Mark some edition tests as check-pass ## Overview This helps with #62277. In short, there are some tests that were marked as `build-pass` when it was unclear whether `check-pass` might be more appropriate. This PR marks some of those tests as `compile-pass`, in addition to making some incidental formatting improvements. ## A brief explanation of why this is correct These tests fall into a few buckets. `src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-edition-keyword-ident-lint.rs` `src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-idents-in-decl-macros-unlinted.rs` `src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-idents-in-macros-unlinted.rs` `src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-no-warnings-without-lints.rs` `src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/issue-56327-dyn-trait-in-macro-is-okay.rs` These test a lint for a keyword added in a new edition and the corresponding changes in keyword rules. `src/test/ui/editions/edition-feature-ok.rs` This checks that a feature related to an edition transition is valid. `src/test/ui/editions/edition-imports-virtual-2015-ambiguity.rs` This checks that imports between editions work correctly. `src/test/ui/editions/edition-keywords-2015-2015-expansion.rs` `src/test/ui/editions/edition-keywords-2018-2015-expansion.rs` This checks the interaction between a change in keyword status over editions and macros. All of the things being tested come before linking and codegen, so it is safe to use `check-pass` for them. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| bootstrap | ||
| build_helper | ||
| ci | ||
| doc | ||
| etc | ||
| librustdoc | ||
| llvm-project@39c5555872 | ||
| rustdoc-json-types | ||
| test | ||
| tools | ||
| README.md | ||
| stage0.txt | ||
| version | ||
This directory contains the source code of the rust project, including:
- The test suite
- The bootstrapping build system
- Various submodules for tools, like rustdoc, rls, etc.
For more information on how various parts of the compiler work, see the rustc dev guide.