3cb1a4676a
More robust debug assertions for `Instance::resolve` on built-in traits with non-standard trait items In #111264, a user added a new item to the `Future` trait, but the code in [`resolve_associated_item`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_ty_utils/instance/fn.resolve_associated_item.html) implicitly assumes that the `Future` trait is defined with only one method (`Future::poll`) and treats the generator body as the implementation of that method. This PR adds some debug assertions to make sure that that new methods defined on `Future`/`Generator`/etc. don't accidentally resolve to the wrong item when they are added, and adds a helpful comment guiding a compiler dev (or curious `#![no_core]` user) to what must be done to support adding new associated items to these built-in implementations. I am open to discuss whether a test should be added, but I chose against it because I opted to make these `bug!()`s instead of, e.g., diagnostics or fatal errors. Arguably it doesn't need a test because it's not a bug that can be triggered by an end user, and internal-facing misuses of core kind of touch on rust-lang/compiler-team#620 -- however, I think the assertions I added in this PR are still a very useful way to make sure this bug doesn't waste debugging resources down the line. Fixes #111264 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| abi.rs | ||
| assoc.rs | ||
| common_traits.rs | ||
| consts.rs | ||
| errors.rs | ||
| implied_bounds.rs | ||
| instance.rs | ||
| layout.rs | ||
| layout_sanity_check.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| needs_drop.rs | ||
| representability.rs | ||
| structural_match.rs | ||
| ty.rs | ||