NLL: sort diagnostics by span
Sorting the output diagnostics by span is a long planned revision to the NLL diagnostics that we hope will yield a less surprising user experience in some case.
Once we got them buffered, it was trivial to implement. (The hard part is skimming the resulting changes to the diagnostics to make sure nothing broke... Note that I largely rubber-stamped the `#[rustc_regions]` output change.)
Fix#51167
Fix wrong issue number in the test name
I made a mistake in previous PR #52620, second issue number was wrong, changing from #52133 to #52113
r? @kennytm
run-pass/const-endianness: negate before to_le()
`const LE_I128` needs parentheses to negate the value *before* calling
`to_le()`, otherwise it doesn't match the operations performed in the
black-boxed part of the test. This only makes a tangible difference on
big-endian targets.
Make the tool_lints actually usable
cc #44690
Necessary for rust-lang-nursery/rust-clippy#2955 and rust-lang-nursery/rust-clippy#2977
This PR makes it possible for lint tools (at the moment only for Clippy) to implement the `tool_lints`, like it was documented in #52018.
Because the `declare_lint` macro is pretty cluttered right now, there was not really a good way to add the `tool_name` as an additional argument of the macro. That's why I chose to introduce the new `declare_tool_lint` macro.
The switch from `&str` to `String` in the `lint_groups` `FxHashMap` is because I got weird error messages in the `check_lint_name` method. And the `by_name` field of the `LintStore` also uses `String`.
### What comes with this PR:
If this PR lands and Clippy switches to the `tool_lints`, the currently used methods
```rust
#[cfg_attr(feature = "cargo-clippy", allow(clippy_lint))]
#[allow(unknown_lints, clippy_lint)]
```
to `allow`/`warn`/`deny`/`forbid` Clippy lints, won't have any effects anymore, but also won't produce a warning. That is because the name of `clippy_lint` will then be `clippy::clippy_lint`. (Maybe we can add a clippy lint to search for `cfg_attr` appearances with the `cargo-clippy` feature?)
r? @oli-obk
[NLL] Don't make "fake" match variables mutable
These variables can't be mutated by the user, but since they have names the unused-mut lint thinks that it should check them.
rustc: Disallow machine applicability in foreign macros
Recent changes to lints disallowed lints from being emitted against code located
in foreign macros, except for future-incompatible lints. For a future
incompatible lint, however, the automatic suggestions may not be applicable!
This commit updates this code path to force all applicability suggestions made
to foreign macros to never be `MachineApplicable`. This should avoid rustfix
actually attempting fixing these suggestions, causing non-compiling code to be
produced.
Closesrust-lang/cargo#5799
It is not required for LLVM to have SPARC target support, so it is
necessary to only run this test when LLVM does support SPARC. Sadly, it
isn’t possible to specify exactly this constraint. Instead, we specify
that this test should run on SPARC host only (it surely is sane
assumption to make that compiler running on a SPARC can generate
SPARC, right?)
Since you cannot specify multiple `only-*` to have it run on both 32-bit
and 64-bit SPARC we pick 64-bit SPARC, because it is exactly what is
being tested by this test.
Fixes#52881
Previously linker diagnostic were being hidden when two modules were linked
together but failed to link. This commit fixes the situation by ensuring that we
have a diagnostic handler installed and also adds support for handling linker
diagnostics.
* Arguably this change is sometimes injecting noise into the output
(namely in the cases where the suggested rewrite is inline with the
suggestion and we end up highlighting the original source code).
I would not be opposed to something more aggressive/dynamic, like
revising the suggestion code to automatically print the original
source when necessary (e.g. when the error does not have a span
that includes the span of the suggestion).
* Also, as another note on this change: The doc comment for `Diagnostic::span_suggestion`
says:
/// The message
///
/// * should not end in any punctuation (a `:` is added automatically)
/// * should not be a question
/// * should not contain any parts like "the following", "as shown"
but the `:` is *not* added when the emitted line appears
out-of-line relative to the suggestion. I find that to be an
unfortunate UI experience.
----
As a drive-by fix, also changed code to combine multiple suggestions
for a pattern into a single multipart suggestion (which vastly
improves user experience IMO).
----
Includes the updates to expected NLL diagnostics.
`const LE_I128` needs parentheses to negate the value *before* calling
`to_le()`, otherwise it doesn't match the operations performed in the
black-boxed part of the test. This only makes a tangible difference on
big-endian targets.
Recent changes to lints disallowed lints from being emitted against code located
in foreign macros, except for future-incompatible lints. For a future
incompatible lint, however, the automatic suggestions may not be applicable!
This commit updates this code path to force all applicability suggestions made
to foreign macros to never be `MachineApplicable`. This should avoid rustfix
actually attempting fixing these suggestions, causing non-compiling code to be
produced.
Closesrust-lang/cargo#5799
Tweak the raw_identifiers lints in 2018
* Enable the `raw_identifiers` feature automatically in the 2018 preview
* Only emit lint warnings if the `raw_identifiers` feature is activated
cc rust-lang/cargo#5783
Add the -Zcrate-attr=foo unstable rustc option
This PR adds a new unstable option to `rustc`: `-Zcrate-attr=foo`. The option can be used to inject crate-level attributes from the CLI, and it's meant to be used by tools like Crater that needs to add their own attributes to a crate without changing the source code.
The exact reason I need this is to implement "edition runs" in Crater: we need to add the preview feature flag to every crate, and editing the crates' source code on the fly might produce unexpected results, while a compiler flag is more reliable.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/crater/issues/282 @Mark-Simulacrum
