ed61c139c2
feed resolver_for_lowering instead of storing it in a field r? `@cjgillot` opening this as * a discussion for `no_hash` + `feedable` queries. I think we'll want those, but I don't quite understand why they are rejected beyond a double check of the stable hashes for situations where the query is fed but also read from incremental caches. * and a discussion on removing all untracked fields from TyCtxt and setting it up so that they are fed queries instead |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| callbacks.rs | ||
| errors.rs | ||
| interface.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| passes.rs | ||
| proc_macro_decls.rs | ||
| queries.rs | ||
| tests.rs | ||
| util.rs | ||