9ec5960e3d
Make it so that async-fn-in-trait is compatible with a concrete future in implementation There's no technical reason why an AFIT like `async fn foo()` cannot be satisfied with an implementation signature like `fn foo() -> Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = ()> + 'static>>`. We rejected this previously because we were uncertain about how AFITs worked with refinement, but I don't believe this needs to be a restriction any longer. r? oli-obk |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| assembly | ||
| auxiliary | ||
| codegen | ||
| codegen-units | ||
| coverage | ||
| coverage-run-rustdoc | ||
| debuginfo | ||
| incremental | ||
| mir-opt | ||
| pretty | ||
| run-make | ||
| run-make-fulldeps | ||
| run-pass-valgrind | ||
| rustdoc | ||
| rustdoc-gui | ||
| rustdoc-js | ||
| rustdoc-js-std | ||
| rustdoc-json | ||
| rustdoc-ui | ||
| ui | ||
| ui-fulldeps | ||
| COMPILER_TESTS.md | ||