1661f77e7b
Always use the Rust version in package names
The format of the tarballs produced by CI is roughly the following:
{component}-{release}-{target}.{ext}
While on the beta and nightly channels `{release}` is just the channel name, on the stable channel is either the Rust version or the version of the component we're shipping:
cargo-0.47.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
clippy-0.0.212-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
llvm-tools-1.46.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
miri-0.1.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
rls-1.41.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
rust-1.46.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz
...
This makes it really hard to get the package URL without having access to the manifest (and there is no manifest on ci-artifacts.rlo), as there is no consistent version number to use.
This PR addresses the problem by always using the Rust version number as `{release}` for the stable channel, regardless of the version number of the component we're shipping. I chose that instead of "stable" to avoid breaking the URL scheme *that* much.
Rustup should not be affected by this change, as it fetches the URLs from the manifest. Unfortunately we don't have a way to test other clients before making a stable release, as this change only affects the stable channel.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| bootstrap | ||
| build_helper | ||
| ci | ||
| doc | ||
| etc | ||
| librustdoc | ||
| llvm-project@3adf16e0cb | ||
| test | ||
| tools | ||
| README.md | ||
| stage0.txt | ||
| version | ||
This directory contains the source code of the rust project, including:
- The test suite
- The bootstrapping build system
- Various submodules for tools, like rustdoc, rls, etc.
For more information on how various parts of the compiler work, see the rustc dev guide.