The `BodyLifetimeChecker` which checks for the use of any non-anonymous non-static lifetime did not recurse into closures, missing lifetime uses. This would lead to a bogus elision suggestion. The `BodyLifetimeChecker` is not refined enough to avoid false positives, as any conforming lifetime, including one coming from the outer context, would be considered a hit. The number of false positives might increase now that we check closures as well, in case those closures define and use lifetimes themselves. changelog: [`needless_lifetimes`]: do not suggest removing a lifetime which is later used in a closure Fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#14607 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| README.md | ||