Commit graph

2080 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mazdak Farrokhzad
57da9d3269
Rollup merge of #66755 - mark-i-m:const-vec-new, r=ecstatic-morse
Remove a const-if-hack in RawVec

r? @ecstatic-morse

cc @Centril
2019-12-20 12:17:18 +01:00
Mark Rousskov
9d1baaf11d
Rollup merge of #67281 - llogiq:nonoverlapping-insert, r=alexcrichton
add string.insert benchmarks

This adds benchmarks for `String::insert` and `String::insert_str`
2019-12-19 17:53:53 -05:00
Mark Mansi
7d268119f0 no need to bootstrap 2019-12-18 20:19:05 -06:00
Mark Mansi
253543560a add fixme 2019-12-18 20:19:05 -06:00
Mark Mansi
951f041347 fix import 2019-12-18 20:19:05 -06:00
Mark Mansi
baaf864e07 use usize::MAX instead of !0 2019-12-18 20:19:05 -06:00
Mark Mansi
3ec3fca414 remove a bit more hackery 2019-12-18 20:19:05 -06:00
Mark Mansi
17aa0cb2ca Remove a const-if-hack in RawVec 2019-12-18 20:19:05 -06:00
Mark Rousskov
82184440ec Propagate cfg bootstrap 2019-12-18 12:16:19 -05:00
Andre Bogus
c6321a4df8 Add benchmarks for string::insert(_str) 2019-12-18 07:18:05 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
c34ea91a9d
Rollup merge of #65778 - bdonlan:stable_weak_count, r=dtolnay
Stabilize `std::{rc,sync}::Weak::{weak_count, strong_count}`

* Original PR: #56696
* Tracking issue: #57977

Closes: #57977

Supporting comments:

> Although these were added for testing, it is occasionally useful to have a way to probe optimistically for whether a weak pointer has become dangling, without actually taking the overhead of manipulating atomics. Are there any plans to stabilize this?

_Originally posted by @bdonlan in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57977#issuecomment-516970921_

> Having this stabilized would help. Currently, the only way to check if a weak pointer has become dangling is to call `upgrade`, which is by far expensive.

_Originally posted by @glebpom in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57977#issuecomment-526934709_

Not sure if stabilizing these warrants a full RFC, so throwing this out here as a start for now.

Note: per CONTRIBUTING.md, I ran the tidy checks, but they seem to be failing on unchanged files (primarily in `src/stdsimd`).
2019-12-16 05:23:26 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
64f83915de
Rollup merge of #67300 - aloucks:issue-65970, r=rkruppe
Restore original implementation of Vec::retain

This PR reverts #48065, which aimed to optimize `Vec::retain` by making use of `Vec::drain_filter`. Unfortunately at that time, `drain_filter` was unsound.

The soundness hole in `Vec::drain_filter` was fixed in #61224 by guaranteeing that cleanup logic runs via a nested `Drop`, even in the event of a panic. Implementing this nested drop affects codegen (apparently?) and results in slower code.

Fixes #65970
2019-12-15 05:57:27 +01:00
David Tolnay
9778e03665
Bump Weak::strong_count/weak_count stabilizations from 1.40 to 1.41 2019-12-14 19:26:25 -08:00
Aaron Loucks
7ea6c46a6d Restore original implementation of Vec::retain
This PR reverts #48065, which aimed to optimize `Vec::retain` by
making use of `Vec::drain_filter`. Unfortunately at that time,
`drain_filter` was unsound.

The soundness hole in `Vec::drain_filter` was fixed in #61224 by
guaranteeing that cleanup logic runs via a nested `Drop`, even in
the event of a panic. Implementing this nested drop affects codegen
(apparently?) and results in slower code.

Fixes #65970
2019-12-14 12:38:45 -05:00
bors
c8ea4ace92 Auto merge of #67136 - oli-obk:const_stability, r=Centril
Require stable/unstable annotations for the constness of all stable fns with a const modifier

r? @RalfJung @Centril

Every `#[stable]` const fn now needs either a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` attribute or a `#[rustc_const_stable]` attribute. You can't silently stabilize the constness of a function anymore.
2019-12-14 10:21:32 +00:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
48164f8a17
Rollup merge of #67235 - jonas-schievink:vecdeque-leak, r=KodrAus
VecDeque: drop remaining items on destructor panic

Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67232
2019-12-13 20:35:30 +01:00
Oliver Scherer
5e17e39881 Require stable/unstable annotations for the constness of all stable functions with a const modifier 2019-12-13 11:27:02 +01:00
Oliver Scherer
d75c7530f3 Reuse the staged_api feature for rustc_const_unstable 2019-12-13 11:27:01 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
87f3b16e0b
Rollup merge of #67243 - jonas-schievink:linkedlist-drop, r=KodrAus
LinkedList: drop remaining items when drop panics

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67235, but for `LinkedList`, which has the same issue.

I've also copied over the other drop-related tests from `VecDeque` since AFAICT `LinkedList` didn't have any.
2019-12-13 04:21:27 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
2ca7b7e539
Rollup merge of #66341 - crgl:vec-deque-extend, r=Amanieu
Match `VecDeque::extend` to `Vec::extend_desugared`

Currently, `VecDeque::extend` [does not reserve at all](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65069#discussion_r333166522). This implementation still runs a check every iteration of the loop, but should reallocate at most once for the common cases where the `size_hint` lower bound is exact. Further optimizations in the future could improve this for some common cases, but given the complexity of the `Vec::extend` implementation it's not immediately clear that this would be worthwhile.
2019-12-13 04:21:22 +01:00
Yuki Okushi
60ebeda94f
Rollup merge of #67238 - llogiq:moo-and-improved, r=Dylan-DPC
Small std::borrow::Cow improvements

This is a small set of improvements (+ one more tested code path) for `Cow`.
2019-12-12 10:09:28 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
9860a4eeb7
Rollup merge of #62514 - stephaneyfx:box-ffi, r=nikomatsakis
Clarify `Box<T>` representation and its use in FFI

This officializes what was only shown as a code example in [the unsafe code guidelines](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/layout/function-pointers.html?highlight=box#use) and follows [the discussion](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/157) in the corresponding repository.

It is also related to [the issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52976) regarding marking `Box<T>` `#[repr(transparent)]`.

If the statement this PR adds is incorrect or a more in-depth discussion is warranted, I apologize. Should it be the case, the example in the unsafe code guidelines should be amended and some document should make it clear that it is not sound/supported.
2019-12-12 10:09:15 +09:00
Jonas Schievink
82c09b75d7 Add comment to Dropper 2019-12-12 00:39:29 +01:00
Jonas Schievink
5e32da1849 LinkedList: drop remaining items when drop panics 2019-12-12 00:14:09 +01:00
Andre Bogus
2422797785 Small Cow improvements 2019-12-11 21:01:33 +01:00
Jonas Schievink
189ccf20a2 VecDeque: drop remaining items on destructor panic 2019-12-11 19:38:45 +01:00
Nicholas Matsakis
fafa489798 clarify that Box<T> should only be used when defined *in Rust* 2019-12-11 10:33:36 -05:00
Stephane Raux
cb1cc1181e Fix description based on review 2019-12-10 22:29:25 -08:00
Yuki Okushi
729c31b312
Rollup merge of #67180 - NieDzejkob:vec-doc-copied, r=Dylan-DPC
doc: Use .copied() instead of .cloned() in Vec example

None
2019-12-11 04:33:05 +09:00
Stephane Raux
1a26df7727 Remove trailing whitespace 2019-12-10 00:05:37 -08:00
Stephane Raux
fe6ddd5d15 Specify behavior when passed a null pointer 2019-12-09 23:20:49 -08:00
Stephane Raux
ead1159490 Use Niko's wording 2019-12-09 23:20:49 -08:00
Jakub Kądziołka
ecd930717b
doc: Use .copied() instead of .cloned() in Vec example 2019-12-09 19:48:18 +01:00
Ralf Jung
ca2ffe3a80 liballoc: ignore tests in Miri instead of removing them entirely 2019-12-07 12:42:19 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
bcf992dc6c
Rollup merge of #66710 - vorner:weak-into-raw-null-docs, r=dtolnay
weak-into-raw: Clarify some details in Safety

Clarify it is OK to pass a pointer that never owned a weak count (one
from Weak::new) back into it as it was created from it. Relates to
discussion in #60728.

@CAD97 Do you want to have a look at the new docs?
2019-12-05 19:03:08 +01:00
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
473151070b
weak-into-raw: Clarify some details in Safety
Clarify it is OK to pass a pointer that never owned a weak count (one
from Weak::new) back into it as it was created from it. Relates to
discussion in #60728.
2019-12-05 15:22:11 +01:00
bors
4787e97475 Auto merge of #66256 - CAD97:patch-2, r=RalfJung
Layout::pad_to_align is infallible

As per [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55724#issuecomment-441421651) (cc @glandium).

> Per eb981a1/src/libcore/alloc.rs (L63-L65), `layout.size()` is always <= `usize::MAX - (layout.align() - 1)`.
>
> Which means:
>
> * The maximum value `layout.size()` can have is already aligned for `layout.align()` (`layout.align()` being a power of two, `usize::MAX - (layout.align() - 1)` is a multiple of `layout.align()`)
> * Incidentally, any value smaller than that maximum value will align at most to that maximum value.
>
> IOW, `pad_to_align` can not return `Err(LayoutErr)`, except for the layout not respecting its invariants, but we shouldn't care about that.

This PR makes `pad_to_align` return `Layout` directly, representing the fact that it cannot fail.
2019-12-03 01:50:33 +00:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
3db3f156f1
Rollup merge of #66890 - dtolnay:fmt4, r=Dylan-DPC
Format liballoc with rustfmt

Same strategy as #66691 -- as with my previous formatting PRs, I am avoiding causing merge conflicts in other PRs by only touches those files that are not involved in any currently open PR. Files that appear in new PRs between when this PR is opened and when it makes it to the top of the bors queue will be reverted from this PR.

The list of files involved in open PRs is determined by querying GitHub's GraphQL API [with this script](https://gist.github.com/dtolnay/aa9c34993dc051a4f344d1b10e4487e8).

With the list of files from the script in outstanding_files, the relevant commands were:

```
$ find src/liballoc -name '*.rs' \
    | xargs rustfmt --edition=2018 --unstable-features --skip-children
$ rg liballoc outstanding_files | xargs git checkout --
```

To confirm no funny business:

```
$ git checkout $THIS_COMMIT^
$ git show --pretty= --name-only $THIS_COMMIT \
    | xargs rustfmt --edition=2018 --unstable-features --skip-children
$ git diff $THIS_COMMIT  # there should be no difference
```

r? @Dylan-DPC
2019-12-01 04:49:31 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
cb43d82fd6
Rollup merge of #66662 - RalfJung:miri-test-liballoc, r=dtolnay
Miri: run panic-catching tests in liballoc

I also converted two tests from using `thread::spawn(...).join()` just for catching panics, to `catch_panic`, so that Miri can run them.
2019-12-01 04:49:21 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
9ae7fb3e71
Rollup merge of #66759 - CAD97:patch-3, r=KodrAus
impl TrustedLen for vec::Drain

The iterator methods just forward to `slice::Iter`, which is `TrustedLen`.

This can probably be applied to other `Drain` structs as well.
2019-11-30 16:56:49 +01:00
David Tolnay
1c4d453969
Format liballoc with rustfmt 2019-11-29 20:25:07 -08:00
Tyler Mandry
999fd561ba
Rollup merge of #66798 - bwignall:typo, r=varkor
Fix spelling typos

Should be non-semantic.

Uses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/For_machines to find likely typos.
2019-11-27 15:28:53 -06:00
Tyler Mandry
a3a8ee0636
Rollup merge of #66744 - chrisduerr:master, r=Dylan-DPC
Fix shrink_to panic documentation

While the potential for panicking is already documented for the
`Vec::shrink_to` method, it is not clearly labeled with the usual
`# Panics` heading.

r? @steveklabnik
2019-11-27 15:28:44 -06:00
Brian Wignall
16fabd8efd Fix spelling typos 2019-11-26 22:19:54 -05:00
Tyler Mandry
941d915942
Rollup merge of #66128 - emilio:new-zeroed, r=SimonSapin
alloc: Add new_zeroed() versions like new_uninit().

MaybeUninit has both uninit() and zeroed(), it seems reasonable to have the same
surface on Box/Rc/Arc.

Needs tests.

cc #63291
2019-11-26 17:56:05 -06:00
Christopher Durham
f8a4b6d2ba
impl TrustedLen for vec::Drain 2019-11-25 17:55:26 -05:00
Christian Duerr
73b467da89
Fix shrink_to panic documentation
While the potential for panicking is already documented for the
`Vec::shrink_to` method, it is not clearly labeled with the usual
`# Panics` heading.
2019-11-25 15:49:40 +01:00
bors
b56b23988d Auto merge of #66393 - ssomers:hash_benches, r=dtolnay
introduce benchmarks of HashSet operations

To avoid goofs such as corrected by #66280, I added benchmarks of binary HashSet operations.

Due to the fact x.py keeps recompiling the whole shebang (or at least a big part of it) whenever you touch the test code, and because piling up all tests in one file does not strike me as future proof, I tried moving the hash benches to the separate place they are for liballoc/collections/btree. But it turns out that, in a cleaned checkout, x.py still recompiles the whole shebang whenever you touch the test code (PS or when you add or delete any irrelevant file). So I'm not going to add more tests, and I doubt others will, and these tests have proven their point already, so this PR is kind of pointless
2019-11-24 10:52:12 +00:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
d845e6fc8d
Rollup merge of #64856 - jonhoo:format-temporaries, r=sfackler
Scope format! temporaries

This places the temporaries that `format!` generates to refer to its arguments (through `&dyn Trait`) in a short-lived scope surrounding just the invocation of `format!`. This enables `format!` to be used in generators without the temporaries preventing the generator from being `Send` (due to `dyn Trait` not being `Sync`).

See rust-lang/rust#64477 for details.
2019-11-24 03:16:57 +01:00
Ralf Jung
a2299799e6 enable more panic-catching tests in Miri 2019-11-23 08:53:53 +01:00