`, we consult the setting of the
`-Z continue-parse-after-error` debug flag to determine whether we
should leave the flag set to `true` or should change it to `false`.
----
(We might consider adding a debugflag to do such aborts in other
places where we are currently attempting recovery, such as resolve,
but I think the parser is the really important case to handle in the
face of #31994 and the parser bugs of varying degrees that were
injected by parse error recovery.)
melt the ICE when lowering an impossible range
Emit a fatal error instead of panicking when HIR lowering encounters a range with no `end` point.
This involved adding a method to wire up `LoweringContext::span_fatal`.
Fixes#32245 (cc @nodakai).
r? @nrc
Restrict constants in patterns
This implements [RFC 1445](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1445-restrict-constants-in-patterns.md). The primary change is to limit the types of constants used in patterns to those that *derive* `Eq` (note that implementing `Eq` is not sufficient). This has two main effects:
1. Floating point constants are linted, and will eventually be disallowed. This is because floating point constants do not implement `Eq` but only `PartialEq`. This check replaces the existing special case code that aimed to detect the use of `NaN`.
2. Structs and enums must derive `Eq` to be usable within a match.
This is a [breaking-change]: if you encounter a problem, you are most likely using a constant in an expression where the type of the constant is some struct that does not currently implement
`Eq`. Something like the following:
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
The easiest and most future compatible fix is to annotate the type in question with `#[derive(Eq)]` (note that merely *implementing* `Eq` is not enough, it must be *derived*):
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Another good option is to rewrite the match arm to use an `if` condition (this is also particularly good for floating point types, which implement `PartialEq` but not `Eq`):
```rust
match foo {
c if c == SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Finally, a third alternative is to tag the type with `#[structural_match]`; but this is not recommended, as the attribute is never expected to be stabilized. Please see RFC #1445 for more details.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31434
r? @pnkfelix
End-less ranges (`a...`) don't parse but bad syntax extensions could
conceivably produce them. Unbounded ranges (`...`) do parse and are
caught here.
The other panics in HIR lowering are all for unexpanded macros, which
cannot be constructed by bad syntax extensions.
This commit adds support for *truly* unstable options in the compiler, as well
as adding warnings for the start of the deprecation path of
unstable-but-not-really options. Specifically, the following behavior is now in
place for handling unstable options:
* As before, an unconditional error is emitted if an unstable option is passed
and the `-Z unstable-options` flag is not present. Note that passing another
`-Z` flag does not require passing `-Z unstable-options` as well.
* New flags added to the compiler will be in the `Unstable` category as opposed
to the `UnstableButNotReally` category which means they will unconditionally
emit an error when used on stable.
* All current flags are in a category where they will emit warnings when used
that the option will soon be a hard error.
Also as before, it is intended that `-Z` is akin to `#![feature]` in a crate
where it is required to unlock unstable functionality. A nightly compiler which
is used without any `-Z` flags should only be exercising stable behavior.
Tools which rely on DWARF for generating code coverage report, don't generate accurate numbers on test builds. For instance, [this sample main](757bdbf388/src/main.rs) returns [100% coverage](https://coveralls.io/builds/4940156/source?filename=main.rs) when [kcov](https://github.com/SimonKagstrom/kcov/) runs.
With @pnkfelix 's great help, we could narrow down the issue: The linker strips unused function during phase 6. Here's a patch which stops stripping when someone calls `rustc --test $ARGS`. @pnkfelix wasn't sure if we should add a new flag, or just use --test. What do you think @alexcrichton ?
Also, I'm not too sure: where is the best place to add a test for this addition?
Thanks for the help!
Turning gc-sections off improves code coverage based for tools which
use DWARF debugging information (like kcov). Otherwise dead code is
stripped and kcov returns a coverage percentage that doesn't reflect
reality.
This commit is an implementation of the new compiler flags required by [RFC
1361][rfc]. This specifically adds a new `cfg` option to the `--print` flag to
the compiler. This new directive will print the defined `#[cfg]` directives by
the compiler for the target in question.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1361-cargo-cfg-dependencies.md
