bors ef0ec303fa Auto merge of #85596 - scottmcm:more-on-unimplemented, r=estebank ... Extend `rustc_on_implemented` to improve more `?` error messages `_Self` could match the generic definition; this adds that functionality for matching the generic definition of type parameters too. Your advice welcome on the wording of all these messages, and which things belong in the message/label/note. r? `@estebank`		2021-05-24 15:24:38 +00:00
..
arith.rs	Document panicking cases for integer remainder	2021-03-01 17:13:50 -05:00
bit.rs	documentation examples fixes in rustfmt convention	2020-11-01 18:53:22 +05:30
control_flow.rs	#[cfg(bootstrap)] out the v1 try_trait stuff	2021-05-19 13:32:15 -07:00
deref.rs	Bump cfgs	2021-04-04 14:57:05 -04:00
drop.rs	Fix small typo in Drop documentation	2021-04-14 16:05:56 -04:00
function.rs	Convert primitives to use intra-doc links	2021-02-25 20:31:53 -05:00
generator.rs	mv std libs to library/	2020-07-27 19:51:13 -05:00
index.rs	Say that it "may panic"	2021-04-18 18:16:10 +02:00
mod.rs	#[cfg(bootstrap)] out the v1 try_trait stuff	2021-05-19 13:32:15 -07:00
range.rs	Rename Range::ensure_subset_of to slice::range	2021-02-12 22:01:04 -05:00
try.rs	Perf Experiment: Wait, what if I just skip the trait alias	2021-05-06 11:37:46 -07:00
try_trait.rs	Extend rustc_on_implemented to improve a ?-on-ControlFlow error message	2021-05-23 07:18:02 -07:00
unsize.rs	Use intra-doc-links in core::ops::*	2020-08-21 23:19:10 +02:00