Remove extern "wasm" ABI
Remove the unstable `extern "wasm"` ABI (`wasm_abi` feature tracked in #83788).
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513#issuecomment-2220410679 and following, this ABI is a failed experiment that did not end up being used for anything. Keeping support for this ABI in LLVM 19 would require us to switch wasm targets to the `experimental-mv` ABI, which we do not want to do.
It should be noted that `Abi::Wasm` was internally used for two things: The `-Z wasm-c-abi=legacy` ABI that is still used by default on some wasm targets, and the `extern "wasm"` ABI. Despite both being `Abi::Wasm` internally, they were not the same. An explicit `extern "wasm"` additionally enabled the `+multivalue` feature.
I've opted to remove `Abi::Wasm` in this patch entirely, instead of keeping it as an ABI with only internal usage. Both `-Z wasm-c-abi` variants are now treated as part of the normal C ABI, just with different different treatment in
adjust_for_foreign_abi.
Remove the unstable `extern "wasm"` ABI (`wasm_abi` feature tracked
in #83788).
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513#issuecomment-2220410679
and following, this ABI is a failed experiment that did not end
up being used for anything. Keeping support for this ABI in LLVM 19
would require us to switch wasm targets to the `experimental-mv`
ABI, which we do not want to do.
It should be noted that `Abi::Wasm` was internally used for two
things: The `-Z wasm-c-abi=legacy` ABI that is still used by
default on some wasm targets, and the `extern "wasm"` ABI. Despite
both being `Abi::Wasm` internally, they were not the same. An
explicit `extern "wasm"` additionally enabled the `+multivalue`
feature.
I've opted to remove `Abi::Wasm` in this patch entirely, instead
of keeping it as an ABI with only internal usage. Both
`-Z wasm-c-abi` variants are now treated as part of the normal
C ABI, just with different different treatment in
adjust_for_foreign_abi.
Migrate `issue-83112-incr-test-moved-file`, `type-mismatch-same-crate-name` and `issue-109934-lto-debuginfo` `run-make` tests to rmake or ui
Part of #121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
I have noticed that the new UI test `debuginfo-lto-alloc` is outputting artifacts that aren't getting cleaned up because of its `-C incremental`. That might be the justification needed to keep it as a run-make test?
Try it on:
// try-job: test-various // previously passed
try-job: armhf-gnu
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc
Migrate `extern-flag-pathless`, `silly-file-names`, `metadata-dep-info`, `cdylib-fewer-symbols` and `symbols-include-type-name` `run-make` tests to rmake
Part of #121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
`cdylib-fewer-symbols` demands a Windows try-job. (Almost guaranteed to fail, but 7 years is a long time)
try-job: x86_64-gnu-distcheck
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: aarch64-apple
Migrate `pass-linker-flags-flavor`, `pass-linker-flags-from-dep` and `pass-linker-flags` `run-make` tests to rmake
Part of #121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
Please test on i686-msvc. Expected to fail.
try-job: aarch64-apple
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #127092 (Change return-type-notation to use `(..)`)
- #127184 (More refactorings to rustc_interface)
- #127190 (Update LLVM submodule)
- #127253 (Fix incorrect suggestion for extra argument with a type error)
- #127280 (Disable rmake test rustdoc-io-error on riscv64gc-gnu)
- #127294 (Less magic number for corountine)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Disable rmake test rustdoc-io-error on riscv64gc-gnu
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126917 we disabled `inaccessible-temp-dir` on `riscv64gc-gnu` because the container runs the build as `root` (just like the `armhf-gnu` builds). Tests creating an inaccessible test directory are not possible, since `root` can always touch those directories.
553a69030e/src/ci/docker/host-x86_64/disabled/riscv64gc-gnu/Dockerfile (L99)
This means the tests are run as `root`. As `root`, it's perfectly normal and reasonable to violate permission checks this way:
```bash
$ sudo mkdir scratch
$ sudo chmod o-w scratch
$ sudo mkdir scratch/backs
$
```
Because of this, this PR makes the test ignored on `riscv64gc` (just like on `armhf-gnu`) for now.
As an alternative, I believe the best long-term strategy would be to not run the tests as `root` for this job. Some preliminary exploration was done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126917#issuecomment-2189933970, however that appears a larger lift.
## Testing
> [!NOTE]
> `riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu` is a [**Tier 2 with Host Tools** platform](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/rustc/platform-support.html), all tests may not necessarily pass! This change should only ignore `inaccessible-temp-dir` and not affect other tests.
You can test out the job locally:
```sh
DEPLOY=1 ./src/ci/docker/run.sh riscv64gc-gnu
```
r? `@jieyouxu`
