Permit ty::Bool in const generics for v0 mangling
This should unbreak using new-symbol-mangling = true in config.toml (once it lands in beta anyway).
Fixes#76365 (well, it will, but seems fine to close as soon as we have support)
r? @eddyb (for mangling) but I'm okay with some other reviewer too :)
Bypass const_item_mutation if const's type has Drop impl
Follow-up to #75573. This PR disables the const_item_mutation lint in cases that the const has a Drop impl which observes the mutation.
```rust
struct Log { msg: &'static str }
const LOG: Log = Log { msg: "" };
impl Drop for Log {
fn drop(&mut self) { println!("{}", self.msg); }
}
LOG.msg = "wow"; // prints "wow"
```
r? @Aaron1011
resolve: prohibit anon const non-static lifetimes
Fixes#75323, fixes#74447 and fixes#73375.
This PR prohibits non-static lifetimes in anonymous constants when only the `min_const_generics` feature is enabled. ~~To do so, `to_region_vid`'s `bug!` had to be changed into a delayed bug, which unfortunately required providing it a `TyCtxt`.~~
---
~~While I am happy with how the implementation of the error turned out in `rustc_passes::check_const`, emitting an error wasn't sufficient to avoid hitting the ICE later. I also tried implementing the error in `rustc_mir::transform::check_consts::validation` and that worked, but it didn't silence the ICE either. To silence the ICE, I changed it to a delayed bug which worked but was more invasive that I would have liked, and required I return an incorrect lifetime. It's possible that this check should be implemented earlier in the compiler to make the invasive changes unnecessary, but I wasn't sure where that would be and wanted to get some feedback first.~~
The approach taken by this PR has been changed to implement the error in name resolution, which ended up being much simpler.
cc @rust-lang/wg-const-eval
r? @lcnr
This commit modifies name resolution to emit an error when non-static
lifetimes are used in anonymous constants when the `min_const_generics`
feature is enabled.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Disable the SimplifyArmIdentity mir-opt
The optimization still has some bugs that need to be worked out
such as #77359.
We can try re-enabling this again after the known issues are resolved.
r? `@oli-obk`
rustc_metadata: Do not forget to encode inherent impls for foreign types
So I tried to move FFI interface for LLVM from `rustc_codegen_llvm` to `rustc_llvm` and immediately encountered this fascinating issue.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/46665.
Split sys_common::Mutex in StaticMutex and MovableMutex.
The (unsafe) `Mutex` from `sys_common` had a rather complicated interface. You were supposed to call `init()` manually, unless you could guarantee it was neither moved nor used reentrantly.
Calling `destroy()` was also optional, although it was unclear if 1) resources might be leaked or not, and 2) if `destroy()` should only be called when `init()` was called.
This allowed for a number of interesting (confusing?) different ways to use this `Mutex`, all captured in a single type.
In practice, this type was only ever used in two ways:
1. As a static variable. In this case, neither `init()` nor `destroy()` are called. The variable is never moved, and it is never used reentrantly. It is only ever locked using the `LockGuard`, never with `raw_lock`.
2. As a `Box`ed variable. In this case, both `init()` and `destroy()` are called, it will be moved and possibly used reentrantly.
No other combinations are used anywhere in `std`.
This change simplifies things by splitting this `Mutex` type into two types matching the two use cases: `StaticMutex` and `MovableMutex`.
The interface of both new types is now both safer and simpler. The first one does not call nor expose `init`/`destroy`, and the second one calls those automatically in its `new()` and `Drop` functions. Also, the locking functions of `MovableMutex` are no longer unsafe.
---
This will also make it easier to conditionally box mutexes later, by moving that decision into sys/sys_common. Some of the mutex implementations (at least those of Wasm and 'sys/unsupported') are safe to move, so wouldn't need a box. ~~(But that's blocked on #76932 for now.)~~ (See #77380.)
Refactor memchr to allow optimization
Closes#75659
The implementation already uses naive search if the slice if short enough, but the case is complicated enough to not be optimized away. This PR refactors memchr so that it exists early when the slice is short enough.
Codegen-wise, as shown in #75659, memchr was not inlined previously so the only way I could find to test this is to check if there is no memchr call. Let me know if there is a more robust solution here.
Overhaul const-checking diagnostics
The primary purpose of this PR was to remove `NonConstOp::STOPS_CONST_CHECKING`, which causes any additional errors found by the const-checker to be silenced. I used this flag to preserve diagnostic parity with `qualify_min_const_fn.rs`, which has since been removed.
However, simply removing the flag caused a deluge of errors in some cases, since an error would be emitted any time a local or temporary had a wrong type. To remedy this, I added an alternative system (`DiagnosticImportance`) to silence additional error messages that were likely to distract the user from the underlying issue. When an error of the highest importance occurs, all less important errors are silenced. When no error of the highest importance occurs, all less important errors are emitted after checking is complete. Following the suggestions from the important error is usually enough to fix the less important errors, so this should lead to better UX most of the time.
There's also some unrelated diagnostics improvements in this PR isolated in their own commits. Splitting them out would be possible, but a bit of a pain. This isn't as tidy as some of my other PRs, but it should *only* affect diagnostics, never whether or not something passes const-checking. Note that there are a few trivial exceptions to this, like banning `Yield` in all const-contexts, not just `const fn`.
As always, meant to be reviewed commit-by-commit.
r? `@oli-obk`
const evaluatable: improve `TooGeneric` handling
Instead of emitting an error in `fulfill`, we now correctly stall on inference variables.
As `const_eval_resolve` returns `ErrorHandled::TooGeneric` when encountering generic parameters on which
we actually do want to error, we check for inference variables and eagerly emit an error if they don't exist, returning `ErrorHandled::Reported` instead.
Also contains a small bugfix for `ConstEquate` where we previously only stalled on type variables. This is probably a leftover from
when we did not yet support stalling on const inference variables.
r? @oli-obk cc @varkor @eddyb
Fix recursive nonterminal expansion during pretty-print/reparse check
Makes progress towards #43081
In PR #73084, we started recursively expanded nonterminals during the
pretty-print/reparse check, allowing them to be properly compared
against the reparsed tokenstream.
Unfortunately, the recursive logic in that PR only handles the case
where a nonterminal appears inside a `TokenTree::Delimited`. If a
nonterminal appears directly in the expanded tokens of another
nonterminal, the inner nonterminal will not be expanded.
This PR fixes the recursive expansion of nonterminals, ensuring that
they are expanded wherever they occur.
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #77037 (more tiny clippy cleanups)
- #77233 (BTreeMap: keep an eye out on the size of the main components)
- #77280 (Ensure that all LLVM components requested by tests are available on CI)
- #77284 (library: Forward compiler-builtins "mem" feature)
- #77296 (liveness: Use Option::None to represent absent live nodes)
- #77322 (Add unstable book docs for `-Zunsound-mir-opts`)
- #77328 (Use `rtassert!` instead of `assert!` from the child process after fork() in std::sys::unix::process::Command::spawn())
- #77331 (Add test for async/await combined with const-generics.)
- #77338 (Fix typo in alloc vec comment)
- #77340 (Alloc vec use imported path)
- #77345 (Add test for issue #74761)
- #77348 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
Add support for cmse_nonsecure_entry attribute
This pull request adds the `cmse_nonsecure_entry` attribute under an unstable feature.
I was not sure if it was fine for me to send directly the pull-request or if I should submit a RFC first. I was told on Zulip that it was fine to do so but please close it if I need first submit a RFC or follow another process instead.
The `cmse_nonsecure_entry` attribute is a LLVM attribute that will be available in LLVM 11. I plan to rebase on the [upgrade PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73526) once merged to make this one compile.
This attribute modifies code generation of the function as explained [here](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ecm0359818/latest/) to make it work with the TrustZone-M hardware feature. This feature is only available on `thumbv8m` targets so I created an error for that if one tries to use this attribute for another target.
I added this attribute in Rust as any other LLVM attribute are added but since this one is target-dependent I am not sure if it was the best thing to do. Please indicate me if you think of other ways, like isolating target-dependent attributes together.
----------------
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75835
This patch adds support for the LLVM cmse_nonsecure_entry attribute.
This is a target-dependent attribute that only has sense for the
thumbv8m Rust targets.
You can find more information about this attribute here:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ecm0359818/latest/
Signed-off-by: Hugues de Valon <hugues.devalon@arm.com>
