Fix spacing and ordering of words in pretty printed Impl
Follow-up to #92238 fixing one of the FIXMEs.
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
($item:item) => {
stringify!($item)
};
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", repro!(impl<T> Struct<T> {}));
println!("{}", repro!(impl<T> const Trait for T {}));
}
```
Before: `impl <T> Struct<T> {}`
After: `impl<T> Struct<T> {}`
Before: `impl const <T> Trait for T {}` 😿
After: `impl<T> const Trait for T {}`
Delay remaining `span_bug`s in drop elaboration
This follows changes from #67967 and converts remaining `span_bug`s into
delayed bugs, since for const items drop elaboration might be executed
on a MIR which failed borrowck.
Fixes#81708.
Fixes#91816.
Some cleanups around check_argument_types
Split out in ways from my rebase/continuation of #71827
Commits are mostly self-explanatory and these changes should be fairly straightforward
Ignore flaky `panic-short-backtrace-windows-x86_64.rs` test for now
Mitigates (but does not fix) #92000.
It has been causing a lot of spurious test failures recently that slow
down the bors queue.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91587 (core::ops::unsize: improve docs for DispatchFromDyn)
- #91907 (Allow `_` as the length of array types and repeat expressions)
- #92515 (RustWrapper: adapt for an LLVM API change)
- #92516 (Do not use deprecated -Zsymbol-mangling-version in bootstrap)
- #92530 (Move `contains` method of Option and Result lower in docs)
- #92546 (Update books)
- #92551 (rename StackPopClean::None to Root)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Suggest single quotes when char expected, str provided
If a type mismatch occurs where a char is expected and a string literal is provided, suggest changing the double quotes to single quotes.
We already provide this suggestion in the other direction ( ' -> " ).
Especially useful for new rust devs used to a language in which single/double quotes are interchangeable.
Fixes#92479.
Consolidate Result's and Option's methods into fewer impl blocks
`Result`'s and `Option`'s methods have historically been separated up into `impl` blocks based on their trait bounds, with the bounds specified on type parameters of the impl block. I find this unhelpful because closely related methods, like `unwrap_or` and `unwrap_or_default`, end up disproportionately far apart in source code and rustdocs:
<pre>
impl<T> Option<T> {
pub fn unwrap_or(self, default: T) -> T {
...
}
<img alt="one eternity later" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1940490/147780325-ad4e01a4-c971-436e-bdf4-e755f2d35f15.jpg" width="750">
}
impl<T: Default> Option<T> {
pub fn unwrap_or_default(self) -> T {
...
}
}
</pre>
I'd prefer for method to be in as few impl blocks as possible, with the most logical grouping within each impl block. Any bounds needed can be written as `where` clauses on the method instead:
```rust
impl<T> Option<T> {
pub fn unwrap_or(self, default: T) -> T {
...
}
pub fn unwrap_or_default(self) -> T
where
T: Default,
{
...
}
}
```
*Warning: the end-to-end diff of this PR is computed confusingly by git / rendered confusingly by GitHub; it's practically impossible to review that way. I've broken the PR into commits that move small groups of methods for which git behaves better — these each should be easily individually reviewable.*
Move `PatKind::Lit` checking from ast_validation to ast lowering
Fixes#92074
This allows us to insert an `ExprKind::Err` when an invalid expression
is used in a literal pattern, preventing later stages of compilation
from seeing an unexpected literal pattern.
Stabilize -Z symbol-mangling-version=v0 as -C symbol-mangling-version=v0
This allows selecting `v0` symbol-mangling without an unstable option. Selecting `legacy` still requires -Z unstable-options.
This does not change the default symbol-mangling-version. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89917 for a pull request changing the default. Rationale, from #89917:
Rust's current mangling scheme depends on compiler internals; loses information about generic parameters (and other things) which makes for a worse experience when using external tools that need to interact with Rust symbol names; is inconsistent; and can contain . characters which aren't universally supported. Therefore, Rust has defined its own symbol mangling scheme which is defined in terms of the Rust language, not the compiler implementation; encodes information about generic parameters in a reversible way; has a consistent definition; and generates symbols that only use the characters A-Z, a-z, 0-9, and _.
Support for the new Rust symbol mangling scheme has been added to upstream tools that will need to interact with Rust symbols (e.g. debuggers).
This pull request allows enabling the new v0 symbol-mangling-version.
See #89917 for references to the implementation of v0, and for references to the tool changes to decode Rust symbols.
Support [x; n] expressions in concat_bytes!
Currently trying to use `concat_bytes!` with a repeating array value like `[42; 5]` results in an error:
```
error: expected a byte literal
--> src/main.rs:3:27
|
3 | let x = concat_bytes!([3; 4]);
| ^^^^^^
|
= note: only byte literals (like `b"foo"`, `b's'`, and `[3, 4, 5]`) can be passed to `concat_bytes!()`
```
This makes it so repeating array syntax can be used the same way normal arrays can be. The RFC doesn't explicitly mention repeat expressions, but it seems reasonable to allow them as well, since normal arrays are allowed.
It is possible to make the compiler get stuck compiling forever with `concat_bytes!([3; 999999999])`, but I don't think that's much of an issue since you can do that already with `const X: [u8; 999999999] = [3; 999999999];`.
Contributes to #87555.
Remove effect of `#[no_link]` attribute on name resolution
Previously it hid all non-macro names from other crates.
This has no relation to linking and can change name resolution behavior in some cases (e.g. glob conflicts), in addition to just producing the "unresolved name" errors.
I can kind of understand the possible reasoning behind the current behavior - if you can use names from a `no_link` crates then you can use, for example, functions too, but whether it will actually work or produce link-time errors will depend on random factors like inliner behavior.
(^^^ This is not the actual reason why the current behavior exist, I've looked through git history and it's mostly accidental.)
I think this risk is ok for such an obscure attribute, and we don't need to specifically prevent use of non-macro items from such crates.
(I'm not actually sure why would anyone use `#[no_link]` on a crate, even if it's macro only, if you aware of any use cases, please share. IIRC, at some point it was used for crates implementing custom derives - the now removed legacy ones, not the current proc macros.)
Extracted from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91795.
Emit an error for `--cfg=)`
Fixes#73026
See also: #64467, #89468
The issue stems from a `FatalError` being silently raised in
`panictry_buffer`. Normally this is not a problem, because
`panictry_buffer` emits the causes of the error, but they are not
themselves fatal, so they get filtered out by the silent emitter.
To fix this, we use a parser entrypoint which doesn't use
`panictry_buffer`, and we handle the error ourselves.
Fixes#92074
This allows us to insert an `ExprKind::Err` when an invalid expression
is used in a literal pattern, preventing later stages of compilation
from seeing an unexpected literal pattern.
[rustc_builtin_macros] add indices to format_foreign::printf::Substitution::Escape
Fixes#92267.
The problem was that the escape string "%%" does not need to appear at the very beginning of the format string, but
the iterator implementation assumed that it did.
The solution follows the pattern used by `format_foregin:🐚:Subtitution::Escape`: 8ed935e92d/compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/format_foreign.rs (L629)
Fix whitespace in pretty printed PatKind::Range
Follow-up to #92238 fixing one of the FIXMEs.
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
($pat:pat) => {
stringify!($pat)
};
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", repro!(0..=1));
}
```
Before: `0 ..=1`
After: `0..=1`
The canonical spacing applied by rustfmt has no space after the lower expr. Rustc's parser diagnostics also do not put a space there:
df96fb166f/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/pat.rs (L754)
Fixes#73026
See also: #64467, #89468
The issue stems from a `FatalError` being silently raised in
`panictry_buffer`. Normally this is not a problem, because
`panictry_buffer` emits the causes of the error, but they are not
themselves fatal, so they get filtered out by the silent emitter.
To fix this, we use a parser entrypoint which doesn't use
`panictry_buffer`, and we handle the error ourselves.
Refactor variance diagnostics to work with more types
Instead of special-casing mutable pointers/references, we
now support general generic types (currently, we handle
`ty::Ref`, `ty::RawPtr`, and `ty::Adt`)
When a `ty::Adt` is involved, we show an additional note
explaining which of the type's generic parameters is
invariant (e.g. the `T` in `Cell<T>`). Currently, we don't
explain *why* a particular generic parameter ends up becoming
invariant. In the general case, this could require printing
a long 'backtrace' of types, so doing this would be
more suitable for a follow-up PR.
We still only handle the case where our variance switches
to `ty::Invariant`.
Instead of special-casing mutable pointers/references, we
now support general generic types (currently, we handle
`ty::Ref`, `ty::RawPtr`, and `ty::Adt`)
When a `ty::Adt` is involved, we show an additional note
explaining which of the type's generic parameters is
invariant (e.g. the `T` in `Cell<T>`). Currently, we don't
explain *why* a particular generic parameter ends up becoming
invariant. In the general case, this could require printing
a long 'backtrace' of types, so doing this would be
more suitable for a follow-up PR.
We still only handle the case where our variance switches
to `ty::Invariant`.
Add codegen option for branch protection and pointer authentication on AArch64
The branch-protection codegen option enables the use of hint-space pointer
authentication code for AArch64 targets.
