name resolution for guard patterns This PR provides an initial implementation of name resolution for guard patterns [(RFC 3637)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3637-guard-patterns.md). This does not change the requirement that the bindings on either side of an or-pattern must be the same [(proposal here)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3637-guard-patterns.md#allowing-mismatching-bindings-when-possible); the code that handles that is separate from what this PR touches, so I'm saving it for a follow-up. On a technical level, this separates "collecting the bindings in a pattern" (which was already done for or-patterns) from "introducing those bindings into scope". I believe the approach used here can be extended straightforwardly in the future to work with `if let` guard patterns, but I haven't tried it myself since we don't allow those yet. Tracking issue for guard patterns: #129967 cc ``@Nadrieril`` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| late | ||
| build_reduced_graph.rs | ||
| check_unused.rs | ||
| def_collector.rs | ||
| diagnostics.rs | ||
| effective_visibilities.rs | ||
| errors.rs | ||
| ident.rs | ||
| imports.rs | ||
| late.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| macros.rs | ||
| rustdoc.rs | ||