The reasons for doing this are: * The model on which linked failure is based is inherently complex * The implementation is also very complex, and there are few remaining who fully understand the implementation * There are existing race conditions in the core context switching function of the scheduler, and possibly others. * It's unclear whether this model of linked failure maps well to a 1:1 threading model Linked failure is often a desired aspect of tasks, but we would like to take a much more conservative approach in re-implementing linked failure if at all. Closes #8674 Closes #8318 Closes #8863 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auxiliary | ||
| bench | ||
| codegen | ||
| compile-fail | ||
| debug-info | ||
| pretty | ||
| run-fail | ||
| run-pass | ||
| run-pass-fulldeps | ||