addb4da686
Fix spacing of links in inline code. Similar to #80733, but the focus is different. This PR eliminates all occurrences of pieced-together inline code blocks like [`Box`]`<`[`Option`]`<T>>` and replaces them with good-looking ones (using HTML-syntax), like <code>[Box]<[Option]\<T>></code>. As far as I can tell, I should’ve found all of these in the standard library (regex search with `` r"`\]`|`\[`" ``) \[except for in `core::convert` where I’ve noticed other things in the docs that I want to fix in a separate PR]. In particular, unlike #80733, I’ve added almost no new instance of inline code that’s broken up into multiple links (or some link and some link-free part). I also added tooltips (the stuff in quotes for the markdown link listings) in places that caught my eye, but that’s by no means systematic, just opportunistic. [Box]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/boxed/struct.Box.html "Box" [`Box`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/boxed/struct.Box.html "Box" [Option]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/option/enum.Option.html "Option" [`Option`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/option/enum.Option.html "Option" Context: I got annoyed by repeatedly running into new misformatted inline code while reading the standard library docs. I know that once issue #83997 (and/or related ones) are resolved, these changes become somewhat obsolete, but I fail to notice much progress on that end right now. r? `@jyn514` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| cow.rs | ||
| drain.rs | ||
| drain_filter.rs | ||
| in_place_drop.rs | ||
| into_iter.rs | ||
| is_zero.rs | ||
| mod.rs | ||
| partial_eq.rs | ||
| set_len_on_drop.rs | ||
| source_iter_marker.rs | ||
| spec_extend.rs | ||
| spec_from_elem.rs | ||
| spec_from_iter.rs | ||
| spec_from_iter_nested.rs | ||
| splice.rs | ||