Don't show `unresolved-field` diagnostic for missing names I don't think reporting ``"no field `[missing name]` on type `SomeType`"`` makes much sense because it's a syntax error rather than a semantic error. We already report a syntax error for it and I find it sufficient. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| handlers | ||
| tests | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| tests.rs | ||