refactor: merge error code `E0465` into `E0464`
`E0465` is an undocumented and untested error code that is functionally identical to `E0464`. This PR merges `E0465` into `E0464`, thus documenting and testing another error code (#61137).
r? `@GuillaumeGomez` (not sure if you want to review this but it's relevant to my other PRs that you have reviewed)
Revert "Implement allow-by-default `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` lint"
This is a clean revert of #105484.
I confirmed that reverting that PR fixes the regression reported in #106247. ~~I can't say I understand what this code is doing, but maybe it can be re-landed with a different implementation.~~ **Edit:** https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106247#issuecomment-1367174384 has an explanation of why #105484 ends up surfacing spurious `where_clause_object_safety` errors. The implementation of `where_clause_object_safety` assumes we only check whether a trait is object safe when somebody actually uses that trait with `dyn`. However the implementation of `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` added in the problematic PR involves checking *every* trait for whether it is object-safe.
FYI `@nbdd0121` `@compiler-errors`
CFI: Monomorphize transparent ADTs before typeid
Monomorphise `#[repr(transparent)]` parameterized ADTs before turning them into an Itanium mangled String.
`#[repr(transparent)]` ADTs currently use the single field to represent them in their CFI type ID to ensure that they are compatible. However, if that type involves a type parameter instantiated at the ADT level, as in `ManuallyDrop`, this will currently ICE as the `Parameter` type cannot be mangled. Since this happens at lowering time, it should always be concrete after substitution.
Fixes#106230
The test was minified from the published `msf-ice:0.2.1` crate which failed in a crater run.
A faulty compiler was triggering a `higher-ranked lifetime error`:
> could not prove `[async block@...]: Send`
Migrate more scraped examples CSS rules to CSS variables
It's based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106218 so it will need to wait for it to be merged first.
r? `@notriddle`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #104531 (Provide a better error and a suggestion for `Fn` traits with lifetime params)
- #105899 (`./x doc library --open` opens `std`)
- #106190 (Account for multiple multiline spans with empty padding)
- #106202 (Trim more paths in obligation types)
- #106234 (rustdoc: simplify settings, help, and copy button CSS by not reusing)
- #106236 (docs/test: add docs and a UI test for `E0514` and `E0519`)
- #106259 (Update Clippy)
- #106260 (Fix index out of bounds issues in rustdoc)
- #106263 (Formatter should not try to format non-Rust files)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Monomorphise `#[repr(transparent)]` parameterized ADTs before turning
them into an Itanium mangled String.
`#[repr(transparent)]` ADTs currently use the single field to represent
them in their CFI type ID to ensure that they are compatible. However,
if that type involves a type parameter instantiated at the ADT level, as
in `ManuallyDrop`, this will currently ICE as the `Parameter` type
cannot be mangled. Since this happens at lowering time, it should always
be concrete after substitution.
Fixes#106230
docs/test: add docs and a UI test for `E0514` and `E0519`
No UI test on `E0514`, it would need to compile with a different `rustc` version.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Provide a better error and a suggestion for `Fn` traits with lifetime params
Given `Fn`-family traits with lifetime params in trait bounds like `fn f(_: impl Fn<'a>(&'a str) -> bool)`, we currently produce many unhelpful errors.
This PR allows these situations to suggest simply using Higher-Rank Trait Bounds like `for<'a> Fn(&'a str) -> bool`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103490.
Make trait/impl `where` clause mismatch on region error a bit more actionable
Improve `where` clause suggestions for GATs/methods that have incompatible region predicates in their `where` clauses.
Also addresses this diagnostic that went away https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106129#discussion_r1056875772
Improve heuristics whether `format_args` string is a source literal
Previously, it only checked whether there was _a_ literal at the span of the first argument, not whether the literal actually matched up. This caused issues when a proc macro was generating a different literal with the same span.
This requires an annoying special case for literals ending in `\n` because otherwise `println` wouldn't give detailed diagnostics anymore which would be bad.
Fixes#106191
Currently, given `Fn`-family traits with lifetime params like
`Fn<'a>(&'a str) -> bool`, many unhelpful errors show up. These are a
bit confusing.
This commit allows these situations to suggest simply using
higher-ranked trait bounds like `for<'a> Fn(&'a str) -> bool`.
