Improve clarity of `core::sync::atomic` docs about "Considerations" in regards to CAS operations
## Motivation
The existing documentation for atomic `fetch_update` (and other similar methods) has a section that reads like so:
> ### Considerations
> This method is not magic; it is not provided by the hardware. It is implemented in
> terms of `AtomicBlah::compare_exchange_weak`, and suffers from the same drawbacks.
> In particular, this method will not circumvent the [ABA Problem].
>
> [ABA Problem]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABA_problem
The wording here seems to imply that the drawbacks being discusses are caused by the *`weak` version* of `compare_exchange`, and that one may avoid those drawbacks by using `compare_exchange` instead. Indeed, a conversation in the `#dark-arts` channel on the Rust community discord based on this interpretation led to this PR.
In reality, the drawbacks are inherent to implementing such an operation based on *any* compare-and-swap style operation, as opposed to an [LL,SC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load-link/store-conditional) operation, and they apply equally to `compare_exchange` and `compare_exchange_weak` as well.
## Changes
- Rewords existing Considerations section on `fetch_update` and friends to make clear that the limitations are inherent to an implementation based on any CAS operation, rather than the weak version of `compare_exchange` in particular. New version:
> ### Considerations
>
> This method is not magic; it is not provided by the hardware, and does not act like a
> critical section or mutex.
>
> It is implemented on top of an atomic [compare-and-swap operation], and thus is subject to
> the usual drawbacks of CAS operations. In particular, be careful of the [ABA problem]
> if this atomic integer is an index or more generally if knowledge of only the *bitwise value*
> of the atomic is not in and of itself sufficient to ensure any required preconditions.
>
> [ABA Problem]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABA_problem
> [compare-and-swap operation]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compare-and-swap
- Add Considerations to `compare_exchange` and `compare_exchange_weak` which details similar considerations and when they may be relevant. New version:
> ### Considerations
>
> `compare_exchange` is a [compare-and-swap operation] and thus exhibits the usual downsides
> of CAS operations. In particular, a load of the value followed by a successful
> `compare_exchange` with the previous load *does not ensure* that other threads have not
> changed the value in the interim. This is usually important when the *equality* check in
> the `compare_exchange` is being used to check the *identity* of a value, but equality
> does not necessarily imply identity. In this case, `compare_exchange` can lead to the
> [ABA problem].
>
> [ABA Problem]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABA_problem
> [compare-and-swap operation]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compare-and-swap
764be85223