implement detail_exit but I'm not sure it is right.
not create new file and write detail exit in lib.rs
replace std::process::exit to detail_exit
that is not related to code runnning.
remove pub
This has two benefits:
1. There is a clearer mental model of how bootstrap works. Steps correspond to paths on disk unless it's strictly impossible for them to do so (e.g. dist components).
2. Bootstrap has better checks for internal consistency. This caught several issues:
- `src/sanitizers` doesn't exist; I changed it to just be a `sanitizers` alias.
- `src/tools/lld` doesn't exist; I removed it, since `lld` alone already works.
- `src/llvm` doesn't exist; removed it since `llvm` and `src/llvm-project` both work.
- `src/lldb_batchmode.py` doesn't exist, it was moved to `src/etc`.
- `install` was still using `src/librustc` instead of `compiler/rustc`.
- None of the tools in `dist` / `install` allowed using `src/tools/X` to build them. This might be intentional - I can change them to aliases if you like.
The majority of the code is only used by either rustbuild or
rustc_llvm's build script. Rust_build is compiled once for rustbuild and
once for every stage. This means that the majority of the code in this
crate is needlessly compiled multiple times. By moving only the code
actually used by the respective crates to rustbuild and rustc_llvm's
build script, this needless duplicate compilation is avoided.
- Add rustfmt to `x.py check`
- Update Cargo.lock
- Remove rustfmt from the toolstate list
- Make rustfmt an in-tree tool
- Give an error on `x.py test rustfmt` if rustfmt fails to build or if tests fail
- Don't call `save_toolstate` when testing rustfmt
When we're running with dry_run enabled (i.e. all builds do this initially), we're
guaranteed to save of a toolstate of TestFail for tools that aren't tested. In practice,
we do test tools as well, so for those tools we would initially record them as being
TestPass, and then later on re-record the correct state after actually testing them.
However, this would not work well if the build failed for whatever reason (e.g. panicking
in bootstrap, or as was the case in 73097, clippy failing to test successfully), we would
just go on believing that things passed when they in practice did not.
This commit also adjusts saving toolstate to never record clippy explicitly (otherwise, it
would be recorded when building it); eventually that'll likely move to other tools as well
but not yet. This is deemed simpler than checking everywhere we generically save
toolstate.
We also move clippy out of the "toolstate" no-fail-fast build into a separate x.py
invocation; this should no longer be technically required but provides the nice state of
letting us check toolstate for all tools and only then check clippy (giving full results
on every build).
Turn off rustc-dev-guide toolstate for now
cc @rust-lang/wg-rustc-dev-guide @rust-lang/infra @ehuss
When we first added toolstate, the intent was to use toolstate to linkcheck PRs so that we would know which PRs break links in the guide (e.g. by moving some definition). However, these days, we are mostly getting 429 errors (too many requests) from github (not sure when this changed), and every day, there seems to be a spurious failure of some other sort. This is all despite efforts to filter out spurious failures.
Getting spurious gh pings is annoying, and we're not actually getting a lot out of this linkcheck beyond what we are getting with our CI on the guide's repo, so I'm proposing to disable this until we can figure out what might be a better path forward.
Toolstate publication only runs if the channel is "nightly" and
previously the toolstate builders did not know that the channel was
nightly (since they are not dist builders).
A look through bootstrap seems to indicate that nothing should directly
depend on the channel being set to `-dev` on the test builders, though
this may cause some problems with UI tests (if for some reason they're
dumping the channel into stderr), but we cannot find evidence of such so
hopefully this is fine.
This is not yet actually used by CI, but implements the logic for
checking that tools are properly building on beta/stable and during beta
cutoff week.
This attempts to mirror the checking functionality in
src/ci/docker/x86_64-gnu-tools/checktools.sh, and called scripts. It
does not attempt to run the relevant steps (that functionality was
originally desired to be moved into bootstrap as well, but doing so
proved more difficult than expected).
This is intended as a way to centralize and make clearer the logic
involved in toolstate checking. In particular, the previous logic was
spread across numerous python and shell scripts in such a way that made
interpretation quite difficult.
This reverts commit ab018c76e1.
This also adds the `ToolBuild::is_ext_tool` field to replace the previous
`ToolBuild::expectation` field, to indicate whether a build-failure of
certain tool is essential.
This commit enables configuring the RLS/rustfmt tools to the "broken" state and
actually get it past CI. The main changes here were to update all dist-related
code to handle the situation where the RLS isn't available. This in turn
involved a homegrown preprocessor-like-function to edit the configuration files
we pass to the various combined installer tools.
