This commit supplies a real fix, which makes retags more complicated, at the benefit of
making accesses more performant.
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
compiletest: explain that UI tests are expected not to compile by default
```
error: ui test compiled successfully!
```
is not a very useful message for someone new to the test suite, so change the wording and add a note to explain
Update wasm-component-ld to 0.5.11
This pulls in an update that supports ``@`-files` used to pass arguments to linkers to fix invocations on Windows that are large.
Closes#133649
improve TagEncoding::Niche docs, sanity check, and UB checks
Turns out the `niche_variants` range can actually contain the `untagged_variant`. We should report this as UB in Miri, so this PR implements that.
Also rename `partially_check_layout` to `layout_sanity_check` for better consistency with how similar functions are called in other parts of the compiler.
Turns out my adjustments to the transmutation logic also fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126267.
Gate async fn trait bound modifier on `async_trait_bounds`
This PR moves `async Fn()` trait bounds into a new feature gate: `feature(async_trait_bounds)`. The general vibe is that we will most likely stabilize the `feature(async_closure)` *without* the `async Fn()` trait bound modifier, so we need to gate that separately.
We're trying to work on the general vision of `async` trait bound modifier general in: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3710, however that RFC still needs more time for consensus to converge, and we've decided that the value that users get from calling the bound `async Fn()` is *not really* worth blocking landing async closures in general.
switch `jemalloc-sys` back to `tikv-jemalloc-sys`, and update to 0.6.0
Some context:
- we used to use jemalloc bindings from https://github.com/gnzlbg/jemallocator, since #55238
- that crate was abandoned, picked up as a fork in https://github.com/tikv/jemallocator, so we switched to that in #83152.
- then they were able to publish to the original `jemalloc-sys` bindings crate, and `jemalloc-sys` and `tikv-jemalloc-sys` became the same thing -- so I switched back to the OG crate in #96790
- they're now having publishing problems again: I've been waiting for https://github.com/tikv/jemallocator/pull/96 for the `jemalloc-sys` 0.6.0 update for a few months, but `tikv-jemalloc-sys` is already updated to 0.6.0.
A perf run showed some improvements, so this PR switches back to `tikv-jemalloc-sys` to update to 0.6.0.
Unify `sysroot_target_{bin,lib}dir` handling
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131405#discussion_r1826558962 where `sysroot_target_bindir` had to do some dancing because the sysroot ensure logic embedded in `sysroot_target_libdir` returned `$sysroot/$relative_lib/rustlib/$target/lib` and not the `rustlib` parent `$sysroot/$relative_lib/rustlib/`.
This PR pulls out the sysroot ensure logic into a helper, and return `$sysroot/$relative_lib/rustlib/` instead so `sysroot_target_bindir` doesn't have to do parent traversal from the path returned from `sysroot_target_libdir`, and also make them easier to follow in that they are now clearly closely related based on the common target sysroot ensure logic.
Change `AttrArgs::Eq` to a struct variant
Cleanups for simplifying https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131808
Basically changes `AttrArgs::Eq` to a struct variant and then avoids several matches on `AttrArgsEq` in favor of methods on it. This will make future refactorings simpler, as they can either keep methods or switch to field accesses without having to restructure code
Reducing `target_feature` check-cfg merge conflicts
It was rightfully pointed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099#discussion_r1862490542 that the expected values for the `target_feature` cfg are regularly updated and unfortunately the check-cfg tests for it are very merge-conflict prone.
This PR aims at drastically reducing the likely-hood of those, by normalizing the "and X more" diagnostic, as well as making the full expected list multi-line instead of being on a single one.
cc `@RalfJung`
r? `@jieyouxu`
add "profiler" and "optimized-compiler-builtins" option coverage for ci-rustc
Adds "profiler" and "optimized-compiler-builtins" option coverage in CI-rustc config compatibility check.
Resolves#133675
Use c"lit" for CStrings without unwrap
I've reviewed uses of `CString::new("lit")`.
Some could be changed to `c"lit"`. Some could be changed to `c"lit".to_owned()`, avoiding an `unwrap()`.
Many `CString` documentation examples could be simplified. I deliberately haven't changed all the examples to use the exact same expression, so that they can demonstrate many ways of creating `CString`s.
I've left UI tests mostly unchanged, because `c""` requires edition 2021, but most UI tests use 2015, and I didn't want to accidentally change what the tests are testing.
build `rustc` with 1 CGU on `aarch64-apple-darwin`
Distribute `aarch64-apple-darwin` artifacts built with `rust.codegen-units=1`, like we already do on Linux/Windows/macOS Intel.
1. Performance results (only wall-time on mac as usual)
- I only did some `ripgrep` check builds (the revision from rustc-perf), because we had noticeable wins in wall-time there back then on linux. It's a ~2-4% (mostly 3%) improvement on local builds.
```console
Benchmark 1: cargo +caa81728c3 check -q
Time (mean ± σ): 5.800 s ± 0.087 s [User: 16.048 s, System: 2.294 s]
Range (min … max): 5.725 s … 6.028 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q
Time (mean ± σ): 5.551 s ± 0.037 s [User: 15.451 s, System: 2.252 s]
Range (min … max): 5.477 s … 5.602 s 10 runs
Summary
'cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q' ran
1.04 ± 0.02 times faster than 'cargo +caa81728c3 check -q'
```
```console
Benchmark 1: CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +caa81728c3 check -q
Time (mean ± σ): 5.743 s ± 0.030 s [User: 16.005 s, System: 2.249 s]
Range (min … max): 5.720 s … 5.792 s 5 runs
Benchmark 2: CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q
Time (mean ± σ): 5.469 s ± 0.055 s [User: 15.244 s, System: 2.110 s]
Range (min … max): 5.404 s … 5.524 s 5 runs
Summary
'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q' ran
1.05 ± 0.01 times faster than 'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +caa81728c3 check -q'
```
```console
Benchmark 1: CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +caa81728c3 check -q -j1
Time (mean ± σ): 15.092 s ± 0.049 s [User: 11.969 s, System: 1.665 s]
Range (min … max): 15.052 s … 15.165 s 5 runs
Benchmark 2: CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q -j1
Time (mean ± σ): 14.623 s ± 0.035 s [User: 11.520 s, System: 1.619 s]
Range (min … max): 14.593 s … 14.682 s 5 runs
Summary
'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q -j1' ran
1.03 ± 0.00 times faster than 'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +caa81728c3 check -q -j1'
```
2. Effects on code size on `aarch64-apple-darwin`: it's a 13.24% reduction on `librustc_driver.dylib`
- [before](https://ci-artifacts.rust-lang.org/rustc-builds/caa81728c37f5ccfa9a0979574b9272a67f8a286/rustc-nightly-aarch64-apple-darwin.tar.xz): 173452888 (57.3 MB compressed).
- [after](https://ci-artifacts.rust-lang.org/rustc-builds/41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70/rustc-nightly-aarch64-apple-darwin.tar.xz): 150471368 (55.2 MB compressed, -3.7% here).
3. Effects on CI
- the [1st try build](https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/actions/runs/12118946198/job/33784512526) took 1h31
- the [2nd try build](https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/actions/runs/12121452825/job/33792429553) took 1h28
- I don't know how long the builder usually takes
remove `Ty::is_copy_modulo_regions`
Using these functions is likely incorrect if an `InferCtxt` is available, I moved this function to `TyCtxt` (and added it to `LateContext`) and added a note to the documentation that one should prefer `Infer::type_is_copy_modulo_regions` instead.
I didn't yet move `is_sized` and `is_freeze`, though I think we should move these as well.
r? `@compiler-errors` cc #132279
Add `needs-target-has-atomic` directive
Before this PR, the test writer has to specify platforms and architectures by hand for targets that have differing atomic width support. `#[cfg(target_has_atomic="...")]` is not quite the same because (1) you may have to specify additional matchers manually which has to be maintained individually, and (2) the `#[cfg]` blocks does not communicate to compiletest that a test would be ignored for a given target.
This PR implements a `//@ needs-target-has-atomic` directive which admits a comma-separated list of required atomic widths that the target must satisfy in order for the test to run.
```
//@ needs-target-has-atomic: 8, 16, ptr
```
See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87377>.
This PR supersedes #133095 and is co-authored by `@kei519,` because it was somewhat subtle, and it turned out easier to implement than to review.
rustc-dev-guide docs PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/2154
Remove `//@ compare-output-lines-by-subset`
There was only ever one test which used this flag, and it was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132244. I think this is a bad flag that should never have been added; comparing by subset makes the test failures extremely hard to debug. Any test that needs complicated output filtering like this should just use run-make instead.
Note that this does not remove the underlying comparison code, because it's still used if `runner` is set. I don't quite understand what's going on there, but since we still test on other platforms and in CI that the full output is accurate, I think it will be easier to debug than a test that uses compare-by-subset unconditionally.
rustc-dev-guide update PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/2151
rustdoc-json: Include safety of `static`s
`static`s in an `extern` block can have an associated safety annotation ["because there is nothing guaranteeing that the bit pattern at the static’s memory is valid for the type it is declared with"](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/external-blocks.html#statics). Rustdoc already knows this and displays in for HTML. This PR also includes it in JSON.
Inspired by https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/issues/975 which needs this, but it's probably useful in other places.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez.` Possibly easier to review commit-by-commit.
Eliminate magic numbers from expression precedence
Context: see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133140.
This PR continues on backporting Syn's expression precedence design into rustc. Rustc's design used mysterious integer quantities represented variously as `i8` or `usize` (e.g. `PREC_CLOSURE = -40i8`), a special significance around `0` that is never named, and an extra `PREC_FORCE_PAREN` precedence level that does not correspond to any expression. Syn's design uses a C-like enum with variants that clearly correspond to specific sets of expression kinds.
This PR is a refactoring that has no intended behavior change on its own, but it unblocks other precedence work that rustc's precedence design was poorly suited to accommodate.
- Asymmetrical precedence, so that a pretty-printer can tell `(return 1) + 1` needs parens but `1 + return 1` does not.
- Squashing the `Closure` and `Jump` cases into a single precedence level.
- Numerous remaining false positives and false negatives in rustc pretty-printer's parenthesization of macro metavariables, for example in `$e < rhs` where $e is `lhs as Thing<T>`.
FYI `@fmease` — you don't need to review if rustbot picks someone else, but you mentioned being interested in the followup PRs.
Before this commit, the test writer has to specify platforms and
architectures by hand for targets that have differing atomic width
support. `#[cfg(target_has_atomic)]` is not quite the same because (1)
you may have to specify additional matchers manually which has to be
maintained individually, and (2) the `#[cfg]` blocks does not
communicate to compiletest that a test would be ignored for a given
target.
This commit implements a `//@ needs-target-has-atomic` directive which
admits a comma-separated list of required atomic widths that the target
must satisfy in order for the test to run.
```
//@ needs-target-has-atomic: 8, 16, ptr
```
See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87377>.
Co-authored-by: kei519 <masaki.keigo.q00@kyoto-u.jp>
