This prevents the included test case from getting at nightly-only
features when run on stable. The harness builds with
RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP, but the bundle doesn't.
(cherry picked from commit 9cf531d26f)
Most of these are meant to test possible future improvements, but since
they cover cases the existing test suite didn't, I figure including them
now may be helpful.
(cherry picked from commit f1e4d94fa4)
This aligns the main error message a bit more with the phrasing in the
Edition Guide and provides a bit more information on the labels to
(hopefully!) aid in understanding.
(cherry picked from commit bdc6c4d07b)
Revert most of #133194 (except the test and the comment fixes). Then refix
not emitting locations at all when the correct location discriminator value
exceeds LLVM's capacity.
(cherry picked from commit 45ef92731b)
When `-Cstrip` was changed to use the bundled rust-objcopy instead of
/usr/bin/strip on OSX, strip-like arguments were preserved.
But strip and objcopy are, while being the same binary, different, they
have different defaults depending on which binary they are.
Notably, strip strips everything by default, and objcopy doesn't strip
anything by default.
Additionally, `-S` actually means `--strip-all`, so debuginfo stripped
everything and symbols didn't strip anything.
We now correctly pass `--strip-debug` and `--strip-all`.
taint fcx on selection errors during unsizing
With `feature(dyn_compatible_for_dispatch)` we only check for dyn-compatibility by checking the `T: Unsize<dyn Trait>` predicate during the unsizing coercions checks. If the predicate doesn't hold, we emit an error, but pretend the coercion succeeded to prevent further errors. To prevent const eval from attempting to actually perform this coercion, we need to taint the fcx after reporting the trait errors in the coercion check.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135021
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130521
Move some things to `std::sync::poison` and reexport them in `std::sync`
Tracking issue: #134646
r? `@tgross35`
I've used `sync_poison_mod` feature flag instead, because `sync_poison` had already been used back in 1.2.
try-job: x86_64-msvc
Try to write the panic message with a single `write_all` call
This writes the panic message to a buffer before writing to stderr. This allows it to be printed with a single `write_all` call, preventing it from being interleaved with other outputs. It also adds newlines before and after the message ensuring that only the panic message will have its own lines.
Before:
```
thread 'thread 'thread 'thread 'thread '<unnamed>thread 'thread 'thread 'thread '<unnamed><unnamed>thread '<unnamed>' panicked at ' panicked at <unnamed><unnamed><unnamed><unnamed><unnamed>' panicked at <unnamed>' panicked at src\heap.rssrc\heap.rs'
panicked at ' panicked at ' panicked at ' panicked at ' panicked at src\heap.rs' panicked at src\heap.rs::src\heap.rssrc\heap.rssrc\heap.rssrc\heap.rssrc\heap.rs:src\heap.rs:455455:::::455:455::455455455455455:455:99:::::9:9:
:
999:
999:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size:
:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size:
:
:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_sizeassertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_sizeassertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_sizeassertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_sizeerror: process didn't exit successfully: `target\debug\direct_test.exe` (exit code: 0xc0000409, STATUS_STACK_BUFFER_OVERRUN)
```
After:
```
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src\heap.rs:455:9:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src\heap.rs:455:9:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src\heap.rs:455:9:
assertion failed: size <= (*queue).block_size
error: process didn't exit successfully: `target\debug\direct_test.exe` (exit code: 0xc0000409, STATUS_STACK_BUFFER_OVERRUN)
```
---
try-jobs: x86_64-gnu-llvm-18
Provide structured suggestion for `impl Default` of type where all fields have defaults
```
error: `Default` impl doesn't use the declared default field values
--> $DIR/manual-default-impl-could-be-derived.rs:28:1
|
LL | / impl Default for B {
LL | | fn default() -> Self {
LL | | B {
LL | | x: s(),
| | --- this field has a default value
LL | | y: 0,
| | - this field has a default value
... |
LL | | }
| |_^
|
help: to avoid divergence in behavior between `Struct { .. }` and `<Struct as Default>::default()`, derive the `Default`
|
LL ~ #[derive(Default)] struct B {
|
```
Note that above the structured suggestion also includes completely removing the manual `impl`, but the rendering doesn't.
Some small nits to the borrowck suggestions for mutating a map through index
1. Suggesting users to either use `.insert` or `.get_mut` (which do totally different things) can be a bit of a footgun, so let's make that a bit more nuanced.
2. I find the suggestion of `.get_mut(|val| { *val = whatever; })` to be a bit awkward. I changed this to be an if-let instead.
3. Fix a bug which was suppressing the structured suggestion for some mutations via the index operator on `HashMap`/`BTreeMap`.
r? estebank or reassign
E0277: suggest dereferencing function arguments in more cases
This unifies and generalizes some of the logic in `TypeErrCtxt::suggest_dereferences` so that it will suggest dereferencing arguments to function/method calls in order to satisfy trait bounds in more cases.
Previously it would only fire on reference types, and it had two separate cases (one specifically to get through custom `Deref` impls when passing by-reference, and one specifically to catch #87437). I've based the new checks loosely on what's done for `E0308` in `FnCtxt::suggest_deref_or_ref`: it will suggest dereferences to satisfy trait bounds whenever the referent is `Copy`, is boxed (& so can be moved out of the boxes), or is being passed by reference.
This doesn't make the suggestion fire in contexts other than function arguments or binary operators (which are in a separate case that this doesn't touch), and doesn't make it suggest a combination of `&`-removal and dereferences. Those would require a bit more restructuring, so I figured just doing this would be a decent first step.
Closes#90997
