Detect more `cfg`d out items in resolution errors
Use a visitor to collect *all* items (including those nested) that were stripped behind a `cfg` condition.
```
error[E0425]: cannot find function `f` in this scope
--> $DIR/nested-cfg-attrs.rs:4:13
|
LL | fn main() { f() }
| ^ not found in this scope
|
note: found an item that was configured out
--> $DIR/nested-cfg-attrs.rs:2:4
|
LL | fn f() {}
| ^
note: the item is gated here
--> $DIR/nested-cfg-attrs.rs:1:35
|
LL | #[cfg_attr(all(), cfg_attr(all(), cfg(FALSE)))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^
```
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: could not find `doesnt_exist` in `inner`
--> $DIR/diagnostics-cross-crate.rs:18:23
|
LL | cfged_out::inner::doesnt_exist::hello();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ could not find `doesnt_exist` in `inner`
|
note: found an item that was configured out
--> $DIR/auxiliary/cfged_out.rs:6:13
|
LL | #[cfg(false)]
| ----- the item is gated here
LL | pub mod doesnt_exist {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Use a visitor to collect *all* items (including those nested) that were stripped behind a `cfg` condition.
```
error[E0425]: cannot find function `f` in this scope
--> $DIR/nested-cfg-attrs.rs:4:13
|
LL | fn main() { f() }
| ^ not found in this scope
|
note: found an item that was configured out
--> $DIR/nested-cfg-attrs.rs:2:4
|
LL | fn f() {}
| ^
note: the item is gated here
--> $DIR/nested-cfg-attrs.rs:1:35
|
LL | #[cfg_attr(all(), cfg_attr(all(), cfg(FALSE)))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^
```
Remove the witness type from coroutine *args* (without actually removing the type)
This does as much of rust-lang/rust#144157 as we can without having to break rust-lang/rust#143545 and/or introduce some better way of handling higher ranked assumptions.
Namely, it:
* Stalls coroutines based off of the *coroutine* type rather than the witness type.
* Reworks the dtorck constraint hack to not rely on the witness type.
* Removes the witness type from the args of the coroutine, eagerly creating the type for nested obligations when needed (auto/clone impls).
I'll experiment with actually removing the witness type in a follow-up.
r? lcnr
`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [2/N]
Some `tests/ui/issues/` housekeeping, to trim down number of tests directly under `tests/ui/issues/`. Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133895.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
Extend `is_case_difference` to handle digit-letter confusables
This PR extends `is_case_difference` to handle digit-letter confusables
Add support for detecting 0/O, 1/l, 5/S, 8/B, 9/g confusables in error suggestions.
r? `@estebank`
Consider operator's span when computing binop expr span
When computing the span of a binop consisting of `lhs` and `rhs`, we previously just took the spans of `lhs.span.to(rhs.span)`. In the case that both `lhs` and `rhs` are both arguments to a macro, this can produce a wildly incorrect span.
To fix this, first compute the span between `lhs` and the binary operator, which will cause `lhs` to possibly be adjusted to a relevant macro metavar, and then compute that span extended to `rhs`, which will cause it to also be adjusted to a relevant macro metavar.
This coincidentally fixes a FIXME in `tests/ui/lint/wide_pointer_comparisons.rs` and suppresses a nonsense suggestion.
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#144657 (fix: Only "close the window" when its the last annotated file)
- rust-lang/rust#144665 (Re-block SRoA on SIMD types)
- rust-lang/rust#144713 (`rustc_middle::ty` cleanups)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fix: Only "close the window" when its the last annotated file
While comparing the Unicode theme output of `rustc` and `annotate-snippets`, I found that `rustc` would ["close the window"](686bc1c5f9/compiler/rustc_errors/src/emitter.rs (L1025-L1027)) (draw a `╰╴`), even though there were other annotated files that followed the current one. This PR makes it so the emitter will only "close the window" on the last annotated file.
Before:
```
error[E0624]: method `method` is private
╭▸ $DIR/close_window.rs:9:7
│
LL │ s.method();
╰╴ ━━━━━━ private method
│
⸬ $DIR/auxiliary/close_window.rs:3:5
│
LL │ fn method(&self) {}
╰╴ ──────────────── private method defined here
```
After:
```
error[E0624]: method `method` is private
╭▸ $DIR/close_window.rs:9:7
│
LL │ s.method();
│ ━━━━━━ private method
│
⸬ $DIR/auxiliary/close_window.rs:3:5
│
LL │ fn method(&self) {}
╰╴ ──────────────── private method defined here
```
Implement support for `become` and explicit tail call codegen for the LLVM backend
This PR implements codegen of explicit tail calls via `become` in `rustc_codegen_ssa` and support within the LLVM backend. Completes a task on (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112788). This PR implements all the necessary bits to make explicit tail calls usable, other backends have received stubs for now and will ICE if you use `become` on them. I suspect there is some bikeshedding to be done on how we should go about implementing this for other backends, but it should be relatively straightforward for GCC after this is merged.
During development I also put together a POC bytecode VM based on tail call dispatch to test these changes out and analyze the codegen to make sure it generates expected assembly. That is available [here](https://github.com/xacrimon/tcvm).
Fix Box allocator drop elaboration
New version of rust-lang/rust#131146.
Clearing Box's drop flag after running its destructor can cause it to skip dropping its allocator, so just don't. Its cleared by the drop ladder code afterwards already.
Unlike the last PR this also handles other types with destructors properly, in the event that we can have open drops on them in the future (by partial initialization or DerefMove or something).
Finally, I also added tests for the interaction with async drop here but I discovered rust-lang/rust#143658, so one of the tests has a `knownbug` annotation. Not sure if it should be in this PR at all though.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#131082
r? wesleywiser - prev. reviewer
uniquify root goals during HIR typeck
We need to rely on region identity to deal with hangs such as https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/210 and to keep the current behavior of `fn try_merge_responses`.
This is a problem as borrowck starts by replacing each *occurrence* of a region with a unique inference variable. This frequently splits a single region during HIR typeck into multiple distinct regions. As we assume goals to always succeed during borrowck, relying on two occurances of a region being identical during HIR typeck causes ICE. See the now fixed examples in https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/27 and rust-lang/rust#139409.
We've previously tried to avoid this issue by always *uniquifying* regions when canonicalizing goals. This prevents caching subtrees during canonicalization which resulted in hangs for very large types. People rely on such types in practice, which caused us to revert our attempt to reinstate `#[type_length_limit]` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127670. The complete list of changes here:
- rust-lang/rust#107981
- rust-lang/rust#110180
- rust-lang/rust#114117
- rust-lang/rust#130821
After more consideration, all occurrences of such large types need to happen outside of typeck/borrowck. We know this as we already walk over all types in the MIR body when replacing their regions with nll vars.
This PR therefore enables us to rely on region identity inside of the trait solver by exclusively **uniquifying root goals during HIR typeck**. These are the only goals we assume to hold during borrowck. This is insufficient as type inference variables may "hide" regions we later uniquify. Because of this, we now stash proven goals which depend on inference variables in HIR typeck and reprove them after writeback. This closes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/127.
This was originally part of rust-lang/rust#144258 but I've moved it into a separate PR. While I believe we need to rely on region identity to fix the performance issues in some way, I don't know whether rust-lang/rust#144258 is the best approach to actually do so. Regardless of how we deal with the hangs however, this change is necessary and desirable regardless.
r? `@compiler-errors` or `@BoxyUwU`
Make sure to account for the right item universal regions in borrowck
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144608.
The ICE comes from a mismatch between the liberated late bound regions (i.e. "`ReLateParam`"s) that come from promoting closure outlives, and the regions we have in our region vid mapping from `UniversalRegions`.
When building `UniversalRegions`, we end up using the liberated regions from the binder of the closure's signature:
c8bb4e8a12/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/universal_regions.rs (L521)
Notably, this signature may be anonymized if the closure signature being deduced comes from an external constraints:
c8bb4e8a12/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/closure.rs (L759-L762)
This is true in the test file I committed, where the signature is influenced by the `impl FnMut(&mut ())` RPIT.
However, when promoting a type outlives constraint we end up creating a late bound lifetime mapping that disagrees with those liberated late bound regions we constructed in `UniversalRegions`:
c8bb4e8a12/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/universal_regions.rs (L299)
Specifically, in `for_each_late_bound_region_in_item` (which is called by `for_each_late_bound_region_in_recursive_scope`), we were using `tcx.late_bound_vars` which uses the late bound regions *from the HIR*. This query both undercounts the late bound regions (e.g. those that end up being deduced from bounds), and also doesn't account for the fact that we anonymize them in the signature as mentioned above.
c8bb4e8a12/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/universal_regions.rs (L977)
This PR fixes that function to use the *correct signature*, which properly considers the bound vars that come from deducing the signature of the closure, and which comes from the closure's args from the `type_of` query.
Remove `hello_world` directory
Move `tests/ui/hello_world/main.rs` and retire the single-file `tests/ui/hello_world/` directory.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133895.
r? `@jieyouxu`
Verify llvm-needs-components are not empty and match the --target value
I recently discovered a test with an empty `llvm-needs-components` entry (fixed in rust-lang/rust#143979) which meant that it didn't work correctly when building Rust with a limited set of LLVM targets.
This change makes a pair of improvements to prevent this issue from creeping in again:
* When parsing directives with values, `compiletest` will now raise an error if there is an empty value.
* Improved the `target_specific_tests` tidy checker to map targets to LLVM components, to verify that any existing `llvm-needs-components` contains the target being used.
I also fixed all the issues flagged by the improved tidy checker.
expand: Micro-optimize prelude injection
Use `splice` to avoid shifting the other items twice.
Put `extern crate std;` first so it's already resolved when we resolve `::std::prelude::rust_20XX`.
Add a test case for the issue #129882
It ensures that using the `generic_const_exprs` feature in a library crate without enabling it in a dependent crate does not lead to an ICE.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129882.
feat: Right align line numbers
As part of my work on getting `annotate-snipptes` to be used as `rustc`'s renderer, I realized that `rustc` left-aligned line numbers, while `annotate-snippets` right-aligned them. This PR switches `rustc` to right-align the line numbers, matching `annotate-snippets`. In practice, this change isn't very noticeable in day-to-day output, as it only shows up when a diagnostic span contains line numbers with different lengths (9->10, 99->100, 999->1000, etc.).
`rustc`
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `F` in this scope
--> $DIR/ui-testing-optout.rs:92:10
|
4 | type A = B;
| ----------- similarly named type alias `A` defined here
...
92 | type E = F;
| ^ help: a type alias with a similar name exists: `A`
```
`annotate-snippets`
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `F` in this scope
--> $DIR/ui-testing-optout.rs:92:10
|
4 | type A = B;
| ----------- similarly named type alias `A` defined here
...
92 | type E = F;
| ^ help: a type alias with a similar name exists: `A`
```
r? ``@compiler-errors``
thread name in stack overflow message
Fixesrust-lang/rust#144481, which is caused by the thread name not being initialised yet when setting up the stack overflow information. Unfortunately, the stack overflow UI test did not test for the correct thread name being present, and testing this separately didn't occur to me when writing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140628.
This PR contains the smallest possible fix I could think of: passing the thread name explicitly to the platform thread creation function. In the future I'd very much like to explore some possibilities around merging the thread packet and thread handle into one structure and using that in the platform code instead – but that's best left for another PR.
This PR also amends the stack overflow test to check for thread names, so we don't run into this again.
``@rustbot`` label +beta-nominated
