We need to be able to get the receiver even if there is no field name yet, and currently "a." wouldn't get parsed as a field name at all. This seems to help. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| err | ||
| fuzz-failures | ||
| inline | ||
| ok | ||
We need to be able to get the receiver even if there is no field name yet, and currently "a." wouldn't get parsed as a field name at all. This seems to help. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| err | ||
| fuzz-failures | ||
| inline | ||
| ok | ||