rust/compiler/rustc_span/src
Ralf Jung a0215d8e46 Re-do recursive const stability checks
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features

This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.

Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.

The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.

Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00
..
analyze_source_file Be more accurate about calculating display_col from a BytePos 2024-07-18 20:08:38 +00:00
edit_distance Add test for precise algorithm used 2023-02-19 22:59:22 +00:00
source_map Avoid another &Lrc<..> in a return value. 2024-10-07 13:59:50 +11:00
symbol Reformat use declarations. 2024-07-29 08:26:52 +10:00
analyze_source_file.rs Add warn(unreachable_pub) to rustc_span. 2024-09-03 08:49:54 +10:00
caching_source_map_view.rs Reformat use declarations. 2024-07-29 08:26:52 +10:00
def_id.rs Reformat using the new identifier sorting from rustfmt 2024-09-22 19:11:29 -04:00
edit_distance.rs Reformat use declarations. 2024-07-29 08:26:52 +10:00
edition.rs Remove extern crate rustc_macros from numerous crates. 2024-04-29 10:21:54 +10:00
fatal_error.rs Auto merge of #117557 - Zoxc:panic-prio, r=petrochenkov 2023-11-09 00:39:02 +00:00
hygiene.rs Reformat using the new identifier sorting from rustfmt 2024-09-22 19:11:29 -04:00
lib.rs Avoid another &Lrc<..> in a return value. 2024-10-07 13:59:50 +11:00
profiling.rs Reformat use declarations. 2024-07-29 08:26:52 +10:00
source_map.rs add unstable support for outputting file checksums for use in cargo 2024-10-01 21:23:20 -06:00
span_encoding.rs Reformat using the new identifier sorting from rustfmt 2024-09-22 19:11:29 -04:00
symbol.rs Re-do recursive const stability checks 2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00
tests.rs add unstable support for outputting file checksums for use in cargo 2024-10-01 21:23:20 -06:00