bdbe392a13
Rename `assert_uninit_valid` intrinsic It's not about "uninit" anymore but about "filling with 0x01 bytes" so the name should at least try to reflect that. This is actually not fully correct though, as it does still panic for all uninit with `-Zstrict-init-checks`. I'm not sure what the best way is to deal with that not causing confusion. I guess we could just remove the flag? I don't think having it makes a lot of sense anymore with the direction that we have chose to go. It could be relevant again if #100423 lands so removing it may be a bit over eager. r? `@RalfJung` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| back | ||
| coverageinfo | ||
| debuginfo | ||
| mir | ||
| traits | ||
| base.rs | ||
| codegen_attrs.rs | ||
| common.rs | ||
| errors.rs | ||
| glue.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| meth.rs | ||
| mono_item.rs | ||
| target_features.rs | ||