rust/src/test/compile-fail/issue-17959.rs
Felix S. Klock II aa030dd3de Followup for #46112.
Sorting by crate-num should ensure that we favor `std::foo::bar` over
`any_other_crate::foo::bar`.

Interestingly, *this* change had a much larger impact on our internal
test suite than PR #46708 (which was my original fix to #46112).
2017-12-19 15:04:02 +01:00

31 lines
793 B
Rust

// Copyright 2015 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
extern crate core;
use core::ops::Drop;
trait Bar {}
struct G<T: ?Sized> {
_ptr: *const T
}
impl<T> Drop for G<T> {
//~^ ERROR: The requirement `T: std::marker::Sized` is added only by the Drop impl. [E0367]
fn drop(&mut self) {
if !self._ptr.is_null() {
}
}
}
fn main() {
let x:G<Bar>;
}