eb36bc666a
Improve diagnostics for functions in `struct` definitions Tries to implement #76421. This is probably going to need unit tests, but I wanted to hear from review all the cases tests should cover. I'd like to follow up with the "mechanically applicable suggestion here that adds an impl block" step, but I'd need guidance. My idea for now would be to try to parse a function, and if that succeeds, create a dummy `ast::Item` impl block to then format it using `pprust`. Would that be a viable approach? Is there a better alternative? r? `@matklad` cc `@estebank` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| bootstrap | ||
| build_helper | ||
| ci | ||
| doc | ||
| etc | ||
| librustdoc | ||
| llvm-project@b61c24f352 | ||
| rustdoc-json-types | ||
| test | ||
| tools | ||
| README.md | ||
| stage0.txt | ||
| version | ||
This directory contains the source code of the rust project, including:
- The test suite
- The bootstrapping build system
- Various submodules for tools, like rustdoc, rls, etc.
For more information on how various parts of the compiler work, see the rustc dev guide.